Men, do you think that women are as entitled to be as truly, freely and deeply sexual as men -- and to admit this -- or is it a turnoff?

 

People are entitled to be however they want. The only thing that I have any right to have a say in is how people are towards me, and that's it.

I don't ever want a woman to be anything but herself around me, completely, and I expect the same from her.

 

I think a truly feminine and complete woman is as truly, freely, and deeply sexual as a man. Human beings are social by nature, and express their affections in intimate relationships (at least partly) through sex. Women, if they are living to their potential, are equal to men in this regard.

Then again, what the fuck do I know?

 

Nicely said! Both women and men vary greatly in their sexual appetites, as is most certainly exhibited on this forum. Sexuality is what ever the individual makes of it. Agressive sexual behavior in women is a big turn on for me and I suppose for a lot of other men as well. Passivity on the other hand and being able to dominate may turn on others. However, as you so aptly said who the fuck knows?

 

I don't think society is as bad as it used to be towards women and their sexuality but I still think it is a tad opressive. Men are still called studs when they have slept with lots of women and women are still called slags when they do it.

I think women now feel more comfortable when they are with a partner they trust although even now some women still aren't happy with it

I think only with time will women start to come out of their shell and asking for more of what they want when it comes to men and sex

S :satisfied:

XX

 

I think women are MORE sexual than men. I mean, sure, men are horny all the time and will fuck anything that moves, but once we're aroused, women are capable of sexual feats that would leave men gasping for air, exhausted, and utterly spent. And we're just getting started.

 

Ah, but there's a fine distinction here. Women are, as you say, capable of incredible sexual activity. I think what's in question here is the level of sexual feeling and thought. Kimiko, I enjoy your posts here, and would love to hear your response.

And yes, I will fuck anything that's roughly human, has a pulse, and will lay still long enough for me to achieve penetration.

 

Well, thank YOU!

I think the difference is that women are slower to become aroused, and tend towards more depth of feeling. But once we get rolling, it's like high-balling it through the desert on the Super Chief.

 

I tend to agree with cumdrinker70. Although things are not as bad as they used to be, I get really pissed off when I hear anoter guy call a girl a slag/slut for doing exactly the same as he does.

As far as being turned on/off by it. ive never been one for sleeping with lots of girls myself, I prefer long term relationships. So based on that Im more likely to date a girl who like me hasnt slept with many people and prefers long term reltionships.
However, if I was single and there was a girl who I liked, who had slept around allot but wanted to put that behind her and have a long term relationship, then the fact she had slept with alot of guys wouldnt put me off being in a relationship with her at all.

 

I think a woman is more sexy when she admits to being as sexually liberated as a man, or more so. I love the term slut as it means that a woman is living to her sexual potential. If anyone, male or female, uses the term in a derogatory manner they are the ones with a problem. I am a male slut and am always on the lookout for my next fuck. I would love to meet a woman who is the same.

 

Women can enjoy sex as much as men can, but more conditions usually need to be present. It should always be easy for a girl or a woman to say, "No."

 

There's nothing sexier, in my view, than a woman who loves sex, says she loves sex, and shows you she loves sex with everything she does. Call her a slut if you want to, but the sluttier she gets, the more I love her.

 

I love sex. I love feeling the cock slip inside me. I do need a good fuck. I think about sex. I feel the urge often. I am all woman.

 

i would happily state that any man who does not feel that a woman is as entitled to be as sexually free as a man is not really a man at all, just a chauvanistic corporeal being inhabiting the body of a human male.

 

suppose it just depends on the girl..?

y'know, some can pull off being promiscous with a little finesse, where others are just too obvious about it flashing thier tits left right and center and making it well known they like to sleep around.

As much as people say it's easier for guys not getting called 'whore', it's still not cool to be a womaniser.. and flashing yoru dick will get you nowhere...
There's still a difference, but i guess it all depends on how subtle you can be at asleeping around

either way, girls are still free to do what they want.. in the UK atleast

 

..... *goes off on rant about muslim countries*


haha

 

I've got a girl visiting this weekend that is more open and expressive of her sexuality than I am.

I think it's kinda hot.

 

I agree with all these comments whole heartedly.

If I may add, a woman who is free to express herself whether exclusively or with multiple partners she is more likely to please you in ways that you never knew possible leaving her man totally exhausted to the point that all he can do is collapse from exhaustion. Thus in order to have a healthy sexual relationship both men and women need to be equally sexual to achive an orgasm both mentally and physically.

As a side note sex is totally part of are animalistic characteristics, one as a woman I am not willing to give up. No matter who or how many people look down on my belief.

 

- very true Kimiko.

Also, (not me, but some) men tend to rate (women) in relation to themselves.
*hypothetical thought, "why isnt she aroused yet? im aroused. she can see it. like an on switch."*

 

You sound like my kind of girl

If you lived near me I would love to have been one of your conquests. I would have give you so many orgasms.