1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. Hush

    Hush Happy Hhedonist

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    16,030
    Now I get it... As folks typically rise up through the ranks of politics, they affiliate themselves with this party or that, yet what if things were a tad different? Different as in, when a person runs for the President of The United States, then all affiliations with any party are supposedly severed. Now I'm not naïve and realize that there would still likely be communication between the candidate and their previous party, however, in doing so that likely means that the other parties might begin soliciting them as well, and naturally they are under no obligation to their original party lines.

    Add to that, no funds from a party may be transferred or utilized in the presidential election, nor may that party campaign for any candidate. Now I get how there are all these bogus organizations that spring up already to campaign for individuals, and many are funded by respective parties, yet, without the ability to have an open or even slightly hidden paper trail, that means that it would become even more difficult, and the power such groups might have once had is diminished.

    So what's the point?

    Folks have never liked when the president, the senate and house together lean heavy one way or the other. Oh sure, they like it when their choices are in such a position, yet raise holy hell when they're not. So the goal here would be simply putting just that much more, no matter how fractional it may be of a gap between congress and the president, and naturally partisanship.

    The President is supposed to represent "everyone." As the system stands, he does not. We have congress to represent the states and the people within them based upon that state's leanings. That's fine in that there is some point where there has to be a collective melting pot of opinion made. However, "I'd like" to be able to view the president as that great moderator and organizer. Not a fraction of the nations citizen's powerhouse wherein we go X-years this way, then Y-years that way, and in the end we become a government simply chasing its tail, wasting OUR money as they enact then eliminate this and that.

    Thoughts, arguments? Though I realize it won't happen, try and urge yourself from using the current situation either for or against to support your opinions. Simply right vs. wrong and why would be nice for a change.

    Yeah, this thread is dead before it started :meh:

    Hush....an alias
     
    #1
  2. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    well in theory --- never-mind...
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #2
  3. freethinker

    freethinker Pervy Bear

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    31,322
    It sounds like a good idea, but unfortunately, I don't think it will ever happen. People are so enamored of the two-party system in the US, they can't think in terms of anything else. It's always left vs right, liberal vs conservative - Democrat vs Republican. Sure, there are other political parties out there, but the two-party system is so entrenched in American politics, barely anyone pays any attention to them. They're afraid voting for a third party candidate is a wasted vote, and the sad fact is, as things stand now, they're right. Rather than vote for someone who might really be able to make a difference without making a complete circus of it, they'd rather vote for a buffoon because he's 'their' party's candidate.
     
    #3
  4. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,998
    Shooter thinks it is much better for a candidate to be affiliated with a political party. They will be anyway, why let this be a potential issue (Biden secretly locked into Democrats through his dog's e Mail, the scoundrel). Better the devil you know and so forth.
    The problem as Shooter sees it is the that "party politics" is getting nastier and will not get better for years. The Republicans are smugly in control, but if the winds blow in Washington as they normally do, the Democrats will claim (arrogantly) control of one or both houses in a couple of years and the hatespeak will only get worse. Above all we need to find common ground between the Democrats and Republicans, put down the pitchforks for a bit and have some meaningful dialogue. The problem is, the Republicans right now don't need to and the "new Democrats" don't want to talk; they want Trumps blood, they want Clinton in the oval office and fuck anyone or anything that stands in their way or dares to disagree. They are even threatening old line Democrats with primary fights for their seats if they don't get in line damn quick.
    It is this trend in politics that is most concerning; the sides aren't talking with each other and the new Democrats aren't talking to anyone; they just want blood.

    A better course might be Federally funded elections, but capping funds and then keeping the big money out will be a challenge what with free speech and all.

    Maybe just locking up George Soros would be enough to restore some sanity in our politics.

    Nah. Somebody'd bitch.

    The revolution is perhaps the only way; vote the robbers out, get some new blood in Congress and see what shakes out.

    Are you ready to join the revolution, Hush?
     
    #4
  5. pussy in boots

    pussy in boots ride em cowgirl up

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    57,039
    Never happen!
    Politicians are big liars. You would never know who alined with your political tenets.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #5
  6. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,615
    The two party system evolved as a result of our Constitutional form of government. Our Executive and Legislature are separate, and each are elected for fixed terms. This forces a certain stability, because everyone is stuck with everyone else, for the time being. In order to get anything done, ideas and plans have to be supported by enough elected officials to make sense of things. Like minded legislators get together to come up with a consensus plan and present it to the entire body. Parties are going to form because it's the most efficient way to operate a legislature.

    Since the President must have a majority of the vote, political factions will always form alliances until at least one can receive 50%+1 votes. There is no practical way to eliminate parties from politics because politics is why we have parties.
     
    #6
  7. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,170
    I think it was be far more effective to eliminate money from our system and make all elections publicly funded. It would break the cycle of constant begging (campaigning) for money, and it would get rid of the pay-to-play aspect of governing.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. shootersa
      How would you deal with free speech issues and private campaigns for candidates?
       
      shootersa, Mar 24, 2017
    2. anon_de_plume
      If no one is allowed to donate, then no one has any rights over anyone else. Besides, money is not free speech. Money actually amplifies your voice, this drowning out the poor who can't afford to "donate" (or buy off) to a politician.
       
      anon_de_plume, Mar 24, 2017
    #7
  8. Hellcat41979

    Hellcat41979 J.A.F.A.

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2013
    Messages:
    4,781
    You also need to put any pay raises in the hands of the voters and get rid of all of the other rules and laws that protect Washington politicians from the same penalties as the average US citizen. But since the same Washington politicians would have to pass such a law it isn't likely to happen anytime soon.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    #8
  9. Rixer

    Rixer Horndog

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    28,938
    One thing WE can do it way is quit voting party line. Vote your conscience.
     
    1. shootersa
      Or, know your candidates net worth when they got into office and what it is today, ask questions and take the answers into account when you vote.

      Are you joining the revolution?
       
      shootersa, Mar 24, 2017
    #9
  10. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    been doing that for years...

    if thy have a Hispanic sounding name no vote from me....
     
    #10
  11. steve_vme

    steve_vme The truth seeker

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,132

    The party system is un-constitutional, separation of church and state. God means infinite knowledge and wisdom, God is Earth and Earth is God, the Declaration of Independence. For thousands of years all mankind has done is to lie and deceive.
     
    1. Mayling
      Where the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts. Not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who would pervert the Constitution.
       
      Mayling, Mar 25, 2017
    2. Mayling
      Naturally I'm plagiarizing Abraham Lincoln.
       
      Mayling, Mar 25, 2017
    #11
  12. clarise

    clarise Precious princess Banned!

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    17,788
    Virtually all people vote for their own self interest.

    They get into politics for the same reason. Almost all of them.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #12
  13. seafoam1

    seafoam1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2012
    Messages:
    8,075
    All politicians are crooked, every single one of them. Even when they start out with the best of intentions the money and the power and the system corrupt them. They are all out to enrich their own pockets and stay in office no matter what it takes. We are all the huddled masses and they are here to Lord over us.
    Term limits are the only answer to force them out of power. The people can't be counted on to vote out incumbents because they system is skewed to keep them in office.
     
    1. shootersa
      The answer is to know the net worth of your elected official when they enter office.
      And their net worth when they run for reelection.
      If they have done better than the average you should ask some pointed questions about that.
      Chances are, they've been taking care of their business and not your business.
      Vote accordingly.
      Welcome to the revolution.
       
      shootersa, Mar 25, 2017
    #13