so all you people who believe in Free speech ave no problems with racist stories and comments on XNXX

after all if this argument justifies under age stories it can justify racist stories

just be honest with your self an try to think where you draw the line ???

free speech is a very precious thing but it can also be a terrible thing

 

I have no objections to the Stories that have been published. but there has to be a limit. there are stories and then there is fact.

the stories while only fantasy for some are much more real for others, examples are those people who were as children preyed upon by Pedophiles.

In my opinion the stories are not arousing in any way but i will not judge those who read them.

 

I don't read them but we all have the choice so I say let them stay.

 

freedom of speech? Yes

sick and disturbing? Yes


Answer to problem?

when people actually do get caught doing rape, pedophile acts, cut there little penis off right on the spot

 

i agree somewhat, but who will judge that somethings offend you that dont me and offend me and dont you...

 

oh your a rapist? i knew there was something about you i did not like

 

There's a 'slight' distinction between condoning paedophile/racist writings and/or 'having no problems' with it Tom...

The condoning of someone's fantasies put to paper isn't an argument to 'justify' those things in real life, because there is no justification, except maybe for paedophiles that their 'condition' could be an 'error of nature', just like being lesbian/gay is one...

The problem with trying to ban everything deemed 'dangerous' is that before you know it, you're back to burning books, because, where's the line?

Once you start applying censorship to racist/paedophile stories, maybe gay/lesbian stories are next. And then zoophelia, S&M and everything some 'moral majority' deems 'unhealthy'...

I say, let folks write what they want. We always have the option, when disliking the stuff, to not read further... But at least we can make-up our own minds...

 

Even for a one-celled organism, you are a dumb fuck, Willis...

 

This is me pertending to be jimjumo:

There are several reason why willis is not a one celled organism. Willis is not a micro organizam. One time back when i was fighing in vietnam i met a girl named Leu Chu we shared many latenights arguing if it was common or uncommon for her hair to alwase get pulled during sex but we all know the answer to that. and then i raped abunch of 12 year olds and desighted a interanl combustion engine so that the village could transport milk to the war front.

 

I voted yesterday I believe. I am all for people being allowed to write whatever they want... As long as it's fiction. Once it becomes reality it's a different matter. I wouldn't condone a young boy or girl being sexually abused, however if people want to write a story/stories about the subject that's fine. I don't have to read it, you don't have to read it. Just because it exists doesn't mean anyone is obligated to read it, and just because it's censored doesn't mean that anyone that wants to do that in real isn't going to. People don't get idea's for fiction in my opinion, if someone reads something and decides that it sounds like a good idea, it's because that was always in them.

This is the same with racism for me. I'm actually in middle of forming a story that is borderline racist, to be honest, but I myself despise racism, it disgusts me, but that's the point of the story... That character (or set of characters) isn't supposed to be liked, and while I can see that many have written stories where they have the young child in question seducing the older male (in most cases, let's face it) or are even passing it off as love rather than something evil, who are we to say that kind of thing NEVER happens. Sure, it's rare. Yes, it's unlikely to float everyone's boat, but the facts stand that it is just fiction and people should get over it.

Also, just to note, in James Patterson's first Alex Cross novel he makes note that our bad guy rapes a young boy after he has died, and in his second he writes what I have since described as THE most disturbing chapter within the pages of a best seller, where he describes (in great detail) a rape scene involving bondage and bestiality. These are part of best selling fiction, and have been accepted worldwide as fiction, surely people can see that there is little difference between what Patterson has done and what some of the authors here do..?

And just to add, I haven't read all of this thread, just scanned it, so if someones already made this point... Sorry for treading on it in my big heavy boots.

 

i have disagreed with you on many things Jimmy but as Long as you consistently hold this view you will get no argument from me

 

Got any pics? :excited: j/k

Seriously though, what happened to you is totally different. You were 19 and you weren't trolling for some 12 year old--you genuinely had no knowledge that she was a child. Pedophiles who read those stories are fantasizing about having sex with kids--and I draw the line there.

I wouldn't ban them--free speech. But I sure as hell hate them and deplore their existence.

 

I don't have a problem with racist stories on XNXX either. Or stories glorifying Hitler or Stalin. Or Hitler and Stalin gang-banging little girls. If I don't like the subject matter, I won't read them.

In fact, the only rule about content that XNXX should have is that the stories should be about sex.

Yes it can. Which is why people should be careful about what they say. But I'm opposed to enforcing it at the government level, and on porn sites. Although the counter side of freedom of speech is that websites should be allowed to define their own rules, I will not post any of my stories on any site that sets any kind of limit on the content. That's just a practical decision on my part; I've been burned a couple of times because of ambiguous or inconsistently-enforced rules. If XNXX were to change their "anything goes" policy toward stories, I would stop posting here as well.

 

Rather than write something very similar to the above, I think I'll just agree with it. Well said.

By the way, I'm still a little bit creeped out by the scene in one of Patterson's books in which the bad guy induces some kind of southeast Asian snake to slither into a captive girl by dripping milk into her anus with a plastic tube....

 

LMFAO!!!!

You've got to be kidding me. EVIL?
Do you even understand "statutory" means.
A few older women had sex with me when I was under age, and if they had gone to jail THAT would have been a crime.
Evil, lol, you slay me. No, really, you crack me up.

 

I voted yes, but then as an author Censorship is the kind of thing I go chasing down the street in the middle of the night trying to whack it with a baseball bat. I don't read it, and whether I write it is a matter of opinion (My "main" story line is a high school setting, with the characters ranging from 15-17, but not with adults). People shouldn't be told what to read or write, because that's the final step before being told what to say. And once they control how you talk, they control how you think.

 

Who am I to tell anyone what they're allowed to say? There are types of stories on here that I find disgusting rather than arousing. I just don't read them.

 

I just add 5 years to any underage depictions in my mind... it usually works fine

 

LOL!
Hey, whatever works for you man.:excited: