high school girls

[pvtdox]

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

[ReadThisShit!]

Im just out of highschool,i never got to fuck one

[Kenster]

when there are determines its put out for them that all i can say

[Ovid58]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

Why jail bait?!?
I did have lots of girls when I was in HS!

Stick to your age range and... you'll never be in trouble!

[incurablyinsane]

Originally Posted by Ovid58

Why jail bait?!?
I did have lots of girls when I was in HS!

Stick to your age range and... you'll never be in trouble!

true that.....if you are like above 25 and dont know to handle things right..then they are jail bait

[Young Mormon girl]

Doing younger girls is fun and mainly illegal due to jealousy issues... No legislator who could get a 15 year old would make it illegal only ones who can't lol

[mattg12]

A lot of seniors are 18. 18 year old pUSsy changed my life

[Goud21]

[bigtrav20]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

There is so much porn of jail bait because its what people want every man has a dream of a nice younge girl. Over all its just for money and for people that just want to dream about what they cant have

[tupelohoney]

high school girls are so hot

[Milo Cronos]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

We can freely lust in theory "Wouldn't it be nice to.....?" anything and any one although I'd draw a line with of course anyone protected under statutory rape laws or molestation! But, this argument closed down Cherry Popper movies for implying young teens through ponytails and little pink dresses if you ask most guys in reality they knew the girls were 18! The danger is the guys who don't want to grasp it or better yet, psychologically can't?

[Ovid58]

Originally Posted by incurablyinsane

true that.....if you are like above 25 and dont know to handle things right..then they are jail bait

When I was over 25, honestly, a 16 yo girl was just (close to) nothing to me!...
Maybe I was lucky!
A 20 - 25 yo woman was MUCH more fun and entertainment!
Experience, "dick addiction", culture, maturity...

[CaCypher]

Yeah, I agree that although they are damn fine to ogle on occasion there is little actual attraction for me. I like to talk too, and there is NOTHING I have in common with anyone under 30 anymore!

[wishiwasg]

Originally Posted by Goud21

True but more fun if they r crazy a lil

[BiGuy20]

Well I had lots of fun with HS pussy while I was there, now I can't have it anymore. Sucks, but I do fuck 18 year old pussy now. I got laid at a beach party Saturday night with an 18 year old mixed girl. :P

[An Older Guy]

When I was 29,,, I was playing around with a 17 yr old,,, and she was my mother inlaws , husbands daughter !! What a body she had on her,, firm tits, nice ass,, and horny as hell !!

[Old Tool]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

Who says what we're not supposed to lust after? The church? Anything in between the ears is fair game, but acting on illegal fantasies has consequences, thus teen porn is a booming segment of the industry . . . you're not really confused about this are you?

[mattg12]

I like taking 18 year Olds up the aSS and I love making young PUSSY QUEEF

[pantyguy77]

It is normal to feel attracted to females of child bearing age, simple biology.

It is wrong to take advantage of a child, being biologically ready is far different than being psychologically ready.

[darkmobious]

Originally Posted by ReadThisShit!

Im just out of highschool,i never got to fuck one

same here man same here

[hugeballs]

The laws of society are far different from the laws of nature. My brain may see a high school girl and cause me to become very sexually aroused. This is because these girls, technically are of breeding age, and their bodies are sexually developed. However, the law states that a girl must be 18 and consent to sex. So its very important o ignore these cues and signals from the brain, unless you want to go to jail.
Having said that, theres no doubt that I have been aroused by high school girls. Especially nowadays, what with all the chemicals and preservatives in food, they are developing earlier then ever before. When I was in high school, I remember there only being a few girls with round asses and big tits. Now, it is far more common. All I can say is, high school guys are lucky these days!

[KatieColorado]

It's called ephebophilia and it's a well known and understood desire in human males. As some have said, it's an evolutionary impulse. Females tend to be more fertile at that age (16-21) and more than developed enough to withstand a pregnancy. Youth and beauty have always been desired by men even beyond a simple biological impulse. "Arm Candy" is a sign of power and virility as well. It's not that women beyond the traditional college age aren't great mates but the changes to our society compared to our ancestors makes them less desirable since many women are delaying pregnancy and even marriage. Men then go to the next logical step which are younger females who are likely more naive, manipulated and open to the desires of the men.

