Supporters of a ban on a ban on pedophile stories threads

[ELaken-Palmer]

Count me in.

[ahorsewithnoname]

Basically, if the amount of comments that were made in that thread were spread around to the actual stories in this forum, I think there'd be more happy writers.

Can we just call it a draw and move on?

[ELaken-Palmer]

No. It just keeps going and it's a moo point (as Joey would say).

[Hornycountryboy]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

No. It just keeps going and it's a moo point (as Joey would say).

Hahaha I agree, and I really loved that show, even Joey's "moo point" which made sense

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=fLwYpSCrlHU

[Cheltenham]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Count me in.

+1

If certain people don't support a story thematically, then show which ones you do like.

If other certain people support a story, show which ones you like.

And never the twain shall meet.

[hornypixy]

i don't know, i actually like watching people insult each other's opinions! im actually avidly awaiting the 'yo mama's so fat' comments.

[ELaken-Palmer]

They just keep the ban posts coming.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Count me in.

AB SO LUTE LY

[snowleopard3200]

Same here, I am in agreement; this matter has been pounded flatter than dust with dust upon it. Let the matter end, the site has its rules and thus that is the way the field is set for play and writing.

Those who wish to debate or argue the matter longer should take it up with the administration and let the rest of us who write or read focus on the main purpose of the sight - great erotic stories.

[ELaken-Palmer]

More support please.

[JoeDirty]

EL-P...

Trying to take away free speech from people with whom you disagree is typical of people who have no logical leg upon which to stand.

Silencing one's critics instead of trying to refute them with reason is what dictators do.

You, Sir, are an asswipe.

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

EL-P...

Trying to take away free speech from people with whom you disagree is typical of people who have no logical leg upon which to stand.

Silencing one's critics instead of trying to refute them with reason is what dictators do.

You, Sir, are an asswipe.

I think you simply meant to say...

so we'll take it as that.

[JoeDirty]

You just proved my point, asswipe.

An ad hominem or a personal attack is NOT a refutation.

You, Sir, are incapable of reason and logic....

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

EL-P...

Trying to take away free speech from people with whom you disagree is typical of people who have no logical leg upon which to stand.

Silencing one's critics instead of trying to refute them with reason is what dictators do.

You, Sir, are an asswipe.

Well said, Joe. I agree with you 100%. Just a pity that you don't live by your own beliefs. You don't like what others write so you want it banned. You don't want others to have freedom of speech; have their stories banned from the site. Don't refute them with reason but instead dictate that they are asswipes.

However great to know that we believe in the same things.

[1BadDaddy]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

EL-P...

Trying to take away free speech from people with whom you disagree is typical of people who have no logical leg upon which to stand.

Silencing one's critics instead of trying to refute them with reason is what dictators do.

You, Sir, are an asswipe.

Come on Joe! You can't be serious!

Your whole purpose for coming here is to deny freedom of speech to those with whom you disagree. That's what you've been doing for months. Now, all of a sudden, you want to hide behind the concept of freedom of speech? Something you despise. Something you're completely opposed to.

Remember Joe, the first amendment was written to protect folks from people like you. It's absurd that you would pretend to support freedom of speech now. Please try to be honest with yourself.

[blueheatt]

bbbbbump

[timmy13]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Count me in.

Myself as well.

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by timmy13

Myself as well.

Et tu, Timmy13?

[m21]

i agree

[darthel0101]

The issue IS a dead horse. I will support the ban.

It's not our playground, the admins have opened it for us to enjoy. If we do not play by their rules then we don't play. Leave the statement in the forum rules and let it go at that; it is not up for debate.

Doesn't mean that I have to like censorship, but if I want to stick around then I have to live with the judgements.

I DID have to laugh at Joe's statement

Trying to take away free speech from people with whom you disagree is typical of people who have no logical leg upon which to stand.

Silencing one's critics instead of trying to refute them with reason is what dictators do.

because that is exactly what censorship does.

There is none so blind as he who will not see.

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by darthel0101

The issue IS a dead horse. I will support the ban.

It's not our playground, the admins have opened it for us to enjoy. If we do not play by their rules then we don't play. Leave the statement in the forum rules and let it go at that; it is not up for debate.

Doesn't mean that I have to like censorship, but if I want to stick around then I have to live with the judgements.

I DID have to laugh at Joe's statement
because that is exactly what censorship does.

There is none so blind as he who will not see.

The main point of the argument is that Joe and people like him are trying to redefine the word "paedophilia". Just because they happen to live in states where the legal age is 18 they consider that any activity with anyone under that age is paedophile.

