Underage stories

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Daddycums

I was responding to your responses to me. And you did call me a dumbass, after all.

I was responding to Prurient Purveyer. I usually save my name-calling for those who "draw first blood" by attacking and name-calling first or who display troll-like behavior like the "wee man."

I'm talking about doing, not thinking. I'm not going to explain myself again, though; I'm tired of dealing with people who heatedly argue that I'm wrong without really attempting to challenge my opinion. Too bad; I want my opinion challenged. I want to be proven wrong once in a while so that I can change my world view so that it's grounded in logic and facts instead of just stubbornness. But instead I get people arguing a position that is only tangentially related.

Do you really think that it's healthy and right for grown men and women to even think of underage kids in a sexual way?

I don't.

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

I was responding to Prurient Purveyer. I usually save my name-calling for those who "draw first blood" by attacking and name-calling first or who display troll-like behavior like the "wee man."

Do you really think that it's healthy and right for grown men and women to even think of underage kids in a sexual way?

I don't.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that you hurt me with this troll post, you worthless piece of shit?

Shemales have always been only a fantasy.

Fantasy isn't real life, asswipe.

Welcome to the real world, Joe.

[Wee Hector]

Okay, Joe. Let's now put that into the context of the present discussion.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that you hurt me with this troll post, you worthless piece of shit?

My rape stories have always been only a fantasy.

Fantasy isn't real life, asswipe.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that you hurt me with this troll post, you worthless piece of shit?

My incest stories have always been only a fantasy.

Fantasy isn't real life, asswipe.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that you hurt me with this troll post, you worthless piece of shit?

My coming-of-age stories have always been only a fantasy.

Fantasy isn't real life, asswipe.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that you hurt me with this troll post, you worthless piece of shit?

My necrophilia stories have always been only a fantasy.

Fantasy isn't real life, asswipe.

Beginning to get the message that people have been trying to get through to you?

[JoeDirty]

I don't like putting anyone on ignore. You still know that they're posting something. Also, they could be spreading bullshit about a subject that needs to be refuted...or making personal attacks that need to be confronted. Just like the following from a jackass....

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

Welcome to the real world, Joe.

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

Okay, Joe. Let's now put that into the context of the present discussion.

Beginning to get the message that people have been trying to get through to you?

The fact still remains that you're lusting and jerking off to the depictions of underage kids in sexual situations.

And that---asswipe---makes you a pedo.

[Daddycums]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

I was responding to Prurient Purveyer. I usually save my name-calling for those who "draw first blood" by attacking and name-calling first or who display troll-like behavior like the "wee man."

Go back and look at who you were responding to when you used the word "dumbass". It was me. Since you're denying it, I'll assume that you got confused and didn't realize who you were talking to at the time. Understandable; you've got a lot of enemies on this thread.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Do you really think that it's healthy and right for grown men and women to even think of underage kids in a sexual way?

I don't.

Depends on what you mean by underage. Seventeen? Sixteen? Perfectly normal. Fifteen? Fourteen? Not unreasonable. Thirteen? Twelve? Now we're really starting to push it. Eleven? I'll admit I've actually written a story involving a girl that young, but I've never been attracted to a real girl of that age.

As I've said before in previous posts, I don't think there's anything particularly abnormal about being sexually attracted to any girl that has reached puberty. There are limits, of course. For example:

a. If it becomes an obsession. As long as the guy is mostly attracted to grown women and it's only the occasional teenager that catches his eye, he's fine.

b. If he's sexually attracted to prepubescent kids. For most of us, we're hardwired to appreciate sexual attributes, and young kids don't have any.

c. If thoughts lead to actions. Show me a man who has sex with a thirteen year old girl, and I'll show you a man that makes a good argument for castration as a legal form of punishment.

So yes, aside from the three exceptions above, I think it's healthy and normal for a grown person to think of underage kids in a sexual way. In fact, it's more common than your fascination with shemales.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Daddycums

Go back and look at who you were responding to when you used the word "dumbass". It was me. Since you're denying it, I'll assume that you got confused and didn't realize who you were talking to at the time. Understandable; you've got a lot of enemies on this thread.

