Read this today, and I agree 100%

25 Things I Trust More than Hillary Clinton and her minions:

• Mexican tap water
• A wolverine with a 'pet me' sign
• A mixed drink made by Bill Cosby
• A straight edge shave from Jodi Arias
• An elevator ride with Ray Rice
• A night out with Aaron Hernandez
• Brian Williams memory
• Pete Carroll coaching decisions
• Loch Ness monster sightings
• Pinocchio
• The Boy that cried Wolf
• Browns going to the Super Bowl
• A Nigerian inheritance email
• A pilot alone in the cockpit
• Harry Reid's exercise equipment
• Tying Anthony Weiner's shoes
• A fart in an automatic car wash
• A factory packed parachute
• A kiss from Judas
• An Afghan wearing a backpack
• A Supreme Court decision
• Keeping my healthcare plan
• A North Korean trial
• A BIC pen that doesn't leak
• A week old tuna fish sandwich found on a city bus

 

26. Bill

 

27. Monsanto

 

28. Lorena Bobbitt

 

I trust that bitch zero, she would be dead last out of the hundreds of billions of people on earth

 

Donald.

 

someone saying , "tie me kan ga roo down sport"

WrolfWrolf

 

I trust her more than I trust the GOP

 

I trust her . . . . I trust her to lie about something . . . . sooner than later.

 

ADDING;

They are a questionable bunch lately.

 

A loaded gun in my home...a loaded gun in all homes.

 

Lately? All politicians are questionable all the time...just those damn Dems have never an acceptable answer to the question. And the GOP won't step up and ask the tough questions...not that they have any answers either. This is why I say Trump. He is not of party, and he already has bank, no need in post-presidency speaking tour or a fucking library. Can't be bought and I don't believe the man fears making tough decisions...and plenty of them. Will he be wrong, yes, probably quite a bit in his first term learning curve. By term two he will have the circus performing his acts. Or I'm just full of shit and Hillary will be our saving grace...not.

 

I trust the republicans to mount politically motivated attacks using tax payer money. Wonder why none of the right wing whiners are whelping about that waste of tax money?

 

You don't seem to ever look at the entire picture, you seem to focus only on the right. You might want to visit an ophthalmologist.

 

Wow, that fully addressed what I said... Doesn't surprise me that you constantly stoop to ad hominem attacks, because it's all you've got...

 

Not at all, I've got plenty of other good stuff, but when I post it, you ignore it and continue with your tunnel vision remarks.

At least when I do post these short, but accurate barbs, you seem to pay attention.

 

As soon as you say something interesting, I'll let you know, old man. The only thing accurate in your life is the consistency with which you piss on the toilet seat.

 

I only piss on the toilet seat when people like you ask me to. You seem to love licking it up.

 

Oh! Zing!

 

Weekly Update: Clinton Cash Scandal News‏

This week, we released 789 pages of State Department "ethics" review documents concerning former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, revealing that at least one speech by Bill Clinton appeared to take place without the required State Department ethics approval. The documents also include a copy of Bill Clinton's draft consultant agreement with Laureate Education, Inc., which was submitted for ethics review by the State Department. But the State Department redacted the information regarding compensation and the specific services Bill Clinton was hired to provide to the controversial "for profit" education company. The documents were released as a result of a federal court order in our history-making Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department on May 28, 2013, (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-00772)).

The documents include heavily redacted emails from 2009 about the review of a speech Bill Clinton was set to give to the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries (ISRI). An April 1, 2009, email from then-State Department Senior Ethics Counsel Waldo W. "Chip" Brooks notes that the ethics review approval of the speech "was in the hands of Jim [Thessin] and Cheryl Mills. They were to discuss with Counsel to the former President. I do not know if either ever did."


The documents show the State Department approved scores of requests by former President Bill Clinton to appear as the featured speaker at events sponsored by some of the world's leading international investment and banking firms, including J.P. Morgan, Barclays, Merrill Lynch, Sweden's ABG, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, Brazil's Banco Itau, Vista Equity Partners, Goldman Sachs, Vanguard Group (described as "one of the world's largest investment management companies"), Canada's Imperial Bank of Commerce, and Saudi Arabia's SAGIA conglomerate (which claims to be the "gateway to investments in Saudi Arabia").

While the majority of the documents do not contain the fees that Clinton charged for his speaking services, those that are disclosed reveal that the former president routinely received six-figure honorariums for his advice to the international investment counseling firms and banking institutions, including:• Barclays Capital Singapore - $325,000
• Needham Partners South Africa - $350,000
• Cumbre de Negocios (sponsored by Nacional Financiera and El Banco Fuerte de Mexico) - $275,000 and $125,000)
• NTRPLC (which describes itself as "developing a new investment portfolio of wind projects in Ireland and the UK") - $125,000The documents reveal that between 2009 and 2011, former President Clinton spoke to more than two dozen leading international investment firms and banking institutions, many of them on more than one occasion. At least one of the documents shows that Hillary Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills used a non-governmental email account for the Clinton ethics reviews. Mills reportedly negotiated the "ethics agreement" on behalf of the Clintons and the Foundation that required the Clintons to submit to rigorous conflict-of-interest checks. Despite this, and in apparent violation of Obama administration ethics rules, the documents reveal that Bill Clinton's requests for speaking engagement approval were invariably copied to Mills, who was involved in ethics reviews as chief of staff for Mrs. Clinton at the State Department.