I don't say that last part negatively. It's a subconscious thing in a vast majority of the population. Those who are actually conscious of it and act on it are generally sociopaths. And I repeat the above as someone who is starting her graduate work in neurobiology and who herself was the younger female in a relationship with a much older man throughout high school.

It's not "sick" though. Even 100 years ago in most of rural America girls would be married between the ages of 14-16 and 200 years ago even urban centers saw this practice continue. It was the "puritan" and "revivalist" eras that essentially changed who society looked at things like age of consent and what constituted a minor from an adult. Ultimately 18 is just a number and some girls are mature psychologically and mentally at say 15 while others aren't ready until they are well into their 20s. But the law needed a number and since primary schooling ended around the age of 18, that became the target when talking about legislation.

[pvtdox]

Originally Posted by KatieColorado

It's called ephebophilia and it's a well known and understood desire in human males. As some have said, it's an evolutionary impulse. Females tend to be more fertile at that age (16-21) and more than developed enough to withstand a pregnancy. Youth and beauty have always been desired by men even beyond a simple biological impulse. "Arm Candy" is a sign of power and virility as well. It's not that women beyond the traditional college age aren't great mates but the changes to our society compared to our ancestors makes them less desirable since many women are delaying pregnancy and even marriage. Men then go to the next logical step which are younger females who are likely more naive, manipulated and open to the desires of the men.

I don't say that last part negatively. It's a subconscious thing in a vast majority of the population. Those who are actually conscious of it and act on it are generally sociopaths. And I repeat the above as someone who is starting her graduate work in neurobiology and who herself was the younger female in a relationship with a much older man throughout high school.

It's not "sick" though. Even 100 years ago in most of rural America girls would be married between the ages of 14-16 and 200 years ago even urban centers saw this practice continue. It was the "puritan" and "revivalist" eras that essentially changed who society looked at things like age of consent and what constituted a minor from an adult. Ultimately 18 is just a number and some girls are mature psychologically and mentally at say 15 while others aren't ready until they are well into their 20s. But the law needed a number and since primary schooling ended around the age of 18, that became the target when talking about legislation.

Last paragraph. It's the American way!

[umpire2]

Why all the controversy?

I can see the problem if someone is, say, over 35 and ONLY lusts after high school girls, but remember, about 80% of girls IN high school turn 18 between January and graduation time in June of their senior year (and some not-so-smart Sophomores and Juniors are 18 as well).

Not ALL high school girls are jailbait.

Perhaps THAT is the problem for some of you guys: You are ONLY attracted to high school girls BECAUSE they are jailbait----now THAT is sick.

[umpire2]

Originally Posted by KatieColorado

It's not "sick" though. Even 100 years ago in most of rural America girls would be married between the ages of 14-16 and 200 years ago even urban centers saw this practice continue. It was the "puritan" and "revivalist" eras that essentially changed who society looked at things like age of consent and what constituted a minor from an adult. Ultimately 18 is just a number and some girls are mature psychologically and mentally at say 15 while others aren't ready until they are well into their 20s. But the law needed a number and since primary schooling ended around the age of 18, that became the target when talking about legislation.

Where the heck did you dig up this nonsense?

100 years ago, the average age of women at first marriage was about 22, NOT 14 to 16; even in "rural areas" (and HALF of the U.S. was rural in 1910), where, while the average age at marriage was slightly younger than the national average, it was about 21.

According to you, marriage age for women changed from your (incorrect) average in the "puritan era" (which happened to be 220 to 280 years EARLIER (1630 to 1690, approximately---when the first marriage age was about 19 years for women----YOUNGER, not OLDER); and if you are referring to the "puritan age" of the 1950s, the marriage age THEN was the youngest in the "modern era" of the United States----approximately 20 years old for women.

So your stats are ass-backwards.

[KatieColorado]

Originally Posted by umpire2

Where the heck did you dig up this nonsense?

100 years ago, the average age of women at first marriage was about 22, NOT 14 to 16; even in "rural areas" (and HALF of the U.S. was rural in 1910), where, while the average age at marriage was slightly younger than the national average, it was about 21.