I stand corrected.

However, I was still responding to PP in that quote that you responded to.

Depends on what you mean by underage. Seventeen? Sixteen? Perfectly normal. Fifteen? Fourteen? Not unreasonable. Thirteen? Twelve? Now we're really starting to push it. Eleven? I'll admit I've actually written a story involving a girl that young, but I've never been attracted to a real girl of that age.

As I've said before in previous posts, I don't think there's anything particularly abnormal about being sexually attracted to any girl that has reached puberty. There are limits, of course. For example:

a. If it becomes an obsession. As long as the guy is mostly attracted to grown women and it's only the occasional teenager that catches his eye, he's fine.

b. If he's sexually attracted to prepubescent kids. For most of us, we're hardwired to appreciate sexual attributes, and young kids don't have any.

c. If thoughts lead to actions. Show me a man who has sex with a thirteen year old girl, and I'll show you a man that makes a good argument for castration as a legal form of punishment.

So yes, aside from the three exceptions above, I think it's healthy and normal for a grown person to think of underage kids in a sexual way. In fact, it's more common than your fascination with shemales.

It's still not a good thing to promote or encourage such things. Underage stories do just that.

[McDick]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

The fact still remains that you're lusting and jerking off to the depictions of underage kids in sexual situations.

And that---asswipe---makes you a pedo.

So what? Do you feel that what people are thinking about while jerking off is something that should be controlled and regulated? How about guys who jerk off while thinking about having sex with another man who's popped a few estrogen pills? Should that be outlawed also?

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

I don't like putting anyone on ignore. You still know that they're posting something. Also, they could be spreading bullshit about a subject that needs to be refuted...or making personal attacks that need to be confronted. Just like the following from a jackass....



The fact still remains that you're lusting and jerking off to the depictions of underage kids in sexual situations.

And that---asswipe---makes you a pedo.

Whick means that jerking off to shemale photos makes you gay.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

Whick means that jerking off to shemale photos makes you gay.

Does it? Honestly? Ooh better go and arrange those flowers then dumpling,won't be a moment.

Just to get back to the original topic, we approach the idea of people under the age of 16 being involved in sexual acts with our social background. So for those of us from a Western Civilization the expectation is a girl will be schooled till age sixteen, or seventeen then go on to a tertiary institution or go out to work, start dating, meet a nice boy and somewhere around her early or mid twenties she might look at settling down.

So for us she is a child until,say, sixteen and therefore off limits for any porn story.

Fair enough, but in the rest of the world she's not that lucky.

Have a look at ages of marriage and you will find they get very young. In one place Qatar,I think it was, the age at which full intercourse could take place was nine but was changed to "when she was physically capable of having intercourse" so some would be older, some younger.

Do you find that horrifying? Made me want to vomit but its a fact and if you were to go and call them Pedos or whatever they would be horrified and talk of centuries of tradition and doing things correctly according to Islam and so on.

So the reality is young girls are involved in sex. Is that a reason to change the age limits here?

Well clearly it is but the chances of it happening are nil so its a waste of breath asking but the point is the Western viewpoint its just one social view and it is not universal.

[JoeDirty]

Pedo Purveyer already dealt with your dumbass comment, wee man.

And...

Nobody can control what people think, McDickhead. That still doesn't mean that it's ok to condone or to encourage such sick, evil thinking.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Pedo Purveyer already dealt with your dumbass comment, wee man.

And...

Nobody can control what people think, McDickhead. That still doesn't mean that it's ok to condone or to encourage such sick, evil thinking.

OK, thanks Joe, now can we hear from someone with a functioning brain?

Anyone?

[McDick]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Nobody can control what people think, McDickhead. That still doesn't mean that it's ok to condone or to encourage such sick, evil thinking.

