Do I know what rhetorical means?

 

Yes women can be too.

 

To the point that concerns me....
GET your facts right, YOU have screamed for ALL stories labelled TRUE to be taken down and the authors banned, regardless of content.....

You have been advocating that pedophilia, in a story labelled true, is wrong...Now you say it is fine as long as it is NOT in a true story..You are a hypocrite of the first degree;;Pedophilia is wrong regardless of it being in a true or fiction story. But it is NOT wrong on this site to write about it, and even to label the story as true....


You basically call all authors of under-age sex stories pedos, regardless whether they have wrote a true or fiction story...

You are a waste of space and stealing other peoples valueable breathing air

I only made a few posts to your quote because I ran out of time on the edit post feature...
Considering YOU CANNOT let the topic of under-age sex die, there is a saying that we english people have that would be perfect for your last comment towards me..It is "talk about the pot calling the kettle black.."

In other words you are telling people that they are wrong for doing the same thing that you are doing...

 

Might be a good idea if you could lock the thread, so that NO more comments can be posted...That should stop all this tit-for-tat war and play on words argument....:excited::excited::lol::lol:

 

I quite like rapping. I do not like murder. Nor do I approve of it.

I happen to believe that, since we replaced blood feuds with the rule of the state in the 10th century, it has been the state's job to decide on penalties for crimes. I am content with that arrangement.

I'm less exercised by punishment than I am by deterrence and rehabilitation. If they work punishment becomes less necessary.

I'm intrigued by the fact that your debating style consists of asking non sequiturs each time you're challenged. It's a classic avoidance tactic. If I cared whether you're real or a really tedious troll I might ask myself if you have hidden guilts you can't address; but I'm becoming more and more convinced that you really are as shallow as you appear.

 

I understand this, but because you did not use all the post but took out the bits you dis-agreed with, it gave the resulting quote a false context...

Also it gave the impression that the quoted post was saying something different than what was originally intended...

This is why you should NEVER alter, change, edit or modify someone elses post when you are quoting it...If you CANNOT accept the post as it is, then you SHOULD NOT use it as a quote...

 

If one looked back at the posts, and those go back a lot further than this thread, I had tried to keep a civil tone initially, but after being called a pedophile repeatedly I gave up on that, and ripped into them, then that got boring really fast, as it often does, so I just left it alone for a while.

I find it more than a little amusing that they were all about the vitriol, even going so far as to hijack my picture, when it was just them ganging up on me, but now that the tide has turned, as it will do, they come over all starry eyed, "Can't we all just get along."
I will let just about anyone insult me five times, and after that I'm done playing nice.
Did they think that nobody had noticed the ridiculously harsh shit they were posting?

The thing that really pisses me off is the number of PMs I've gotten from people who are now afraid to post in the forums because they don't want to be a target, and it wouldn't be surprising to me if a lot of people took down their face pics behind that bullshit.
If they had real pictures of themselves on their profiles I'll bet they wouldn't be so quick to pull some shit like that.
They are going to have to do a lot better than that to convince me that they have learned anything at all out of all this.

 

Comment number 19

Comment number 20

Comment number 24

Comment number 312

Suggest you go back and read the posts in number order, as it was 33Black who turned this thread into a writer/pedo debate..
After someone had tried very hard NOT to bring this argument into the thread 33Black did a very good job of doing just what you are complaining about....
There was NO NEED for this thread to be posted as a MOD had already stated, in another thread, that if you post that you have had sex with an under-age person then you will be banned...

What is the difference between you NOT agreeing with the name calling, but accepting it as part of the freedom that this site allows, and you NOT agreeing with the under-age sex stories and then doing your utmost to get some of them banned...
Surely even you can see that all the author is doing is using the freedom that this site allows him/her..Just because you DO NOT like or agree with them, does not mean that they should be banned ...

The problem you are facing is that on this site, you DO NOT have to use tags or warnings when posting a sex story. So how are you going to know that first of all it is a true story and then an under-age sex story without first reading it.
So instead of spouting off that you want all true stories banned, because you do not know it is a true story until you read it, why not just ask if this side could adopt a tag system for all sex stories. Just a true or fiction tag would be enough....
Also as you have to be a member of xnxx to post a story on either site, why not express your disgust directly to the author concerned by means of a PM, instead of filling the forum with threads about a subject that has been debated to death...
On the sex story side of xnxx you HAVE to use tags, but they have a separate admin. Also they have a statement posted on the front page...
Copied and pasted, YET AGAIN....

We are against any censorship. Some texts can hurt sensibilities, but we feel the need to have them for various reasons we will not explain here and now. In fact, 'on the edge' themes are much more popular than others, as you can see by the 'views' and 'rating' numbers, they are real and have never been edited.

It is strange that you name me as 1 of the people turning this into a writer/pedo debate after accusing me of not being able to debate, and not having a mind of my own...
Considering that you need opposing view-points to have a debate, I feel that you maybe owe me an apology, but no worries.

In the section where you named me is where your problem lies, maybe just a quick re-think on what you have said will show you how hypocritical you are coming across as.
Any member of xnxx can post a story on either the sex story site or here..As both sides are owned by the same people, but have separate admin staff, then you have to have a set of guide-lines that is consistent..
The NO censorship guide-line works for both sides, if you try to change it for this side, then it will change for the sex story side aswell...
To put it simply, if you post a story on the sex story side, and you added pictures to your story. You will be under the same posting rules as this side...

Now try and say that I re-gurgitate your words or that I cannot debate.....

 

im curious if your so against what this guy is into what were you doing reading the threads he's posting in

 

great job we dont want peds around here!!!

 

i wonder how many of these chris-hansen-wannabes like to read horror stories and are psychotic serial killers just waiting for that first victim.

all you sick weirdos who read dean koontz and steven king should be thrown in jail!

 

Yeah, and if they watch Dexter, psh, forget about it!
:lol:

 

People diagnosed (or living with an undiagnosed case of) pedophilia do not choose whether they suffer the symptoms. The symptoms are displaying a clear sexual preference for pre-pubescent children.

The fact that they suffer from it does not mean they do not choose whether or not to ACT upon it. You seem to be equating pedophilia with breaking a law, which is not the case, pedophilia has nothing to do with committing a crime.

Sharing child porn, abusing children yourself, those are examples of people taking action as a result of pedophilia. That is where morality comes into play, and guilt is determined.

If it is not a disease, why does it fall under the International Classification of Diseases? I think you're taking it way too literally, or you're just on some intellectual ego-trip, in which case, get over yourself.

 

so no one talking about the new story rules?

 

I have already received a PM that was sarcastic and gloating...Though I might have put a spanner in the works by saying that, it is ONLY the stories that are being taken away. I guess you can still post thoughts in the sexuality section, or anywhere else....

 

So far we don't know exactly what the 'rule' is. They are going to have to post some very SPECIFIC guidelines, go through thousands of stories, someone is going to have to actually read and moderate new submissions, the whole front page is going to have to be overhauled, the specific 'rules' for story submissions will have to be posted...

Can you say migraine?

 

Just going to be interesting what they go after next?

 

What-ever they go after, I will still state my stance of defending ANY members right to freedom of expression using the written word...

 

or maybe, just maybe

they will be joyful at their strike against Freedom of Expression and sated in the joy of their victory, they will sit back at a job well done and just do nothing....

 

But as ejls has said, it has been a business decision taken due to global pressures. Their joy is about mis-placed as a candle in a nunnery...:excited::excited::lol::lol: