That is just plain sexist, or is it? thanks I never knew.

 

Osakisbl, the flowers buds are what develops and holds the most thc potency. This is what you buy when buying weed. The buds are broken up, ground down and smoked in a joint or a bowl in a pipe. Leaves are usually low in thc but they can take all the left over leaves and extract the thc from them which renders hash, hash oil, canna butter etc.

 

So basically you grow a bunch of great big plants throw half of them away and only use some of the rest. Sounds expensive.

 

Ah, modern science, I should have known.

 

I think this thread is a ploy by @Rixer to get us to send him all our weed for sanctuary...

 

I was going to quote this and show you how stupid and ignorant (two different things) you are again. But once I read the rest of the thread I don't have to because so many others already proved that.

Don't you ever get tired of being stupid and ignorant (two different things)?

As many others have already proven I was not lying.

Bullshit. You won't do any of that. Proven by the fact you just had your chance.]

 

Society has already kicked your worthless pussy lying ass. Posting lies is ALL that you do on this forum...

LOL, why don't you do society a favor and go flush your shit for brains ass down the toilet.

 

The females produce more and more resin trying to get pollinated. Those are the buds that get you high. Smoke them in a water pipe.
Attached are the sugar leaves. You decarb them, and make Rick Simpson oil, and vape to cure all ills, up to including cancer. Great
sleeping oils...g'nite all.

 

Still waiting...

 

Waiting for what?

Has the Trump administration started locking pot smokers up?

You have probably spent a good part of your life "waiting".

Do you think all that waiting will ever pay off?

 

The incompatibilities between federal and local laws in this case are untenable.

Even Sessions doesn't want to lead a crusade against recreational users, but enforcement is a slippery slope because banks, employers, insurers and the medical community have regulatory and self-policing burdens that are predicated on the illegality of marjijuana at the federal level.

In the many areas in which state and federal law collide, institutions must adhere to federal law, and therefore federal law must be enforced.

Federal and state law should not be in conflict this way. States have the ability to make law and regulation within the scope of what federal statutes allow. The local "grass roots" support for recreational drug legality is ill-advised, and it can't work long-term.

 

I dont have anything against States Rights or laws, or whatever a State wants to do, as long as the States citizens have a proper vote on it.

Now, if the State regulations and legislation is in violation of federal fucking government regulations and legislation, in this particular instance, I could care less...all the way up to the point to where interstate commerce is involved, that is exactly the time when the Federal fucking government should get involved, and hammer the fuck out of that State.

 

The conflicts are too many, and too severe.

These guys are always sharing their Mother Jones crap about how safe it is, but it just isn't true.

Just one example: Marijuana users have no business around machinery. So railroads, including Amtrak and most metro transit authorities, are implementing mandatory random testing with summary termination for users of marijuana. Users are suing for harassment and wrongful termination, because the tests detect the presence of THC for weeks (i.e., use at home, and not just "on the job.")

But how are the federal government and the courts supposed to deal with those complaints? Unlike ethyl alcohol, which works through one's system in four to six hours, THC does in fact linger for weeks and alter neural function. Not only that, but the effect is cumulative if one uses marijuana daily. So, for public safety and to indemnify employers, federal regulation and enforcement MUST reflect those inconvenient truths.

There are so many such examples. The practical conflicts are endless.

 

So it all about state's rights unless it's about marijuana. lol hypocrisy in action.

At any rate, the war on marijuana is a lost cause and to ramp it up is to throw even more tax dollars down the tubes on a wasted effort. The people have voted and over 68 million people now live in states with legalized recreational marijuana. The genie is out of the bottle and it ain't going back. Deal with it.

These pesky prohibitionists might be a pain in the ass for legal, regulated, tax paying cannabis growers and sellers, but the consumer will still have weed available. Where there is a demand, it will be satisfied. It's far better to legalize and regulate than to support the black market.

Oh and our lawmakers are already lining up for a fight. AG's from legal states will work together to fight this. How much effort, money and time do you want to waste just to fail?

Oh yeah, and after all the reefer madness, it turns out marijuana is a miracle plant! Is that ironic or what?

 

Horsefeathers, marijuana is the safest theraeutic substance known to man. And traces of thc may show up in your system long after the effects are worn off. The high only last an hour or two so you aren't helping your cause by repeating the fake news you claim to hate so much... know what I mean?

 

Breathe.

You guys are right that Spicer announced stepped up enforcement.

But CS NatureBoy is also right that Spicer did NOT announce a crusade against users.

The problem, as I said, is that the federal government and courts are going to have to defer to federal law when individual users come into conflict with employers and institutions (banks, insurers, hospitals). State AG's can grandstand all they want on protecting their voters' right to medicate themselves, but that's all for show, because that isn't where the conflicts are going to occur.

Another example: dispensaries for the most part still can't open business checking accounts. Nor can they legally operate credit card processing (card-POS) terminals. This makes them cash businesses and crime risks.

68 million voters can't change that. It is not going away. Deal with it.

 

I didn't say the high lingers and accumulates. I said the effect on neural function lingers and accumulates.

The dopamine effect is brief. (This is the high.) This is true of any drug. And any form of pleasure, for that matter, including the brevity of orgasm.

But THC has a lingering effect on cortical processes, and that effect accumulates, with regular use. This is why sober people can identify burnouts on sight. It is also why employers have the right to summarily terminate users of the substance.

 

Well, not really. Remember the states that tried to ban same sex marriage? The Supreme Court explained that Federal law trumps (pun intended) state law where there are conflicts. Even where a majority of a states voters pass an initiative banning same sex marriage, Federal Law will still rule.

 

68 million people are dealing with it. Look how far we've come! lol It's working quite well thank you. As far as banking, yes that's a problem. You would think the government would allow the banks to deal with businesses in the industry simply for tax collection benefits if nothing else. No problem for the consumer though and btw way, dispensaries have atm's inside so people can just get cash on the spot.

At any rate, dispensaries have very good security because of this. I feel safer at the dispensary than I do walking into a 7-11.

 

Winning the right to smoke weed will in no way impinge on the right of employers to drug test.