Well, anon, you're once again proving what a fucking liar you are.
Shooter has supported reforms that will eliminate the dangerous, expensive treks people take to come to our borders and apply for immigration/asylum.
All you've done is encourage ILLEGAL migration cause, Biden.

Moving ILLEGAL migrants from overwhelmed border states that cannot begin to handle 5 MILLION ILLEGAL migrants to states that have declared their support for ILLEGAL migrants only makes sense.

Question, genius; How many ILLEGAL migrants have you taken in and supported?

 

Blowing your own horn again? Nice convenient coincidence!

Don't believe a word you say.

 

You aren't required to believe a word Shooter says to make it true.
But you didn't answer the question.
And you didn't respond to the issue did you?
Hypocrite.

 

So shooter, "Big protests in D.C. on January 6. Be there. Will be wild!" What exactly was Trump protesting?

Let's hear some facts in evidence.

 

Dismissed

 

Attaboy

 

It is actually kidnapping. The DeSantis equivalent of hey littler girls do you want some candy?

 

And just because you claim to have fostered these immigrants, it in no way mitigates what Desantis has done and is doing. But if you think it does, maybe you should contact the cop in Texas bringing the suit, I'm sure he will be more accommodating than I am.

But then again, I would think that someone who proudly and not so humbly brags about his generosity to migrants, you think he'd be just a little more I understanding of the situation of these migrants being used as political pawns in Desantis' games.

Or maybe shooter approves of the use of human trafficking for political posturing. I would ask, but shooter doesn't answer questions, he only walks the cowards path.

 

Well genius, where did you come up with the idea that shooter has fostered ILLEGAL migrants?
Get an adult to read the posts to you and explain them.

The cruelty is giving desperate people hope that if they can just trek thousands of miles to our border they'll be welcomed to the promised land. All they have to do is risk their lives and what little they have to maybe get here.

Your own cruelty is as bad. Sitting by while your president and his administration fail to even give lip service to border security or stopping this sham.

Its your president and despicables like you playing these people as political pawns.

You and your demented president are truly disgusting.

 

Serious question. Have you ever been able to keep track of all the things @shootersa claims? I try to shoot down as many as I can. But I admit I have lost count.

 

@stumbler if counting is your problem try taking off your shoes and socks ......

@anon_de_plume an adult could explain humor to you but find a deplorable to do it. Despicables don't have one.

 

Says the Trump Troll.

And yes, we obviously find things funny for different reasons. You laugh at people, I laugh with people. A subtle distinction lost on you. I do make exceptions for certain space aliens and their minions.

 

Anon reveLs his arrogance and his inability to maintain a firm grasp on reality.

Last word to anon so he can sleep.

 

The consummate game player hath spoken!

 

What the fuck? I thought government was supposed to encourage business, while protecting the consumer...

https://www.thestreet.com/stocks/desantis-anti-esg-law-may-force-key-business-to-leave-florida

 

You didn't read the article you posted, did you?

 

Disney Gets a Big Win In Battle With DeSantis
The Mouse House seems to have beaten the right-wing governor at his own game.

• Daniel Kline
• 8 hours ago

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis made Walt Disney his proxy for every company that embraces diversity and pushes what he calls "woke" values. That's a political marketing decision that seems pretty flawed because the presidential candidate could have made Starbucks, Target, or lots of other companies his target rather than going after the company that drives billions of dollars in tourism to his state.

Starbucks (SBUX) - Get Free Report and Target (TGT) - Get Free Report, however, while they clearly support values DeSantis does not agree with, did not specifically call out the governor. Former Walt Disney (DIS) - Get Free Report CEO Bob Chapek did exactly that, publicly taking a stand against DeSantis' so-called "don't say gay" legislation.




Chapek likely never wanted to do that, but many of his employees at Florida's Disney World expressed anger that that company did not stand up for LGBTQ+ rights, so he took a public stand condemning the legislation. Current CEO Bob Iger has not had to comment on specific issues, but he has made it clear that Disney could choose to spend some of the $17 billion earmarked for Florida development in other places.


DeSantis picked Disney because the company called him out, but also because it seemed like an easy target. He wanted to make the company an example by showing that if any business takes a stand on gay rights, diversity, or inclusion issues, Florida's governor would make them pay.

He calls it a "war on woke," but it's really a branding campaign where the governor wants to build his brand by contrasting himself with high-profile targets that support values the governor disagrees with.