Try asking Joe what the difference is between a 14 year-old made up to look like an 18 year-old and an 18 year-old made-up to look like a 14 year-old. He'll happily wank himself silly over what looks like a 14 year-old while hypocritically pointing out that it's okay as she is 18.

It's the same with his obsession with shemales. They may look like young girls while at the same time having a raging hard-on but Joe reckons it isn't gay because they're pumped full of hormones. What I'd like to know is if they are so full of female hormones how the hell they can get a hard-on anyway.

No point arguing with him as he keeps churning out the same old BS.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

The main point of the argument is that Joe and people like him are trying to redefine the word "paedophilia". Just because they happen to live in states where the legal age is 18 they consider that any activity with anyone under that age is paedophile.

Try asking Joe what the difference is between a 14 year-old made up to look like an 18 year-old and an 18 year-old made-up to look like a 14 year-old. He'll happily wank himself silly over what looks like a 14 year-old while hypocritically pointing out that it's okay as she is 18.

It's the same with his obsession with shemales. They may look like young girls while at the same time having a raging hard-on but Joe reckons it isn't gay because they're pumped full of hormones. What I'd like to know is if they are so full of female hormones how the hell they can get a hard-on anyway.

No point arguing with him as he keeps churning out the same old BS.

Listen, weeman.

I've already 'splained that there are two different uses of "pedo." There's the strict clinical definition (prepubescent lusters)...and there's the definition used by LEA's (and our own Mod Ejls). Try telling a cop who catches you diddling a 13 year old girl "Hey! I'm NOT a pedo! She's past puberty!" and see how far ya' get.

Also, the issue ISN'T how old someone LOOKS. It's how old they ARE. A 12 year old girl who looks like she's 20 is STILL A 12 YEAR OLD GIRL.

In addition, you seem to have a BIG ASS HANGUP about my shemale fetish. Per the dumbass logic of many of the posters here you must secretly want to get fucked in the ass by a well-hung tranny.

[darthel0101]

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

trying to redefine the word "paedophilia"

There is a reason for legal dictionaries
[comments removed to prevent derailing of this thread]

[darthel0101]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Try telling a cop who catches you diddling a 13 year old girl "Hey! I'm NOT a pedo! She's past puberty!" and see how far ya' get.

yep, redefining - not only the term but the job.
I am relatively new here and this guy is about ready to be permanently ignored. Would I really be missing anything?

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Listen, weeman.

I've already 'splained that there are two different uses of "pedo." There's the strict clinical definition (prepubescent lusters)...and there's the definition used by LEA's (and our own Mod Eljs). Try telling a cop who catches you diddling a 13 year old girl "Hey! I'm NOT a pedo! She's past puberty!" and see how far ya' get.

Also, the issue ISN'T how old someone LOOKS. It's how old they ARE. A 12 year old girl who looks like she's 20 is STILL A 12 YEAR OLD GIRL.

In addition, you seem to have a BIG ASS HANGUP about my shemale fetish. Per the dumbass logic of many of the posters here you must secretly want to get fucked in the ass by a well-hung tranny.

Just get things straight, Joe. There are not two uses of "paedo". It is a perfectly defined legal term which is dealt with by law. It doesn't matter what the cop thinks; it is up to the judge to decide.

You however forgot the "third" use of the term, which is your very own, which concerns everyone under the age of 18.

What you don't seem to get is that in a way I agree with you. When I first joined this site 18 months ago I discovered an enormous number of paedo stories getting very high scores and decided that I should try as well. When the ban came in I asked for all my stories to be pulled, which they were. Of all the stories I wrote at the time I regret only one of them and that was a historical story told very sympathetically from the victim's point of view.

Do I write paedo stories now? No!
Will I write any in the future? No!
Do I read paedo stories? No!
Am I a paedo? No!
Do I watch sex videos? Perhaps 1 or 2 a year.

As for the age of girls in videos we are not talking about having sex with the girl in question but with looking at photos or vids and imagining what she might be like. Maybe you are different from every other man who visits sex sites but for all the rest they don't give a damn what her real age is; if she looks like she is 14 then in their minds she is 14. It's just like your Shemales; they are men with big stiff cocks but you still believe they are women with big stiff cocks. And the younger they look the better.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by darthel0101

There is a reason for legal dictionaries
[comments removed to prevent derailing of this thread]

Originally Posted by darthel0101

yep, redefining - not only the term but the job.
I am relatively new here and this guy is about ready to be permanently ignored. Would I really be missing anything?

For one thing you'd be missing some threads of mine in the Pic & Movie Post section.

But if you're an underage luster or a defender of them then go ahead and put me on Ignore. I won't miss ya'.

I'm about done with you sick and twisted bastards anyway.

[ELaken-Palmer]

WARNING:

[JoeDirty]

EL-P...

Until you respond with posts which aren't just stupid personal attacks and ad homs I won't be responding to you.

+++++++++++++

Now I need to go back and deal with something....

Originally Posted by darthel0101

yep, redefining - not only the term but the job....

Explain exactly HOW I'm "redefining" the term as used by LEA's and the job of a cop to catch said 'pedos" as defined by LEA's.

If you can't explain this then I'll assume that you're just spouting bullshit like so many of the others here.

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

Just get things straight, Joe. There are not two uses of "paedo". It is a perfectly defined legal term which is dealt with by law....

From The Fount of All Human Knowledge....

"In law enforcement circles, the term "pedophile" is sometimes used in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Definitions

You however forgot the "third" use of the term, which is your very own, which concerns everyone under the age of 18.

Nope. See above. "Legally underage."

As for the age of girls in videos we are not talking about having sex with the girl in question but with looking at photos or vids and imagining what she might be like. Maybe you are different from every other man who visits sex sites but for all the rest they don't give a damn what her real age is; if she looks like she is 14 then in their minds she is 14. It's just like your Shemales; they are men with big stiff cocks but you still believe they are women with big stiff cocks. And the younger they look the better.

I do like 'em young. Who the fuck doesn't?

But I'm not imagining that they're 14. I know that they're barely legal. They just look like jailbait. So I'm imagining them as what they are...barely legal, baby-faced cuties with tight little bodies, assholes, and pussies. The imagination is that I'M FUCKING THEM AND NOT JUST JERKING OFF TO PORN.

OTOH the pedo story readers are---IN FACT---imagining that THEY'RE FUCKING LITTLE KIDS.

Big. Ass. Difference.

[blueheatt]

bump

[F-Star]

Signed. I just got here and I'm already nauseated by the argument.

[darthel0101]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

From The Fount of All Human Knowledge....

"In law enforcement circles, the term "pedophile" is sometimes used in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Definitions

"pick -n- choose"
a old standard for those who want to stifle debate. Take the desired references and ignore the rest.


Here's a pail of sand in which to bury your microcephalic head.

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

EL-P...

Until you respond with posts which aren't just stupid personal attacks and ad homs I won't be responding to you.

+++++++++++++

Now I need to go back and deal with something....
Explain exactly HOW I'm "redefining" the term as used by LEA's and the job of a cop to catch said 'pedos" as defined by LEA's.

If you can't explain this then I'll assume that you're just spouting bullshit like so many of the others here.

From The Fount of All Human Knowledge....

"In law enforcement circles, the term "pedophile" is sometimes used in a broad manner to encompass a person who commits one or more sexually-based crimes that relate to legally underage victims...."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia#Definitions



Nope. See above. "Legally underage."

I do like 'em young. Who the fuck doesn't?

But I'm not imagining that they're 14. I know that they're barely legal. They just look like jailbait. So I'm imagining them as what they are...barely legal, baby-faced cuties with tight little bodies, assholes, and pussies. The imagination is that I'M FUCKING THEM AND NOT JUST JERKING OFF TO PORN.

OTOH the pedo story readers are---IN FACT---imagining that THEY'RE FUCKING LITTLE KIDS.

Big. Ass. Difference.

Then the question arises "why watch videos of 18 year-olds who are made up to look like 14 year-olds"? Surely you should be looking at videos where tha participants look their real age.

[blueheatt]

bump

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by darthel0101

"pick -n- choose"
a old standard for those who want to stifle debate. Take the desired references and ignore the rest.


Here's a pail of sand in which to bury your microcephalic head.

I was showing that you idgits are picking nits.

If you can't get your pea-sized brains around the idea that a term can have a technical meaning and a less-than-technical one just replace "pedo" with "legally underage/children" in all of my posts.

Originally Posted by Wee Hector

Then the question arises "why watch videos of 18 year-olds who are made up to look like 14 year-olds"?

Because it's fuckin' hawt.

[Sydpart5]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

They just keep the ban posts coming.

I used to be a sadistic necrophile with a penchant for beastiliaty but after awhile I realized I was just beating a dead horse...

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by Sydpart5

I used to be a sadistic necrophile with a penchant for beastiliaty but after awhile I realized I was just beating a dead horse...

Right you are. And we need to keep Joe Dirty's brand of underage, cross-dressing, butt-worshipping, man-boy pedophilia off this forum... if we can. Will you help us?

[darthel0101]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Right you are. And we need to keep Joe Dirty's brand of underage, cross-dressing, butt-worshipping, man-boy pedophilia off this forum... if we can. Will you help us?

He doesn't realize that his preference for videos of "those who appear to be younger than they actually are" is as bad psychologically as acknowledging that he likes 'em young.

I pity the self-deluding prick.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by darthel0101

He doesn't realize that his preference for videos of "those who appear to be younger than they actually are" is as bad psychologically as acknowledging that he likes 'em young....

No. It's not, asswipe.

Let me prove it....

Here's a naked whore....

2.jpg

Does she look underage to you?

Well...I want to fuck her.

Now here's that exact same whore....

46.jpg

Again...it's the exact same whore. A non-underage whore whom I know is non-underage.

The only difference is that whereas I wanted to fuck her before now I REALLY WANT TO FUCK HER.

I rest my case.

[ELaken-Palmer]

He is so fucking stupid that he just proves his own point and doesn't see it! Joe Dirty gets a hard-on looking at pictures of girls who look underage. Therefore his is attracted to underage girls. He is a pedophile of the very worst kind! See above.

And don't allow any children near him, PLEASE!

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

He is so fucking stupid that he just proves his own point and doesn't see it! Joe Dirty gets a hard-on looking at pictures of girls who look underage. Therefore his is attracted to underage girls. He is a pedophile of the very worst kind! See above.

And don't allow any children near him, PLEASE!

It was an obvious joke post, mofo.

Do I like 'em to LOOK TOO YOUNG? Oh, hell yeah!!!

But---and THIS IS KEY---I don't want 'em to BE TOO YOUNG.

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

It was a joke, mofo.

Your sick mind isn't funny, Joe. It's no joke to be sexually excited by viewing images of underaged girls and boys! Turn yourself in, Joe. Seek help in dealing with your sickness and please stop trying to spread it around.

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Your sick mind isn't funny, Joe. It's no joke to be sexually excited by viewing images of underaged girls and boys! Turn yourself in, Joe. Seek help in dealing with your sickness and please stop trying to spread it around.

They're NOT underage, idiot.

[ELaken-Palmer]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

They're NOT underage, idiot.

They excite you sexually because they look underage. Therefore you are excited by the image of a child, Joe. Can't you see? You are a sick pedophile, Joe. Children are not safe with you around. You need to seek help for your sickness, Joe. Go! Find an officer and turn yourself in. They will do the right things to you, Joe. It will save a lot of innocent children. Think of them, Joe. NO, WAIT! STOP thinking of them, Joe!

[JoeDirty]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

They excite you sexually because they look underage. Therefore you are excited by the image of a child, Joe. Can't you see? You are a sick pedophile, Joe. Children are not safe with you around. You need to seek help for your sickness, Joe. Go! Find an officer and turn yourself in. They will do the right things to you, Joe. It will save a lot of innocent children. Think of them, Joe. NO, WAIT! STOP thinking of them, Joe!

They don't look underage. Not really.

[Wee Hector]

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

They're NOT underage, idiot.

You're the only joke round here Joe.

"Hey Joe, where you goin' with that gun in your hand?

Hey Joe , where you goin' with that gun in your hand?

I'm goin' down to shoot my young shemale

Ye know I caught him messin' round with a paedophile"

Hendrix certainly knew all about you when he followed this up with "Purple Haze".

[JoeDirty]

I respond to the Wee Man/EL-P/Etc. socks here....

http://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.php?t=292166

[ELaken-Palmer]

Joe just may do the right thing and turn himself in as long as we hold the mirror in front of him so that he can see how sick and perverted he is. There will be one less pedophile walking the streets once Joe is in jail or in a hospital.

[darthel0101]

Originally Posted by ELaken-Palmer

Joe just may do the right thing and turn himself in as long as we hold the mirror in front of him so that he can see how sick and perverted he is. There will be one less pedophile walking the streets once Joe is in jail or in a hospital.

Last I heard, the only way to confine mental disorders is to prove CONTINUING danger to either self or community. The prosecutor would need to show a history before he could show a continuation of that history.

[JoeDirty]

Posted from another thread in self-defense....

Originally Posted by JoeDirty

Where the fuck did I EVER say that someone might hurt a kid? NOWHERE.

I ALWAYS said that one can be a pedo and NEVER touch a child.

I argued logically that being an avid reader and jerking off to pedo sex stories meant that one got off on them and thus was sexually attracted to kids.
(How could one jerk off constantly to a particular theme and NOT have a fetish for it?)

You (the EL-P sock) are not only falsely accusing me of being a pedo but you're also saying that I'm a danger to kids...even my own nieces and nephews. This I NEVER said to anyone!

In addition, you're spamming threads with basically the same post over and over.

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED.

[ELaken-Palmer]

You see his sick mind at work here. Joe just may do the right thing and turn himself in as long as we hold the mirror in front of him so that he can see how sick and perverted he is. There will be one less pedophile walking the streets once Joe is in jail or in a hospital.