According to you, marriage age for women changed from your (incorrect) average in the "puritan era" (which happened to be 220 to 280 years EARLIER (1630 to 1690, approximately---when the first marriage age was about 19 years for women----YOUNGER, not OLDER); and if you are referring to the "puritan age" of the 1950s, the marriage age THEN was the youngest in the "modern era" of the United States----approximately 20 years old for women.

So your stats are ass-backwards.

while yes, the Puritans were a social structure of the mid 1600s, the influence of Congregationalists were extended well into the mid 1800s, especially in New England. The First and Second Revivals only reinforced many of their beliefs that were shared with other Christian sects, especially by New Light faiths like the Baptists.

Second, the "median age" numbers you are referring to combines data from urban centers in the late 1800s and early 1900s which is long after primary and secondary school was a normal function for females to attend. The 18th century (1700s), however, still saw most of America continuing social customs from Europe especially in non-British enclaves such as the Dutch, German, French and Slavic quarters. When the ethnic Germans and Dutch pioneered the move out west, they maintained their customs up until the mid-to-late 1800s when Federal control was expanded throughout all states and territories. The further west and south you were, the more likely it was to have brides in the 14-18 year old range whereas women in New England and most of the eastern seaboard tended to marry much later.

You also have to look at the data sets. More rural (in the US) or "common" (in Europe) folks didn't maintain strict records. Marriages were most often a communal only thing as were birth/death. A single woman in a non-urban setting whom was single at age 20 was generally looked at with pity and/or derision, that something was wrong with her. The norms didn't start to change for good until 1882 with the passage of the Marriage Property Act. Prior to that, women were still essentially property and the age gap was on the magnitude of 15-20 years. If a man had good social standing and the means to provide, proposals were rarely rejected and teenage girls were married off. However using what census data we do have as well as church/county records that have survived, the marriage of females as young as 14 to men aged 30+ was very common.

Using Infoplease and Wikipedia for data sets don't paint the whole picture. And I obtained my information over the course of 9 months as part of a thesis I wrote on human sexuality for my admission into grad school. If my data and sources were so wrong, I doubt I would have passed the review.

[Fordman3514]

my niece is 16 and she looks 25. my hubby drools over her. I have her wear skirts w no panties drives him crazy. lol

[muminlawslover]

Originally Posted by Fordman3514

my niece is 16 and she looks 25. my hubby drools over her. I have her wear skirts w no panties drives him crazy. lol

I'd love to be your hubby

[oliviarochelle]

I'm fresh out of high school! I love to dress sexy

[bloodonthemoon]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

Uncommon, no. Bad? Only if you don't mind prison

[bloodonthemoon]

Originally Posted by oliviarochelle

I'm fresh out of high school! I love to dress sexy

And we love to look at you babe. But just look!

[Glory Me]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

Because we do lust after jail bait.

[Samurai120]

Well the age of consent in Canada is 16...soo...:D

[JadeM]

Originally Posted by Samurai120

Well the age of consent in Canada is 16...soo...:D

Keep in mind though that if in a position of responsibility the age is 17 and under. That means 18 if you have any authority or responsibility relating to her. Case law has been taking some pretty broad interpretations of that too, and not in favour of allowing it.

It can make romance at McDonalds dangerous lol.

[larrydownunder]

I dont care what you call it, LUST JAIL BAIT NATURAL HORMONES. All I know is I find younger sooooooooo hot. Have had some wonderful experiences with young women and it gets me so hard.

[JadeM]

Just to add some clarification from a Canadian Legal point of view:
(Cut and pasted right from the CGov website.)

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the "age of consent" or "age of protection" mean?

The age of consent, also known as the "age of protection", refers to the age at which a young person can legally consent to sexual activity. All sexual activity without consent, regardless of age, is a criminal offence.

To what kind of sexual activity does this apply?
The age of consent laws apply to all forms of sexual activity, ranging from sexual touching (e.g., kissing) to sexual intercourse.

What is Canada's age of consent?
The age of consent for sexual activity is 16 years. It was raised from 14 years on May 1, 2008 by the Tackling Violent Crime Act.
However, the age of consent is 18 years where the sexual activity "exploits" the young person -- when it involves prostitution, pornography or occurs in a relationship of authority, trust or dependency (e.g., with a teacher, coach or babysitter). Sexual activity can also be considered exploitative based on the nature and circumstances of the relationship, e.g., the young person's age, the age difference between the young person and their partner, how the relationship developed (quickly, secretly, or over the Internet) and how the partner may have controlled or influenced the young person.