The goal, of course, is to make DeSantis more popular at the expense of Disney's reputation. A new poll, however, makes it clear that those efforts have backfired.



Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek spoke out against a piece of DeSantis' legislation.

Getty Images/TS

DeSantis Less Popular, Disney Holds Steady
When someone runs for president, they need to build a national image and find an audience that supports their platform. DeSantis tried to use Disney to vault himself to the national stage, but a new June 15 poll from Navigator shows that those efforts have not worked.


"Over the last year, views of Disney have remained steady, as nearly two in three Americans (63%) express favorable views. By contrast, views of DeSantis (32% favorable) have declined substantially since November: he is now 16 points underwater with Americans overall (down from net +2 favorable in November) and has seen double-digit declines in favorability across party lines," the website reported.

Those changes are not just Democrats and Independents losing faith in the Florida Governor, his standing has also fallen by an even greater amount with Republicans.

"Views of DeSantis have declined net 17 points among Democrats, 18 points among independents, and 19 points among Republicans," the poll showed.

Americans Don't Want to Be More Like Florida
Navigator describes itself as "a project designed to better understand the American public’s views on issues of the day and help advocates, elected officials, and other interested parties understand the language, imagery, and messaging needed to make and win key policy arguments." It uses Global Strategy Group, an independent company, to conduct its polls.


This poll also found that Americans have cooled to DeSantis' idea of making America more like Florida.

"Since early April, Americans across party lines have cooled to the idea, driven by large declines among independents (net -31 appealing now, compared to net -5 in April) and Republicans (net +28 now, down from net +52)," the company shared.

The poll was conducted online June 2-5.

"Respondents were verified against a voter file and special care was taken to ensure the demographic composition of our sample matched that of the national registered voter population across a variety of demographic variables," according to Navigator's website.

https://www.thestreet.com/travel/di...n-battle-with-desantis?puc=yahoo&cm_ven=YAHOO

 

Really? That's all you got?

 

Well?
If you didn't read the article, just went with the headline, you've exposed your stupid again.
And if you did read the article, your comments to go along with your copy N paste of the article makes zero sense.

 

Here Stumbler, is the article you posted;

"Now, the state's Government and Corporate Activism Act, which will be implemented July 1, has caused a bank to reconsider its location in Florida.
The controversy surrounds environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues. The legislation would penalize state-registered banks if they deny services to specific businesses.
Oil, gas and weapons businesses are spelled out as points of contention.

In reaction, Climate First Bank, a St. Petersburg firm that says it is dedicated to the environment and sustainability, is thinking about leaving the state.
"The environmentally focused de novo, which launched in 2021, bills itself as a 'values based-bank,' focused on promoting sustainable business practices by providing banking services and loans to firm’s with a strong environmental, social and governance mission," Banking Dive reported.

Climate First Bank Is Weighing Its Options
Climate First Bank had taken some steps toward compliance with the law that DeSantis signed in May.
"The bank nixed its exclusionary list, which outlined the sectors it has said it won’t do business with, such as the fossil fuel sector or other extractive industries," Banking Dive wrote.
It also "eliminated all references to ESG on its website and in its internal dialogue, and replaced them with terms like 'values, mission or corporate social responsibility,'" CEO Ken LaRoe said, according to Banking Dive.
"We can change to another state -- different states have different requirements -- so we’d have to investigate all of that. But yes, we're absolutely considering that," LaRoe reportedly said.
"No one’s called and said, 'Hi, gotcha. Now, you have to take this application.' There’s been none of that. And I really don’t think there will be," LaRoe said, according to Banking Dive. "But if, for instance, a gun manufacturing company wants a loan, we now have to take the application and process it just like we would any other loan."

LaRoe Defends His Company's Mission
LaRoe had more words about the situation his bank finds itself in. He was very clear about his feelings on the subject, and did not reveal any weakness in his adherence to his firm's values.

"We’re not going to change our DNA. We were founded on the premise of changing finance to finance change and doing good, while concurrently returning market leading returns for our investors," he said. "And I think at the end of the day, we are still that."

He confronted a question about whether the bank's name was controversial.

"I said, 'Absolutely not. It defines the business, our mission and our values and everything,'" he said, according to Banking Dive. "Here we are, with the name Climate First Bank, squarely in the crosshairs, and I’m kind of proud of it."
​

So tell us, genius, how prohibiting banks from denying loans to businesses tied to Oil, gas and weapons is "anti business"??