That's just your opinion. In my opinion, I believe that it is ok to condone the freedom to have and express thoughts. Even the bad, sick and evil ones. Especially the bad, sick and evil ones. I'm not afraid of thoughts. You are.

That's because I actually believe in freedom of thought and expression and speech. You clearly loathe such principles. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but don't expect universal agreement of your beliefs from others.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Prurient Purveyer

OK, thanks Joe, now can we hear from someone with a functioning brain?

Anyone?

Apparently the internet is only good for downloading porn.

It sure as hell isn't good for reasoned discussion. Especially when one is trying to reason with insane people like you and the rest of the pedo advocates here.

Originally Posted by McDick

That's just your opinion. In my opinion, I believe that it is ok to condone the freedom to have and express thoughts. Even the bad, sick and evil ones. Especially the bad, sick and evil ones. I'm not afraid of thoughts. You are.

That's because I actually believe in freedom of thought and expression and speech. You clearly loathe such principles. That's your opinion and you're entitled to it, but don't expect universal agreement of your beliefs from others.

The 1st Amendment applies to political speech, asswipe. I don't think that the framers meant it to include speech about sexually molesting little kids in a positive, condoning way. In fact, I KNOW that they didn't have that in mind.

To condone or speak positively of something so horrid and depiscable as pedophilia shows one to be a lowlife.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Apparently the internet is only good for downloading porn.

It sure as hell isn't good for reasoned discussion. Especially when one is trying to reason with insane people like you and the rest of the pedo advocates here.

The 1st Amendment applies to political speech, asswipe. I don't think that the framers meant it to include speech about sexually molesting little kids in a positive, condoning way. In fact, I KNOW that they didn't have that in mind.

To condone or speak positively of something so horrid and depiscable as pedophilia shows one to be a lowlife.

When exactly did you start to try and reason Joe?

[McDick]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

The 1st Amendment applies to political speech, asswipe. I don't think that the framers meant it to include speech about sexually molesting little kids in a positive, condoning way. In fact, I KNOW that they didn't have that in mind.

To condone or speak positively of something so horrid and depiscable as pedophilia shows one to be a lowlife.

No, you are wrong. The 1st Amendment does not apply only to political speech. Have you ever read the 1st amendment? You should if you haven't, but be forewarned...it might scare you when you realize everything it implies.

The framers knew all about naughty writings. Erotic writings have been around for thousands of years. This didn't just get invented with the internet. Yet the framers did not make any exceptions for unpleasant ideas.

[Daddycums]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

I stand corrected.

However, I was still responding to PP in that quote that you responded to.

No problem. Mistakes happen.

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

It's still not a good thing to promote or encourage such things. Underage stories do just that.

Once again, you simply reiterate your opinion while completely ignoring my point. Oh well. Just one more failed attempt to get someone to engage in meaningful debate.

[knotsrit]

Originally Posted by clarise

What is negrophilia? Sex with negroes?

That's illegal? Doesn't sound so bad. Might be nice for a change of hue.

I love sex with big firm titted hairy pussied black women but I can't find any! Please help me ladies.

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by knotsrit

I love sex with big firm titted hairy pussied black women but I can't find any! Please help me ladies.

Wrong place. Try the Personals forum.

[Fundoken]

Maybe it's the vulnerability and innocent aspect of the underage.

[Daubin]

Stories are just stories since it isn't real it doesn't matter what it depicts. I suspect however that the real reason some people want to ban child sex stories is so that they will not read them. People often are what they profess to loath or hate.

[Bearaptor]

What Daubin said....it's just fucking stories you idiot moralistic hypocrites. Personally i like to read the really brutal twisted shit, does that mean I will actually do it? NO U FUCKING MORONS

[Limloom]

Originally Posted by Charltsexman

Sorry miss spelling necrophillia is what I meant haha woops !!!

Oh wow.. So your into munching on maggots from cold leather skinned corpse?

[Limloom]

People into phoedophilia and necrophilia, honestly need to seek help. Maybe put incestial couplings in the same boat, but not on the same cabin.