@Anon is correct, the security clearance is with the office, not the man. Ex-presidents do not retain security clearances.
I read this elsewhere and, unfortunately, accepted it as correct.
I apologize for the mistake.

 

Federal court rules DOJ must release internal memo to then-AG Barr stating Trump didn't obstruct justice
The Justice Department memo urged then-Attorney General Bill Barr to conclude that Trump had not obstructed justice

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals ruled on Friday that the Department of Justice must release an internal memo advising then-Attorney General Bill Barr in March 2019 to determine that former President Trump did not obstruct justice.

According to the appeals court, the memo urged then-Attorney General Bill Barr after the Mueller report was delivered "to conclude that President Trump had not obstructed justice."

The letter was sent to Barr from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel and another department official after Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered his report which investigated then-President Trump's potential election interference and obstruction of justice.

Barr sent an overview of the Muller report to congress on March 24, 2019, stating that the report didn't reach a conclusion on if then-President Trump obstructed justice, and said that there was insufficient evidence to make such a determination on his own.

Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan made the ruling in response to an ongoing lawsuit from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington against the Justice Department, which sought the release of the memorandum and all related records.



The Justice Department claimed that it could withhold the documents because they documented the agency's internal discussions about governmental decisions, which can be used as a reason to keep documents from the public's view.

The appeals court rejected the Justice Department's reason for withholding documents and ordered the agency to release the memorandum in full.

 

Unfortunately, much of what you said depended on them retaining their clearance.

 

Is that the golf course where he buried his first wife to get a tax break?

 

You haven't been paying attention.
Now, if you mean when will Shooter swallow the endless accusations and inferences of Trump being a crook, and a charlatan, and spy and so forth?

Look. There has been so much propaganda and lies and half truths spewed about Trump since he announced his candidacy that it's understandable how you've gotten a bad impression of Trump. It takes a lot to dig through all the bullshit and figure out what really has been going on, and what Trump is doing.

The bottom line is, there isn't much Trump has done that other politicians do in the regular course of business.

Ukraine is a great example; Biden brags about interfering in the affairs of ukraine for his own personal gain and even does it in front of cameras. Trump does something not nearly as critical, nor as apparent, and he's impeached for it.

The whole top secret documents thingy is another great example, and if you read the IG report on the investigation into Clinton's e mail server, and then look at Trump's "theft" of top secret documents you begin to understand just how politicized our Federal law enforcement has gotten.

You and the despicables can bleat about Trump all you want; you've happily swallowed your own propaganda and spin and Shooter doubts you'll ever understand just how demented you are, and how damaging all of this has been to America.

 

Stuck with Trump!

Best of......



Thinskin

 

Glenn's view.



Thinskin

 

Nope, this is wrong. Berger was fined $50,000, sentenced to serve two years of probation and 100 hours of community service, and stripped of his security clearance for three years.

There's a lot of "we know's", but not a lot of "how's" they know....

 

No one cares what Gabbard has to say except Republicans.

 

https://forum.xnxx.com/post-comments/1471319/
@Scotchlass

You might want to learn why and what they were investigating. Everything in question was from before Hunter Biden joined the company.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...over-period-before-biden-joined-idUSKBN1WC1LV

 

Trump may have declassified the document 's and media but he still stole the paper Ink and media they were written on.
They belong to the people of the US

 

Pretty sure no one gives a shit about some paper and ink, @Lxv200.

 

Actually it's a very valid point. To have taken them, there has to be deliberate thought into taking them in the first place. You can't possibly believe that those documents ended up in the basement of Mar-a-lago on accident?

That you can't see that Trump has high disregard for the national secrets of this nation...

 

The issue, anon is the paper and ink, according to @Lxv200 . Not the "national secrets of this nation". Lxv200 did not mention "national secrets of this nation". He talks about paper and ink. You can agree with that, can't you, anon?

Now, since we forgave bill and hillary for their theft of priceless heirlooms when they left the whitehouse, Shooter supposes if the issue is some paper and ink, we could just get trump to whip out his wallet and pay the government for the value of the paper and ink, don't you suppose? Even though, you know, the government already, allegedly, got all the paper and ink back. Right?

 

And I think you are putting words in his mouth. I think he was using ink and paper to describe hard copy, a colorful metaphor. You're taking it as black and white evidence that because he didn't mention national secrets that he doesn't care about that.

That he took them at all is the issue! Regardless of his having declassified anything.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...o-stealing-from-the-white-house-idUSKBN20Q2EG

As always, you're wrong about the Clinton's again.


And you trying to compare a bunch of furniture to national security is just laughable.

 

All shooter's metaphors are black and white.

Thinskin

 

Keep working on your reading comprehension there, anon, you are still seriously deficient in that area.

Now.
First, it is always risky to take peoples words for anything but what they obviously mean. Trying to read more into something than it obviously says just means you've managed to put yourself in a corner and are trying to wriggle out of it.
Fail.

Now, if you want to talk about what Trump took in terms of secrets, we can do that. When we know, if we ever know, exactly what he took and why, that is.
Cause so far, if we ignore the "sources familiar" and "anonymous source" and all the other bullshit attempts to legitimize what so far is despicable wet dreams, what we come up with is;

Kim's love letter to trump.
Stone's pardon order signed by Trump.
Obama's letter to Trump.
Trump's passports, two expired and one a diplomatic passport.

Now. It may be true that Trump took secret or classified or even super, super secret documents. But we don't KNOW that, do we? What we do know is that Trump gave documents back to the National archives when they asked for them back, and that he told them he didn't have other documents they were looking for. Then the FBI raided Trumps residence and took more documents. What those documents were, and if they were originals or copies or classified or declassified, we don't know, cause the only source we have is "anonymous".
And Shooter for one doesn't trust an "anonymous" source anymore than he does wrong story copy n paste from stumbler.
Neither should you, but that's shooters opinion. You do what you want.

 

MAGA

 

Deliberately or otherwise Trump concedes guilt in stashing documents!

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/23/trump-illegal-documents-fbi-mar-a-lago

Thinskin