1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    More of the '80's shit to pull out of the attack for an attack.

    Didn't Obama publicly claim that we can keep our doctor.... and also say publicly health insurance policies under the ACA would cut costs by $2500.00?

    Did Hillary actually swindle 20% of the plutonium out of America so RUSSIA could buy it?

    Was Bill Ayers actually just a guy that lived in the neighborhood?.. you know, the guy that founded the American militant radical left-wing organization that bomb several locations in the U.S.?

    What a deadly frightening scary list of shit that is.
     
  2. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,170
    Trump owes $300 million to bank involved in global money laundering scheme led by Russian criminals

     
  3. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Sure, but President Dipshit is now in office. All your other bullshit is no longer valid.

    That would be like continually blaming your mom for your mental retardation because of all the cocaine she did while pregnant with you. Just accept who you are and move the fuck along.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    But, I dont know who my mom was. Ask your mom if she's my mom.
     
  5. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Probably because your mom was raped and murdered by an illegal immigrant. Just the way I am sure you picture it or hoped it happened.
     
  6. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    So what.

    More non-news.
     
    1. anon_de_plume
      Wow, don't care that the president is indebted to a foreign entity.
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 31, 2017
    2. ace's n 8's
      So what, the politicians have indebted the entire U.S. population to a foreign entity.............

      Do you want to talk about that?, it certainly seems to have more credible substance to it.
       
      ace's n 8's, Mar 31, 2017
    3. anon_de_plume
      If you insist...

      Which president has done anything close?
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 31, 2017
    4. ace's n 8's
      It's a non-issue sugar plum...

      Trump was a business man..looking for money to grow his business, it's just that simple.
       
      ace's n 8's, Mar 31, 2017
    5. anon_de_plume
      Trump is the president. He took an oath to protect and defend the constitution. Not to do private business while we pay his tab.

      That you defend him is sad. Just shows how much you really love this country. Yes, I'm calling you out as a traitor!
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 31, 2017
  7. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Not likely.
     
  8. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,170
    Sean Spicer is being crucified again for his response in the press briefing today when he was asked if Trump was going to admit his stupid lie and apologize to President Obama.

    "We'll see what the week brings," was his phony dodge this time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    59,191
    Spicer has a bad job. I will enjoy reading his exposé after he finally can't stand it any more, and quits the Trump administration. :p
     
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,170
    Trump and Spicer now can't back up fast enough.

    Sean Spicer retreats on Manafort: ‘Inappropriate to comment on a person who is not a White House employee’
     
  11. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,246
    So here's the thing.
    The uber left, still butt hurt over their man (woman) loosing the election to a pompous gas bag, have been racing about vomiting all sorts of twisted Trump attack articles. No matter that they are inaccurate or downright lies from their steamy titles to their biased conclusions. The point is to villainize all things Trump. The goal is to so wrap up the Trump administration in controversy that it is paralyzed and incapable of achieving anything.
    A tried and true strategy.

    However.

    It comes with high risk. To date, Trump has "outtweeted" the uber left, lobbing shiny baubles left and right that the uber left KNOWS are little more than planned distractions, but they simply cannot help racing to each and glaring at it for any hint of ............ well, of anything.

    If Trump succeeds in accomplishing very much at all in the next two years, the uber left will be exposed for the worthless unpatriotic flakes that they are. They will be discredited. Their outrageous stories, posted all about the web (including here) will be dragged from the archives by ecstatic Trump supporters and ravaged with scorn. Those who posted them and touted them and demonized any who disagreed will be exposed as the mindless puppets of a failed political movement spawned in the drug filled vapors of a Berkley dorm room and used by a billionaire terrorist to further his spew of hate and fear.

    And the Trump followers, those Beer drinking, gun toting, truck driving, genetically ambiguous Red Neck Americans will be emboldened to take matters to the next level. They will demand a national red neck holiday right next to Intersex day of remembrance (Ironically, held on November 8 to honor the birthday of Herculine Barbin).

    The uber left is playing a dangerous and high risk game of cat an mouse with the master of tactics and strategy. They are "all in" as it were, risking complete political destruction and national scorn if they loose, and in the bargain the forgotten middle Americans will sweep into national prominence, gleefully pulling the wings off of the snowflakes and bitchy crybabies of a failed political fringe movement.

    And the best the uber left can hope for is the impeachment of a pompous gas bag that might otherwise destroy himself in a flurry of tweets. The result of his impeachment however would be the enthroning of an even more conservative but more bullet resistant Trump worshipper from Indiana who would, with much more sophistication, carry forward the Trump agenda without further delay.

    For in the end, the butt hurt uber left, in their rage and rush to destroy he who snatched victory from their grasp, forgot that no matter what, Hillary Clinton cannot ever be enthroned in the oval office. Their messiah, who they still pine for, has departed.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,170
    Just ROFLCOPTERS!!!!! that the Trump supporters can't admit that all the Twitter In Chief is doing is exposing his mental instability, his constant delusions, and fucking up everything the conservative/Republican/Tea Party/White Supremacists in congress are trying to do.

    They still don't get it. What worked for Trump on TV and during the campaign just won't cut it now because apparently they missed it but Trump really did get elected president and now he has to govern. And he can't because he is a mentally ill lying phony who has surrounded himself with people dumber than he is..
     
    1. shootersa
      Your opinions and your posts carry no credibility here.
      No one cares much about your rants.
       
      shootersa, Mar 22, 2017
    2. anon_de_plume
      If YOU don't care so much, why do you repeatedly post how much people don't care? If you didn't care, you wouldn't be reading any part of his posts...
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 31, 2017
    3. shootersa
      Well, here's the thing with unsupporters. They all but pee every time the Trump name surfaces. Shooter is just trying to remind them that

      IT ISN'T ALL ABOUT THEM

      Or about you for that matter.
       
      shootersa, Mar 31, 2017
    4. anon_de_plume
      / :rolleyes: \
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 31, 2017
  13. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    So Representative Nunes was standing in front of the White House discussing communications from Trump and associates talking with foreign governments (not Russia) that was picked up by intelligence agencies during the transition.

    Nunes stated an unnamed person brought these documents to his attention. Waiting on response from NSA, CIA, FBI, etc.

    A few problems here.

    Nunes stated the investigation is ongoing and all the information has not been gathered, but he can go in front of the national media and make insinuations.

    Nunes stated this was normal, legal collection through active FISA warrant. So, what is the issue?

    Nunes stated the names were unmasked. The only name that I know was unmasked was Flynn.

    President Dipshit said he was vindicated. Ugh no. You said wiretapped, not incidental collection of conversations with foreign governments.

    One would have to realize all foreign governments are under US surveillance. There was always a chance the conversations Trump and associates made to foreign governments was being recorded.
     
    1. xxxaddict76
      All the leaks appear to be about contact with Russian officials. This new discovery was about contact with foreign governments other than Russia. This new information was never leaked. So, if the intelligence agencies discarded the incidental collection, but someone printed off the collection and handed off to Nunes; wouldn't Nunes be one of those leakers or aiding one of those leakers?
       
      xxxaddict76, Mar 22, 2017
  14. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,170
    Ok now I will admit I didn't know how the Democrats were going be able to force the conservative/Republican/Tea Party/White Supremacist members of congress to name a special prosecutor and select committee to get to the bottom of Trump's Russian connections. But thankfully Rep Nunes just did it for them.

    Nunes just pulled the dumbest and most counter productive stunt I think team Trump has pulled yet. And that is really saying something.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Man Tasked With Investigating Trump’s Ties To Russia Makes Friendly Visit To White House

    Rep. Devin Nunes’ bombshell disclosures about surveillance on Trump associates raise more questions than they answer.

    WASHINGTON ― Investigators don’t normally brief the people they’re investigating. But on Wednesday afternoon, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the Republican who’s leading a congressional investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s team colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election, went to the White House to talk to the president.

    Nunes, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a close Trump ally, said the intercepted communications didn’t mention Russia and were therefore unrelated to his investigation. But the subject matter ― the intelligence community’s investigation of Trump and his associates’ connections to foreign powers ― overlapped. And Nunes’ objective appeared political: Deflect attention from Trump and his associates’ ties to Russia, and back up Trump’s claim that he is a victim of “deep state” loyal to former President Barack Obama.

    Nunes’ gambit failed. In attempting to put out the Trump-Russia fire, he made much of it worse: In two press conferences on Wednesday, he confirmed that Trump’s surrogates ― and maybe the president himself ― were subjects of legal surveillance, implied that they may have had suspicious contact with agents from a country other than Russia, and potentially disclosed classified information.

    “If a Democrat had done this, Republicans would have been asking for him to be investigated both for disclosing classified information and for obstructing justice,” said Matthew Miller, a Department of Justice spokesman during the Obama administration. “It is so far beyond the pale for the person who is conducting an investigation to both brief the subject of that investigation and potentially jeopardize an ongoing criminal investigation being conducted by the FBI.”

    http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_58d2e0b5e4b02d33b748452d?
     
  16. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Schiff: I have 'grave concerns' over Nunes's surveillance claim

    Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) criticized Nunes for his surprise announcement earlier in the day that he had seen intelligence intercepts that showed authorities had incidentally gathered information on members of the Trump transition team during investigations that the chairman said were not related to Russia.

    Schiff maintained that if Trump and his aides ended up in a lawfully compiled intelligence report, they were likely not the subjects of surveillance.

    "As to the substance of what the Chairman has alleged, if the information was lawfully gathered intelligence on foreign officials, that would mean that U.S. persons would not have been the subject of surveillance," he said.

    "In my conversation late this afternoon, the Chairman informed me that most of the names in the intercepted communications were in fact masked, but that he could still figure out the probable identity of the parties," he added.

