Go back a page, I had a link to an article and part of an article posted about the latest polls...Now you should be able to find those...What proof have you shown me, absolutely nothing...You have posted lies that have been put up by Obama haters...That doesn't mean a thing to me...

Fifty-five percent of the people polled on the Wall Street Journal poll believe she is not ready and wouldn't be a good VP...I posted some of that on the previous page...Why don't you read it instead of just running your mouth???

 

"arguing" with these 3 is like trying to play football in a quagmire . . . you can still enjoy the game, but it is slow going :laughing:

Are you suggestiing that the church is not infallible?!??

 

OBAMA second largest recipient from fannie mae and freddie mac,,,,,,,,,,,,,,again in black and white

 

Well, I can't prove it.:satisfied: But I know it is true.

 

cunny, you silly silly man . . . I have yet to have this "truth" presented to me. I have asked and asked for it, but none of you who adheres so fervently to this truth can provide anything other than your say-so. :laughing:

You can rant and rave and expect that the more you say the same unproven things, the truer they will become, but that sounds like a recipe for ignorance to me . . . and it is a logical fallacy known as "argument by repetition" . . . and now you're a little less so.

 

but we are talking about osama i mean obama not biden so what your point about palin have to do with anything

 

dkr

Old Tool, you show your extreme immaturity just by posting this. You have your facts and I have mine. What is your point? My facts are wrong and yours are right, uh ok:rose:Saying it so? My facts have been common knowledge since bubbles decided to run. You obama supporters are oh so sad. Save the drama for your mamapeace

 

So, I take it that neither of you two cowboys has the stones (or brains) to support any of deirdre's arguments with fact - and now you're moving on to the Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae angle? :laughing: OK. Of course, you'd need to provide proof that your contention is even true . . .

Then, what is your argument? That taking money from corporations is bad? That Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are bad? That Obama was somehow linked to the poor fiscal decision-making that lead to the near-dissolution of those entities? Are you relying on the booegy-man effect to extract some emotional reaction? I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say

 

I RESPECT YOU OLD TOOL ,,,,,,,,,but you are doing the same as i,,,,,,,not proving anything ,,,,just reporting your ''say-so'',,,what do you think about that

 

I give up!!! No, we were talking about Palin...Go and back and read some of it...She's the noose around your man McCain's neck...

Just by you calling him "Osama" shows me that you aren't worth my time...

 

McCain vs a baby killer?, no contest in my book:rose: Why would Obama be to blame for what any women chooses to do about something in her personal life..how would he be responsible for others choices

McCain vs a muslim?, no contest again:rose: This is purely a lie Obama is NOT a Muslim, in fact he may be targeted for having turned his back to Islam

McCain vs a person who promotes voter fraud?, no contest again:rose: Again what others do is not his responsibility...what proof do you have of his first hand involvement...this is pure slander and malice

McCain vs a person who socializes with terrorists? no contest again:rose: He served on a board with him...how is this socializing. Again slander

McCain vs someone who believes "God Damn America"? no contest again:rose: He has never publicly said this and what proof do you have in his belief of this..NONE AGAIN Slander !

These things said here are some of the very things that are MISLEADING people about Barack Obama.

America needs LEADERSHIP NOW! and not the continuation of the republican MISLEADERSHIP!

 

dkr

Dpm..........wearing blinders all the way to the grave are you?, all that is TRUE, sorry you have such limited sight. Liberal trash aplenty at xnxx. I clearly stated my proof, if you choose to not believe my proof, that is you right.......to be ignorant of the TRUTH.:roseeace

 

He's too far behind with no time left. It's pretty much Obama's to win unless his supporter don't go out to vote.

 

This is what your therapist would call "mirroring" - using the same critique that someone used on you right back at them . . . the schoolyard equivalent is "nuh-uh, you are!" :laughing:

The difference is you have yet to provide any "facts" at all - every contention you cited is an opinion (we can go to the dictionary to discover the difference between the two, if you'd like ). Since you're the one making the assertion, it remains your responsibility to support that assertion . . . this is what grown ups do.

Of course you believe your opinion to be "factual" - this is an extension of the deep fear you have. You avoid having to consider that the very things through which you identify yourself may be hollow, so you label your ignorances as "common knowledge" and attempt to scoff at the non-believers. I'm sure it works on the weak-minded, so perhaps you should limit your rantings to that audience. :laughing:

Labeling me an "Obama supporter" is the single most laughable thing you cling to. :laughing: I wouldn't vote for the man if he were the last candidate on the ballot. But, that doesn't make your empty-headed rhetoric anymore credible. I understand why you must lump me into a "group" - so you can organize your mind around the black and white world you inhabit . . . I hope it's not too crushing when you finally discover that world doesn't really exist.

 

again

the democratic candidate WILL NOT admit to this,,,,if that is the proof that you seek from me,,,,,but like my dad told me,,,,'' IF IT LOOKS LIKE SHIT,AND SMELLS LIKE SHIT,,,,,,,,,,,WELL,,,,,IT MUST BE SHIT '' OBAMA tells you what you want to hear,,,,,,,,thats the bottom line.

 

I think I have not made any say-so here (yet) . . . I have refuted the argument deirdre put forth.

Here's how rational discussions occur - one party makes an assertion, then supports that assertion with fact(s) and/or logical thought. The other party may then agree or rebutt the original argument with conflicting fact(s) and/or logical thought.

So far, we can't get off the ground because the original assertions that deirdre (and you and tatman) have posted remain completely unsupported by any facts. I have already posted who I plan to vote for, and supported my position with 2 articles describing the thoughts of the person I support . . . if you'd like to refute my position, go to this thread:

https://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.php?t=63201

 

its just all slander,,,in your eyes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,truth against OBAMA in mine

 

:laughing:

you do know what the word, "proof" means . . . don't you?

proof (prf)
n. 1. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
2. a. The validation of a proposition by application of specified rules, as of induction or deduction, to assumptions, axioms, and sequentially derived conclusions.
b. A statement or argument used in such a validation.

3. a. Convincing or persuasive demonstration: was asked for proof of his identity; an employment history that was proof of her dependability.
b. The state of being convinced or persuaded by consideration of evidence.

4. Determination of the quality of something by testing; trial: put one's beliefs to the proof.

 

"Know thy enemy"..

deidre79 if you would read his posts you would know he's not a Obama supporter.

OT... I of course support your freedom of choice, whether or not if it the same as mine, makes no difference to me (as long as I know it's not for McCain...lol)

 

so, you're willing to believe any assertion made by the leadership of your preferred political party without so much as a single expression of the truth of the matter by way of factual data?!?? Wow! That is a truly extraordinary confession!

by the way, I have seen and smelled several things that appeared to be shit . . . and upon closer examination they turned out not to be shit at all. Again, thanks for demonstrating the end result of not engaging in any critical thinking . . . all due respect to Dad.