Clearly There's A Way Around The "No Pedo Stories" Rule

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Dizzyworks673

...[A]re you trying to prevoke me into more fighting?...[A]re you really incapable of not having the last word?

Nope. I'm not trying you provoke you into more fighting. I was using your post to deal with something that I see lots of here.... Posters building strawmen to attack rather than dealing with the actual arguments.

Yes. I'm incapable of not having the last word when I'm dealing with people who are wrong. Especially when they are wrong regarding matters of a sick fuck nature...like thinking that it's ok to have sexual thoughts and desires about little kids.

Originally Posted by nano364

shut the fuck up already. how are you gona make a thread demanding that this "sic pedo fuck" write better stories.....

Are you Dizzyworks sock? Both of you are in serious need of taking a Reading Comprehension class.

This thread isn't a thread trying to get EL-P or any other sick fuck pedo strory writer to write better sick fuck pedo stories. As the thread title CLEARLY states it's a thread pointing out that there's a way around the "no pedo stories" rule. Just be liked by the right people and one can get away with all sorts of shit....

[ELaken-Palmer]

...

[wantsomefun]

I understand what you did here, since you've done it before with a few very short stories like this -- misled the reader about the relative age of the characters, only to reveal that everyone is an adult at the end. You had several role-play stories that you tossed out when 33black and SpecialNeedsKay were saying a lot of the same stuff Joe does now.

The story is well-constructed, with lots of emotive passages and forbidden sex, all building to the zinger at the end. I knew it was coming -- the mention of her thin back and wide ass was the give-away. All nicely done, with some wry humor in classic ELP style.

But why would you post it HERE? Why escalate the fight again?



@JoeDirty -- You should read this. It's NOT a "pedo" story at all, although you're allowed to think it is. And I swear to you, there is absolutely nothing in this story about you.

Read it. Do you agree that this story is something of a written equivalent of your pics?

You're confident that all your pics are legal, and I'm sure that's correct. You like a woman with a youthful form, not a six, eight, or ten year old girl, but a teen or very young woman who is slender, petite, and pretty. Her face and/or her figure make her look younger than eighteen. Am I right?

Emerson's story is like that.

[wantsomefun]

Who the hell is the girl in Joe's new av? She looks like an abused child or a tweener zombie!

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by wantsomefun

Who the hell is the girl in Joe's new av? She looks like an abused child or a tweener zombie!

I am afraid to ask but it may be someone close he is abusing. Scary.

_________

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by wantsomefun

...@JoeDirty -- You should read this. It's NOT a "pedo" story at all, although you're allowed to think it is. And I swear to you, there is absolutely nothing in this story about you.

Read it. Do you agree that this story is something of a written equivalent of your pics?

You're confident that all your pics are legal, and I'm sure that's correct. You like a woman with a youthful form, not a six, eight, or ten year old girl, but a teen or very young woman who is slender, petite, and pretty. Her face and/or her figure make her look younger than eighteen. Am I right?

Emerson's story is like that.

I scanned the story. I knew the ending from the very first sentence because EL-P wrote it and he is a predictable writer.

The only people who'd get off on the beginning of the story are those who are "pedo/incest curious" or are full-fledged incestuous pedos. Any person who finds pedophilia/incest sick and vomit-inducing would have stopped reading waaaaaay before the reveal. OTOH I would think that those who are into pedo and incest would get pissed off by the "cop out" ending rather than liking it.

Nope. EL-P's predictable pedo...NOT pedo switcheroo story isn't the same as my posting pics of young-looking-but-legal babes.

Originally Posted by wantsomefun

Who the hell is the girl in Joe's new av? She looks like an abused child or a tweener zombie!

She's one of the girls that I posted in my Mr. Hansen thread.

She looks the way I feel every single time I log on here and have to deal with the nonsense from the likes of EL-P, et al.

[wantsomefun]

I assume I'm part of the et al.

You don't have to deal with it. You could ignore it.

You and Emerson have a very strange relationship. The two of you just love to hate each other, don't you?

Wait a minute. Wait just one fucking minute! Are you guys socks of each other?

[ELaken-Palmer]

I just love to see his reaction when I pull the strings. I've never had such power. He sees my socks everywhere and yet I haven't a single one.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by wantsomefun

I assume I'm part of the et al.

You don't have to deal with it. You could ignore it.

You and Emerson have a very strange relationship. The two of you just love to hate each other, don't you?

Wait a minute. Wait just one fucking minute! Are you guys socks of each other?

No. You aren't part of the et al.

You discuss things rationally. Unlike EL-P who gets his panties all up in a wad and starts shit/spam posting whenever someone doesn't kiss his ass.

There's no way in hell that EL-P could ever be one of my socks. Any socks that I'd have would be way more interesting and have an actual sense of humor.

Originally Posted by wantsomefun

Who the hell is the girl in Joe's new av? She looks like an abused child or a tweener zombie!

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

I am afraid to ask but it may be someone close he is abusing. Scary.

