The results of this poll seem to reflect the opinions expressed much more accurately then the other poll, or so it seems to me.

 

Well, I'm willing to judge such people.

They ARE pedophiles themselves. And their interest in children is illegal, and so is kiddie porn, almost globally. Should they be allowed to post images of such behavior in the name of free speech?

What's the moral difference between a picture and a story? It seems to me, a lot of people are splitting hairs in order to make what THEY like OK.

 

I echo this was brilliant to me.

The stories i like to read on the Internet are dark, full of violence and non consent. Most people who read my favorite type of stories have similar reactions to stories like the ones we are discussing on this thread. These stories do not make me want to see them become real or I wish it would happen to me. Which is why I specifically like these stories and usually stop reading stories that go out of there way to convince the reader that this was real or could happen.

People with dark desires such a pedophiles are going to find each other and in all reality those looking for real life experiences are hiding from the public and not writing stories here I am. It is like people who think porn is the cause for sex abuse when we have had sex abuse throughout history and well before the Internet. When I went looking for my now husband for instance I learn of code words and phrases that some sickos use that they would never mention in an open forum.

I am sorry those for banning things then if your motives are pure you should be for banning everything especially if it is truly about children. Child sex abusers use regular porn to desensitize their victims so you should be against all porn and not even be on this site. But what it usually is when people get on their high horse it is more about feeling better about ourselves and being more comfortable in our desires and actions. In other words I do not like this type of porn so let us get rid of it so I can feel my type of porn is fine. It is about me me me and not the issue at all.

 

I'd like to know if the readers voted before or after they read the thread and if it played any factor in how they voted, or if it confirmed or altered how they wished they voted.

I'll go first. I read the thread after I voted. But it didn't change my mind any. It's still morally wrong in my eyes and it still skirts the limits of the law.

The problem is, people don't just mature over night. There isn't some biological switch that says this person is OK to fuck and this one is not. Physical and emotional maturity is a process. So we have laws to create an admittedly artificial boundary to use as a guideline, and it errs on the side of protecting youth from exploitation.

Stories like that tell the readers that it's Ok to ignore that boundary and I think anything that encourages people to avoid the issue of, 'is this person Ok to fuck?', is ultimately harmful to our culture and society, and the kids themselves.

 

Do you mean a picture of a real child, really being abused, as opposed to a fictional story?
Are you honestly saying that you can't see the huge, monumental, difference between the two?
Because if that is what you're saying then you have a real problem with the way that you perceive reality.

You can read about murder, write about murder, or even consider killing the person next to you, but until you act on it, you are not a murderer.
Whilst I can understand why some people have a knee-jerk reaction to this subject, to suggest that reading, and/or writing about something is the moral equivalent of doing it is perfectly absurd.

 

Just who the hell are you to judge and dictate what other people read. If you had bothered to read this forums rules, instead of acting like an immature troll, you would find out that it is ILLEGAL ON THIS SITE TO POST PICTURES OF ANYONE WHO IS OR LOOKS UNDER 18. That is regardless of the situation...

You have not been on here long enough to understand how this forum works, suggest you take some time and look around then come back and re-think your comments...

 

Hitler burned books. And he had a stupid moustache. Still...better to kill 6 million Jews than to read stuff. (thats sarcasm by the way just in case some of our less perceptive members get overly Zionistic on my ass)

 

question is what is under age?

anythin less than 16 should be deleted!

 

Are you sure you want your IQ deleting?

 

How old were you and how old were they?

I had experiences with older girls/women when I was very young, and it does just as much damage as an older man taking advantage of a younger girl.

I loved those memories for most of my life. I thought that any boy would be so lucky to be seduced by an older woman or girl. I even bragged about it back when I was in elementary school.

That was a few years ago. Fast forward to now, being 25 years old and wanting to be a parent, I have come to the realization that what happened to me was not a good thing. I don't want this fixation, and I truly worry about the girls and woman that did this to me and how many other lives they have fucked with.

 

I very much doubt that reading the thread would have any more effect on someone else's opinion than it did yours.
I've read a lot of twisted shit, but nothing I've read has ever made me even consider doing anything outside of the bounds of what I consider morally, or ethically correct.
I see no reason to believe that most other people are any different.

Well start your own site, and you can make that rule.

 

Quite a few people on here already seem to believe that physical maturity is all that matters, or are under the impression (read:delusion) that a 11, 12, 13 year old girl is psychologically ready for sex.

 

And what leads you to this conclusion, if I may ask?

 

sssoooo

wht abut a story in which father molested his 2 or 3 yr old daughter..is not disgustin?

 

If you think that a story subject matter is disgusting, then you have the option of NOT READING IT.....

 

Keep in mind that I see no need to have these stories removed...

That being said, I don't think the people having issues with this are concerned about themselves reading it. They seem more concerned about the fact that would-be pedophiles are getting their rocks off to these stories about young children being molested.

Eric the red: go into the stories section and read the comments made by people reading stories that involve underage sex, and tell me that you don't get that impression.

 

Some people on here believe that you have the right to post total crap...You have not been a member for very long so just how the fucking hell, can you make such a stupid statement...Considering the topic is about stories involving under-aged children, physical maturity or being psychologically ready for sex has no bearing on the matter..

A member could write a story involving a female baby dolphin and a male porn star having sex together, would this be wrong because the baby dolphin is not mature or psychologically ready for sex...
It is a story, if you do not like the subject matter DO NOT READ IT...

 

So in your mind, anyone that reads these stories are would-be pedophiles. Like anyone who reads a murder story is a would-be murderer. Or anyone that reads non-consensual stories are would-be rapists...

What do you call the people who write these stories, bearing in mind I have wrote 6 incest stories about a father and daughter relationship. Under your idea I must be a would-be daughter fucker, but this is unfortunate for your idea because I have no children but I can still write incest stories....

 

Stories are fine

When people come into the threads and say stuff like "I wish I had a little sister/daughter like that" or whatever other relation, that's not a story.

That's a person clearly stating that given the opportunity, they would engage in these acts in reality.

THAT is sick, and that is what I'm referring to.

 

No that is a person just stating that he wishes that he had a little sister/daughter like that. They have not stated that they WOULD engage in any sexual act in reality...If you believe that they would then you would also believe it when a person posts that he is 19 and has a 12inch long 4inch girth penis that can spurt cum for a distance of 6 foot...When all they are doing is WISHING that they had this....