the original thread was rerailed - yes i am a sock

his quote was not in a fantasy story - it is from a conversation

it was a good idea PW

i shroud my bravery in a pirate sock

flame away at me flamers :excited:

 

...yeah there is really no point in this......

 

hmm although i see the retardedness here

i do have to ask, did he actually say that? oh deary me.

 

Because lollylover's boast of having taken his fifteen year old daughter's virginity was posted in the Sexuality section, rather than in Sex Stories, his later claim to be innocent of incest and statutory rape is unconvincing.

A number of posters have admitted to incest and pedophilia on the XNXX Forum. lollylover probably imagined that everyone here thought that it is acceptable.

I do think it is acceptable, and even somewhat normal for a man to be attracted to underage girls. I acknowledge an occasional attraction myself. I think is not acceptable for a man to act on such an attraction, especially when the girl is as emotionally and financially dependent on him as his daughter.

"The most frequently reported type of incest is father-daughter incest.[2] Incest between adults and prepubescent or adolescent children is a form of child sexual abuse[3] that has been shown to be one of the most extreme forms of childhood trauma, a trauma that often does serious and long-term psychological damage, especially in the case of parental incest."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest

 

Is that really a word? :excited: j/k

Good job Sock

Tina :rose:

 

No, it should have been "retarditity". Everyone knows that...

 

This is a dick move.

 

from reading his posts, we can see that he is not a potential child molester, he is in fact a child molester. and his claims that he wrote it to be down with the cool kids at xnxx cuts no shit with me.

 

There is no purpose to this thread...This has been discussed over and over again...We'll never know if he's innocent or guilty, we all have our own ideas about it...

 

If ever you wonder whether a quote is actually quoted properly, you can click on the arrow next to the bold name you see in said quote ... it will take you to the original post.

I quite like that feature ... I have been on other forums where it is not offered.

 

Yes My Sister! This is the only thing worth discussing in a World such as we live it?
This Train has left the station,the Rabbit died,can we move on?

 

wrong again..The correct word is "retardaciousness"

 

I disagree Celestial Princess :excited:

As long as 2 or more people are willing to discuss it then there is certainly a purpose for this or any other thread.

Tina :rose:

 

we've bickered before in the past, Distant Lover, but I pretty much agree with you here..Although I won't really say I am ATTRACTED to underage girls..I will admit to being attracted to plenty of girls a hell of a lot younger than ME though..(and a few that are quite a bit older than me as well)

I think this whole thing is pretty simple though, and I don't get the endless debate..

If Lollylover's original post is true then he's a pedophile and also guilty of sexual abuse of his own daughter..That's pretty much indefensible..

If as he says this was just a story, while that's certainly better than the above possibility, it still doesn't much endear me to him..Nobody bothers to make up a story about a subject that they are indifferent to personally..Such a story means that though he may not have acted on his thoughts, he's certainly fantasized about them, and probably for a long time..

That an adult could harbor these kinds of thoughts for ANY 15 year old girl is bad enough..To have them about your own daughter is repulsive

so fuck him and fuck anyone who now defends him

 

and I voted "yes"

 

me too... but i still think that it should be reworded to take out the word "potential".

 

that might be going a bit too far as none of us know for sure if he REALLY fucked his 15 year old daughter

but even if he didn't, like I say, just the fact he was clearly thinking about it is bad enough

 

nope it is not :]

 

thanks for this, but i clicked on the arrow and it took me to a post by him but not the same one, odd =\

 

Try the arrow in this quote, it should take you back to the original thread

Tina :rose: