Scott Guy murder trial

[Geraldo]

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10816590

above is the latest report by the new zealand herald on the unfolding trial (that i believe is almost finished if i am not mistaken) on who killed scott guy, a fielding new zealand farmer, on the dark morning of july 8th, 2010.

yawn. when are these religious nutters going to realise they are only hurting themselves. do any other new zealanders here think this? that religion makes up most of this case? you can bet your bottom dollar that you won't hear about this in any way during the trial, whats left of it.

i don't believe scott guy was shot and killed over family fortune or some kind of affair... religion (probably catholicism) was the motivation. because of religion a man is dead and has left behind a grieving (although not genuinely) wife and a child who will never know their father. may i say that i think anna macdonald looks extremely cute but in my observation has displayed a cold emotionless appearance in the pictures. that also plays a part in why scott guy is dead.

the herald website was giving the story all the attention in the world last week with two or three updates a day, i think that was unnecessary.

[richief]

Well as your link concentrates mostly on the freaks heading for the public gallery, can you give reasons why you think religion is the catalyst for this crime.

[Geraldo]

Originally Posted by richief

Well as your link concentrates mostly on the freaks heading for the public gallery, can you give reasons why you think religion is the catalyst for this crime.

oh of course. i also think a time machine was involved and a government (i won't name which as i'm not sure) is implicated as well. but none of that will be brought up in whats remaining of the trial.

richief, we live in a changed world now since 9/11... its all about our reputations. nothing is more important than your reputation. we don't live normal lives anymore where we just wake up, work, have a bit of free time then sleep. everything we do, everything we say and everything we think is critical to what happens in this world. we are so important that anything can happen, anything. christianity plays its part.

i want a normal life. one without pain, fear, misery, psychosis, aggressiveness and drugs, but i will never get it... maybe when the war in afghanistan ends?

[m21]

[richief]

Originally Posted by Geraldo

oh of course. i also think a time machine was involved and a government (i won't name which as i'm not sure) is implicated as well. but none of that will be brought up in whats remaining of the trial.

richief, we live in a changed world now since 9/11... its all about our reputations. nothing is more important than your reputation. we don't live normal lives anymore where we just wake up, work, have a bit of free time then sleep. everything we do, everything we say and everything we think is critical to what happens in this world. we are so important that anything can happen, anything. christianity plays its part.

i want a normal life. one without pain, fear, misery, psychosis, aggressiveness and drugs, but i will never get it... maybe when the war in afghanistan ends?

So you are subscribing to a conspiracy but refuse to give any more information than the above.

You also imply that a government is involved, I will assume you mean the USA, but in you OP you say it is all about religion, which is it or did the US kill a farmer in NZ because of his religious views, which appear to run concurrent with their own views.

I guess I can put all this down to unfounded CT crap as you refuse to put any proof on the board.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by richief

So you are subscribing to a conspiracy but refuse to give any more information than the above.

You also imply that a government is involved, I will assume you mean the USA, but in you OP you say it is all about religion, which is it or did the US kill a farmer in NZ because of his religious views, which appear to run concurrent with their own views.

I guess I can put all this down to unfounded CT crap as you refuse to put any proof on the board.

As you would expect this trial is front page news here in New Zealand and I have followed it closely. Not closely enough to have heard anything about religious nutters though.

It looks to be a case of two men running a farm, one is favored more than the other and the other one murders him.

No need to check the grassy knoll for this one, MacDonald's as guilty as sin - his wife won't have a bar of him- and he will be convicted.

he is a truly evil bastard.And a devious little shit.

[Not That Guy]

I to have not heard mention a religious argument either plus i dont think he will be convicted on circumstantial evidence.
Theres no doubt hes a nutter but theres also not conclusive proof he did it either.

[Geraldo]

not guilty everyone.

goodnight.

[Not That Guy]

Like i said, Not enough evidence.

[teddies!!!]

And then the copas got desprate in my opinion they had nothing at the end of the day

[xxxxnnxx]

Lol why

[Geraldo]

so if ewen mcdonald didn't kill scott guy, the eery (spelling?) question is, who did? is this a case of mcdonald killing scott guy but not being sent to jail because he knew it couldn't be done as there was not enough evidence? did scott guy do something to deserve to die?

lol... who else here thinks that woman (i think she is ewen mcdonalds wife) is something, huh?

[Not That Guy]

Scott Guys may or may not be guilty but he had a better defense liar then the prosecutors lawyer.
New charges have been laid but cant be reported as yet.
And yes the woman involved in this and i mean both spouses are hawt.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by Not That Guy

Scott Guys may or may not be guilty but he had a better defense liar then the prosecutors lawyer.
New charges have been laid but cant be reported as yet.
And yes the woman involved in this and i mean both spouses are hawt.

How come the Monty Python Albatross sketch sound track plays on this thread?

Ewan MacDonald got away with murder. He shot Scott Guy at close range face on twice.He must have been covered in Scott's blood but I never heard anything about what he wore when he left home, what he wore when he turned up to "hear" of the murders instead we had some evidence about dive boots which weren't found and might have been a size 8 or 9 according to the "expert" witness and which the Defense lawyer suggested were a size 11.

So another piss poor effort after Bain walked free ,the murdering bastard, by the New Zealand Police.

They actually put up nothing to convict him just stuff to suggest that if there was a list of suspects he should be on the top of it.

But you should have seen him in court, that was the face of a guilty man.
Hope he rots in hell.

[Not That Guy]

Maybe a Dingo did it, or a chocolate labrador.

[Prurient Purveyer]

Originally Posted by Not That Guy

Maybe a Dingo did it, or a chocolate labrador.

Well his parents believe him.

Maybe they'd like to buy some Equity Corp shares too?

[scotsmitch2001]

Just another example of the New Zealand Police getting it wrong.
They assumed that a New Zealand jury would find an arsonist and graffitist guilty of murder.
They arrested the wrong person, ruining his and two families life's forever.
Just because the police charged him does not make him guilty.
Does not mean he did it and got off with it.
There is no proof whatsoever that Ewen McDonald had anything to do with the killing of Scott Guy.

[Geraldo]

oh for fucks sake is there a way to stop that movie from playing every time i enter this thread?

so does some unknown just come along in the dark early morning and shoot a man he doesn't know for no reason? lol?

i thought it was a bit silly for the prosecution to imply that macdonald was guilty because he said at the crime scene guy had been shot. if he didn't kill him, and that he has been found as being not guilty since a week or so ago, then it was what he thought. of course he didn't know that he had been shot for sure, he was just guessing. something said like that should have been taken with a grain of salt.

i think he did do it. the vandalism, then the shooting. but there is something else that tells me that yes, it could have been someone else. i don't think i am the right guy to make a concrete judgement, i wouldn't have wanted to be on the jury. what if someone known to macdonald shot and killed guy for him? should the case remain open?

guess what the latest news is to come out of this? anna macdonald, it has been revealed, is in a new relationship. by god she is cute isn't she?

what i would like to know is whether the macdonalds are catholic? if yes, then my suspicions about macdonald having killed guy would rise.

[michael saint]

Originally Posted by Geraldo

oh for fucks sake is there a way to stop that movie from playing every time i enter this thread?

No there isn't. I asked m21 not to use autoplay but the ignorant cunt still does it.

He thinks that he is clever.

Put the stupid prick on ignore.