    Schiff also said that it is "impossible" to evaluate the accuracy of Nunes's claim while reiterating that the committee does not support the president's wiretapping allegation.

    http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...grave-concerns-over-nunes-surveillance-claims
     
  17. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    Well, I guess we as a nation can chalk this administration up as being ''TRANSPARENT''...

    Unlike the transparency of the previous Government, and Administration.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Now that is funny. President Dipshit transparent. Lol.
     
  19. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Nunes fucked up.

    The latest Trump wiretapping news, explained in plain English

    What Nunes said

    There were a few key phrases Nunes’ said in his statement and subsequent Q&A that helped clarify what, exactly, he claims to have discovered.

    The first is “incidentally collected.” In intelligence jargon, that means the Trump officials were not the target of surveillance — that what they said was “incidentally” picked up by surveillance intentionally targeting someone else.

    The second is “legally collected foreign intelligence.” What Nunes meant here is that the communications were between Trump and a foreign national, under surveillance authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). FISA allows secret courts to issue surveillance warrants for non-Americans.

    Third, Nunes flatly denied any link between what he saw and the Russian intelligence probe: “None of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities.”

    So put this all together, and what Nunes actually found becomes at least somewhat clear. The US intelligence community, during legally authorized surveillance of foreign nationals, picked up communications between members of Trump’s campaign and some unspecified, but definitely not Russian, individuals.

    US spies, per Nunes, hadn’t intentionally targeted the Trump team, but instead acquired some information about them over the course of normal activities.

    What’s strange, according to intelligence experts, is that there’s nothing scandalous in that. The US intelligence community routinely monitors communications between US officials and foreign dignitaries; there’s no reason to believe the Trump transition team would be exempt from that.

    “That’s what the intel community specializes in — spying on foreigners!” Nada Bakos, a former CIA analyst and current senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, tells me. “Does the White House not presume that foreign nationals are being monitored by US intelligence when talking to US officials?”

    What’s left unclear

    If what Nunes did say didn’t tell us a lot, what he didn’t say opens up a whole series of tantalizing questions. There are at least seven open questions:

    Given the lack of crucial information, and Nunes’ failure to speak first with the FBI director, Bakos found the entire decision to go public somewhat confusing.

    “This is cherry-picking information and then releasing it publicly,” she said. “This is not how an investigation should be done.”

    Trump and his allies allies are falsely claiming it supports their wiretapping claim.

    One thing that is very clear, however, is that nothing Nunes said vindicates Trump’s claim that Obama wiretapped Trump Tower. Nunes said, explicitly, that “there was not a physical wiretap of Trump Tower. The fact that the collection was “incidental” means that there wasn’t any order to surveil Trump or his associates directly revealed by Nunes’ evidence. And Trump claimed that Obama spied on him during the campaign, while what Nunes’ is describing happened after the election.

    “This does not back up Trump’s claim at all,” Bakos says.

    Yet Trump, and some of his allies, seem to have taken it that way. Sean Hannity tweeted that it “confirms SURVEILLANCE VS @POTUS.” A pro-Trump SuperPAC is already fundraising off the revelations:

    — The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) March 22, 2017

    This is leading some more observers to allege that Nunes’ plan all along: Release information in an intentionally confusing fashion that allows Trump to more plausibly claim that he was being surveilled intentionally even though it shows nothing of the kind.

    — Evan McMullin (@Evan_McMullin) March 22, 2017


    — Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) March 22, 2017

    This is hard to prove, of course. But it’s clear that these observers are right to be worried about the misuse of Nunes’ revelations — and to wonder if there was some way that Nunes could have raised his concerns without also confusing the public.

    The latest Trump wiretapping news, explained in plain English https://a.msn.com/r/2/BByBAs2?m=en-us&ocid=News
     
    1. shootersa
      So, then, is this the proof that supports the Secret CIA assessment that says Russia intervened in the election to help Trump win?

      And if so, isn't Trump vindicated because the only way the CIA could come up with that assessment is through tapping into conversations being held by Russians plotting to install Trump in the whitehouse?

      Your blovating posts just keep getting more and more unusual.
      Do you still buy into the idea that the Government flew planes into the Twin towers on 9/11?
       
      shootersa, Mar 31, 2017
    2. xxxaddict76
      Took you 9 days to reply. You are always a day late and a dollar short.
       
      xxxaddict76, Apr 1, 2017
  20. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    It is being reported Nunes is NOT in possession of the alleged transcripts. This means (if the transcripts exist) the transcripts are located at the FBI, CIA, or NSA. These are classified transcripts. Which means Nunes leaked classified information to the press.

    The other side of that is someone in one of those intelligence agencies leaked the transcripts to Nunes. Nunes then leaked classified information to the press.

    Wasn't Nunes the one whining about leaks.

    Nunes. Leaking classified information is a felony.