_________

WTF are you blabbering on about, EL-P?

She's a professional model at a professional site. I don't even know her personally.

And there's not one damn thing about this girl that would even imply any abuse. Sheesh!...

300.jpg

[ELaken-Palmer]

My God! Look at the poor, cringing thing. That could be... No. I better not say who I'm sure that is. Poor, little girl.

_________

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

The troll EL-P's pedo story against me is proof of that.

Just write a clearly pedo story but don't mention the actual age of the child.

BTW while I'm at it...

Can't sick fuck pedo writers at least write realistic sick fuck pedo stories? Sorry but I don't think that IRL prepubescent girls could ever undergo things that even 35 year old prostitutes have trouble undergoing.

Actually it didn't get round the rule at all. It was considered to infringe as it was posted and ELP put ages in it to allow it to comply.

So that means you are wrong.

But at least you and dear Clarice are buddies again so that was worthwhile.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Prurient Purveyer

Actually it didn't get round the rule at all. It was considered to infringe as it was posted and ELP put ages in it to allow it to comply.

So that means you are wrong.

But at least you and dear Clarice are buddies again so that was worthwhile.

Go to that thread and reread it...as well as EL-P's comments where he uses the term "pedo" to describe the uncle in the story. Also, it's still pedo because of the implied age of the boy in the story at the time that the events described allegedly occurred.

In addition...

EL-P posted a link in that thread to the unedited, original, rule-infringing, and clearly pedo version of the story on the stories site.

The only response that I ever got from another poster here that was ever in any way semi-rational as to how he could get away with doing this was that since the story is on the stories.xnxx site---and that site is part of xnxx---he can link to it.

My response to such BS is that if someone posted CP on xvideos---and it stayed up for a while until someone notified the Admin to take it down---I HIGHLY DOUBT that I could get away with posting a link to the vid in the Pic & Movie Post section via the same rationale.

[Dizzyworks673]

Ok really why is this all still being talked about? I mean really what does one side of this argument hope to win over the other anymore?

After over 260 comments on this whole subject we haven't made any progress and I will be the first to admit I argued about it for far too long too.

We all know what Elp did Joe as that is the basis for 90% of what you post here. We all know you disagree, Elp as it's been made clear by you. So why is everyone continuing to run in circles on this thread?

I think this whole topic is at a stalemate and isn't going anywhere as the last 200 comments have proved. Can we all just agree to disagree with each other and move on to the next topic of conversation?

Joe is it so important for you to be right or "Win" that you won't just let this go? If not what will it take for this thread to become entirely pointless another 260 comments?

Elp you know by responding to Joe you’re just feeding the fire and the new story you posted to this thread was just adding gas to that fire.

I honestly think all this fighting is driving away the people on this site who actually have something to say. Before long all that will be left on the forum will be a bunch of teenagers looking to skipe.

Joe I don't dislike you or think you’re dumb I just disagree with your point of view as you disagree with mine. That's fine you’re allowed to disagree with me and I you but we don't need to keep fighting about it anymore.

This bickering is costing us all ratings on our threads and stories, it's costing us quality readers and people, I’m asking you and everyone else to stand with me and stop the fighting and move on. There will be no clear cut winner in this battle so let’s just call a truce here and now.

If this thread is truly about the pedo rule and not just getting as many responses as possible then just walk away from all of this now and we can all say that we made our points and said what we had to say, we can all walk away now knowing we fought the good fight. Right here right now Joe and Elp lets call this match a draw and move on.

[darthel0101]

I don't see it happening, Dizzy.

Joe sees himself as having been slandered all over this board and his opinion of himself is so important that he has to defend it.

This is not about pedo stories on XNXX; this is about Joe being accused of being pedo. That is why he changes references when the accusation is made.

He started the row using references identifying anything under legal age as pedo and ended up with his own actions being thrown in his face. Then he mentioned his niece and nephew in that context and the die was cast.

This argument will not go anywhere because Joe has a habit of reading what he wants to read and ignoring the rest.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Go to that thread and reread it...as well as EL-P's comments where he uses the term "pedo" to describe the uncle in the story. Also, it's still pedo because of the implied age of the boy in the story at the time that the events described allegedly occurred.

In addition...

EL-P posted a link in that thread to the unedited, original, rule-infringing, and clearly pedo version of the story on the stories site.

The only response that I ever got from another poster here that was ever in any way semi-rational as to how he could get away with doing this was that since the story is on the stories.xnxx site---and that site is part of xnxx---he can link to it.

My response to such BS is that if someone posted CP on xvideos---and it stayed up for a while until someone notified the Admin to take it down---I HIGHLY DOUBT that I could get away with posting a link to the vid in the Pic & Movie Post section via the same rationale.

Yes I did.The ages in the story are 16 and 15. For a true blue pedo Joe they would be pensioners.

Yes ELP uses the word Pedo and yes its a straight out attack on you but it hasn't got around the no pedo rule so I stand by what I wrote yesterday.

