What?, something like this;

or this;

From what I have seen dispalayed as of late, 2020 is not in the cards for the leftists.

 

I love when I get lumped in with leftists.

Being a non partisan observer from afar , with no axe to grind either way ,
I'm more sad about the situation , than anything else.

When I see more and more of the world openly laughing at the supposed leader of the free world ,
and even more trying to be PC , and not laugh openly ,
something is terribly wrong.

(and the only ones not laughing are the ones desperately worried about the disastrous results that may transpire)

Sadly , so far , he's in danger of making America more and more irrelevant , instead of great ,
if he dosent wise up pretty quickly.

So far , all he's really doing , is playing into Russia's and China's hands.
They must be secretly and independently rubbing their hands together.
What could be better for them , than a chaotic and ineffective America ?

 

You are not non-partisan as you claim, if you were, you would see though the mirage the leftist of the world have attempted to illustrate.

That's not what you are doing, if anyone has fallen into the hands of anyone, it is you, that have fallen into the hands of the leftists.

It doesn't really matter though.

Trump was elected to disavow the status quo, and as it stands, he's doing a fine job...better than I had expected.

 

Well everyone is welcome to their opinion.
I happen to disagree with yours ,
and am not in the least bothered where you chose to pigeonhole me , right or wrong.

I don't care who's at the helm , but I would like to see a successful and prosperous America , contributing to a balanced world situation.
It's not looking likely any time soon at the moment, from where I'm standing.

 

I agree.

That's exactly what Trump want's for this country too, the question remains;

1) Is it Trump that is failing?

or,

2) Is it the leftists in or out of political position/office that is sabotaging the current administration.?
a) with hold ups in the Senate to confirm cabinet appointees?
b) an activist judicial system blocking well deemed EO's?
c) a media that is partisan politically?
d) paid protestors attempting to hold on to the status quo?

All in the collaborated attempt to de-legitimize the presidency of Trump.

 

I admit freely and willingly that I know nothing about politics and talk bullshit. And even my papi said that I myself am guilty of talking bullshit about bullshit and more bullshit until I have a great big pile of bullshit about the bullshit I've talked about and it hurt my feelings until he pulled me to him to kiss me and said, '' honey I love you and no matter how much bullshit you talk, you look gorgeous when you doing it'' then he gave me the kiss and said quit talking bullshit and come to bed now.

 

It is hilarious to me to watch even Fox News throw Trump and his wiretapping lie under the bus while Trump just keeps digging himself in deeper and deeper every day trying to lie his way out of his lie while more and more Republicans run away from Trump.

 

He could have lied and lied and dug his way to China but at the end of the day he is still President and worth about 3.4 billion dollars, wait did I say 3.4 million ? Nope I didn't it's 3.4 billion. And though money is not the most important thing in life , 3.4 billion is a nice place to be at the end of any day.
I think.

 

GOP rep: Trump owes Obama apology for 'reckless' wiretap

 

I apologize stumbler for ranting on you and by taking the things you said about me personally. I should have not interjected into this discussion at all because I am certainly out of my element with anything politically and the workings of politics. So again I'm sorry and I will not intervene anymore and I feel really stupid.

 

The Republican Party used to be a party of responsible conservatives. Conservatives, by definition, defend the status quo. Since Ronald Reagan the Republican Party has become an unruly mob of reactionaries who want to repeal the reforms of the New Deal, and right wing radicals who believe in delusions like supply side economics.

 

You look really beautiful.

Please interject in my discussions any time you want to.

 

2018!

 

You're a flippin fool.

Conservatives are not defending the status quo...

They're defending the U.S.C. as written and intended to be....fool.

Those ''conservatives'' that you speak of belong to the ''freedom caucus'', with less than 30 true conservatives, they are hardly a majority voice in the House.

 

UhOh..one less shiny bauble for the leftists to cling one in the future....dammit.

Eric Trump: Trump Organization No Longer Expanding Internationally

 

Breaking news:

 

Yeah, the establishment, the leftists, the media...still fighting with Trump....what a shocker.

 

White House eyeing executive order targeting 'conflict minerals' rule: sources
President Donald Trump is planning to issue an executive order targeting a controversial Dodd-Frank rule that requires companies to disclose whether their products contain "conflict minerals" from a war-torn part of Africa, according to sources familiar with the administration's thinking.

Reuters could not learn the precise timing of when the order will be issued, or exactly what it will say.

However, the 2010 Dodd-Frank law explicitly gives the president authority to order the Securities and Exchange Commission to temporarily suspend or revise the rule for two years if it is in the national security interest of the United States.

The sources spoke anonymously because it is not public and they were not authorized to speak on the record.

The plan for the executive order comes on the heels of another order issued by the White House last week that takes aim more broadly at the Dodd-Frank rules put into place after the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

That order did not single out any one particular rule, but it called on the Treasury Secretary to consult with other regulators, including the SEC, and to come back with a report outlining possible regulatory changes and legislation.

The conflict minerals rule is one of several disclosure regulations that was tucked into Dodd-Frank that are unrelated to the financial crisis itself.

A second Dodd-Frank SEC disclosure rule that required oil, gas and mining companies to disclose payments to foreign governments, meanwhile, was repealed by the Republican-controlled Congress last week.

The conflict minerals rule was pushed by human rights groups who want companies to tell investors if their products contain tantalum, tin, gold or tungsten mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo, in the hopes it will help curb the funding of armed groups.

But business groups have staunchly opposed the measure, saying it forces companies to furnish politically-charged information that is irrelevant to making investment decisions.

They have also complained it costs too much money for companies to trace the source of the minerals through the supply chain.

In 2014, a U.S. appeals court struck down a part of the conflict minerals law after the Business Roundtable, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers sued the SEC over the rule.

The court found part of it violated the free speech rights of companies by forcing them to publicly state that their products are not conflict free.

The rest of the rule, however, remained intact and companies are still required to carry out due diligence and report the details of those inquiries in public reports filed with the SEC.

SEC can scale back rule
The SEC cannot permanently repeal the rule without a law passed by Congress. However, it can use its broad exemptive powers to scale back some of the requirements or stop enforcing the rule entirely.

Last week, Acting SEC Chair Michael Piwowar took steps toward doing just that, by announcing he has asked SEC staff to reconsider how companies should comply with it and whether "additional relief" is warranted.

Piwowar did not explicitly ask Trump to utilize his powers under Dodd-Frank to temporality suspend the rule; however, in his statement, he spoke about how he had traveled to Africa to study the rule's impact and raised concerns about its effect on national security.

 

More deregulating.

Keeping more of the campaign promises.

Yes, refreshing as it is...keeping campaign promises.

 

Everything Trump touches is shady and this is his building and he is partly responsible for these shady fuckers ...