Are there any exceptions to this?
The Criminal Code provides "close in age" or "peer group" exceptions.
For example, a 14 or 15 year old can consent to sexual activity with a partner as long as the partner is less than five years older and there is no relationship of trust, authority or dependency or any other exploitation of the young person. This means that if the partner is 5 years or older than the 14 or 15 year old, any sexual activity will be considered a criminal offence unless it occurs after they are married to each other (in accordance with the "solemnization" of marriage requirements that are established in each province and territory, governing how and when a marriage can be performed, including the minimum age at which someone may marry).
There is also a "close-in-age" exception for 12 and 13 year olds: a 12 or 13 year old can consent to sexual activity with another young person who is less than two years older and with whom there is no relationship of trust, authority or dependency or other exploitation of the young person.

Are 16 and 17 year olds also protected against sexual exploitation?
The Criminal Code protects 16 and 17 year olds against sexual exploitation, where the sexual activity occurs within a relationship of trust, authority, dependency or where there is other exploitation. Whether a relationship is considered to be exploiting the 16 or 17 year old will depend upon the nature and circumstances of the relationship, e.g., the age of the young person, the age difference between the young person and their partner, how the relationship developed and how the partner may have controlled or influenced the young person. As well, 16 and 17 year olds cannot consent to sexual activity that involves prostitution or pornography.

[JadeM]

Originally Posted by pvtdox

If we're not supposed to lust after jail bait, why is there so much porn that caters to that fantasy. Is it not as bad or uncommon as we think?

For the same reason there is porn catering to so many other fantasies (taboo stuff, teachers, fireman, cops, interracial). Because everyone has some naughty fantasy. As long as there is a dollar to be made by creating porn that caters to these, or does a good job of faking illegal ones (like parent/child incest) then you will see it made.

I guess that's the money talks answer. lol.

[Stephaninawe]

So long as shes at least 16, it's legal enough..

[mrtoytek]

Ever been to jail? It's no fun. And banging underage pussy gets you prison. !0 times worse. You're better off finding a young looking LEGAL girl and maybe buy her a cheerleader outfit and get her to put her hair in ponytails, like they do in porn.

[Prince Of Time]

That's what I love about these high school girls, man. I keep getting older, but they stay the same age.

[hot4fam]

Umpire, averages are fairly useless without standard deviations. If the average is 21 a and the standard deviation 3 months, sure, girls married older than their teens. If that deviation is in years, then young marriages become more and more common.

Without knowing ranges ad deviations, simply saying the average was 21 or 22 doesn't tell us much. Add one or two 30 year holds in and the "normal" age gets much lower.

[oliviarochelle]

i'm fresh out of high school, but i like older men. they mostly know what they are doing.

[lilgirllover27]

we just got it wrong, dont we all wish they were legal

[Hush]

Originally Posted by lilgirllover27

...

FAIL!

Walk away from this one post account and never use it again due to the nickname you have chosen.

Hush.....an alias

[Hush]

edit:

Originally Posted by Hush

FAIL!

Walk away from this one post account and never use it again due to the nickname you have chosen.

Hush.....an alias

Originally Posted by lilgirllover27

would love to rape a few girls i know

DOUBLE FAIL!

Walk away from this NOW two post account and never use it again due to the nickname you have chosen and consistantly predatory posts.


Hush......an alias

[Hush]

Originally Posted by Hush

edit:

DOUBLE FAIL!

Walk away from this NOW two post account and never use it again due to the nickname you have chosen and consistantly predatory posts.


Hush......an alias

Originally Posted by lilgirllover27

I would have to say 15. they are old enough were there starting to grow up.

TRIPLE FAIL!

Walk away from this NOW three post account and never use it again due to the nickname you have chosen and consistantly predatory posts.


Hush.....an alias

[lilgirllover27]

lol nothing better to do hush

[Hush]

Why are you posting......Three strikes......You're out.

Hush.......an alias

[lilgirllover27]

ive done nothing wrong

[Supersoftball]

There is no trouble in lusting after JB, I question those who don't and those who do not admit that they do. I have a healthy sexual attraction to girls, women, and ladies, no matter their age.....I will engage them if possible....