[Kountrygal]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Go to that thread and reread it...as well as EL-P's comments where he uses the term "pedo" to describe the uncle in the story. Also, it's still pedo because of the implied age of the boy in the story at the time that the events described allegedly occurred.

In addition...

EL-P posted a link in that thread to the unedited, original, rule-infringing, and clearly pedo version of the story on the stories site.

The only response that I ever got from another poster here that was ever in any way semi-rational as to how he could get away with doing this was that since the story is on the stories.xnxx site---and that site is part of xnxx---he can link to it.

My response to such BS is that if someone posted CP on xvideos---and it stayed up for a while until someone notified the Admin to take it down---I HIGHLY DOUBT that I could get away with posting a link to the vid in the Pic & Movie Post section via the same rationale.

DAMN GIVE IT A REST, You keep contradicting yourself. END OF DISCUSSION. I agree with EJP. Bye Looser.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Prurient Purveyer

Yes I did.The ages in the story are 16 and 15. For a true blue pedo Joe they would be pensioners.

Yes ELP uses the word Pedo and yes its a straight out attack on you but it hasn't got around the no pedo rule so I stand by what I wrote yesterday.

Oh...I now see what that fucker EL-P did.

He resubmitted the story....

Then on July 4th I posted a reply pointing out this sentence in the resubmitted story....

The boy couldn't have been much older than thirteen himself.

Then---one day later---on July 5th he RESUBMITTED the resubmitted story changing "thirteen" to "fifteen"...AFTER I had called him out on the carpet for it still being a pedo story.

I never saw that he had done that because I never went back and reread it.

The fact that Ejls is the one who edited EL-P's OP on July 5th shows exactly what I've been saying about how certain people in authority here will bend over backwards for certain posters and give them lots of leeway....



BTW the link to the original unedited pedo story is still there in the thread. That story has this line in it....

This was strong talk coming from a girl who must have been all of thirteen.


Thus my points regarding EL-P getting around the "no pedo rule" and being given preferential treatment still stand....

Originally Posted by Kountrygal

DAMN GIVE IT A REST, You keep contradicting yourself. END OF DISCUSSION. I agree with EJP. Bye Looser.

First... His initials are EL-P. Not EJP. Get ur fax str8.

Second... Assertion AIN'T proof. You've asserted that I've contradicted myself. Yet you give NO PROOF. Ziltch. Zero. Nada.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Oh...I now see what that fucker EL-P did.

He resubmitted the story....

Then on July 4th I posted a reply pointing out this sentence in the resubmitted story....

The boy couldn't have been much older than thirteen himself.

Then---one day later---on July 5th he RESUBMITTED the resubmitted story changing "thirteen" to "fifteen"...AFTER I had called him out on the carpet for it still being a pedo story.

I never saw that he had done that because I never went back and reread it.

The fact that Ejls is the one who edited EL-P's OP on July 5th shows exactly what I've been saying about how certain people in authority here will bend over backwards for certain posters and give them lots of leeway....



BTW the link to the original unedited pedo story is still there in the thread. That story has this line in it....

This was strong talk coming from a girl who must have been all of thirteen.


Thus my points regarding EL-P getting around the "no pedo rule" and being given preferential treatment still stand....

First... His initials are EL-P. Not EJP. Get ur fax str8.

Second... Assertion AIN'T proof. You've asserted that I've contradicted myself. Yet you give NO PROOF. Ziltch. Zero. Nada.

The bottom line to all this Joe is that he wasn't allowed to leave the story as he originally submitted it and ,yes, maybe it took a little while but he wasn't able to get round the no pedo story rule.

Review is a manual process so it will always take a little time but there is a system and it does work.

[JoeDirty]

EL-P...

From this point onward I'll leave you and your socks to your own little fiefdom that you've been allowed to establish for yourself here in the least popular section of XNXX...the Sex Stories section.

I've made my point. Over and over. Now only those who are willfully blind will continue to not see.

I only ask one thing of you...and I'll leave you alone for good....

STOP IT. CALL OFF YOUR DOGS. TELL THEM TO LEAVE MY THREADS IN THE POPULAR PIC & MOVIE POST SECTION ALONE. STOP IT WITH YOUR SPITEFUL THREAD RATING VOTE DOWNS.

I don't vote down YOUR threads. In fact...I don't even hardly take notice of them. I suggest that you do the same to mine and put me on your Ignore List just like I have you on mine.

You leave me the fuck alone...and I'll forget that you even exist.

[ELaken-Palmer]

Joe, I graciously accept your capitulation in this matter and (from this point on) I will never comment on, add to, or subtract anything from anything you post. I will also pledge not to subtract any of your rating stars. In fact, I will totally ignore you altogether... as long as you never post another negative or disparaging post or thread in this SEX STORIES forum or add anything more to this thread.

Everyone witness this: I will not post a thing concerning JoeDirty until he first posts derogatory statements (about any story, theme or writer) in this SEX STORY forum.

ELP
7-30-2012
_________