As far as I remember she was told she could stay if she apologised, there was no pardon offered once she was banned.

 

It's funny, some members apologize for their actions and then go on to repeat the same offenses. They feel as long as they say they're sorry, that everything goes away.

A lot of leopards can never change their spots.

 

I had a minister once tell me that it is easier to do what you want and apologize for it later than to do the right thing in the first place.

 

Or shorts.:excited:

 

Just what is the point of being on this forum?

GD is like being on a race track and being allowed to go forwards, backwards and sideways as long as you stay within the barriers. You can change the car, the driver, the engine, anything you please... You can even change from a race to a smash up derby and have a crash n ban

 

I thought that nophest asked deirdre for proof where the Mods had shown favoritism...

If deirdre had found the post where chunky said "we need to make an exception in this case" when there was a photo of shake zulas baby son on this site. I think that His/her case would have been proven.

 

I was thinking if tcl apologised, to "Naughty", could he be allowed back?

After all, up till then everything was hunky dory :excited:

 

I have always had difficulty understanding priestly pedophiles. I assume they believe their religious doctrines. They must believe that forcing themselves on underage teenagers is a mortal sin. How can they keep confessing the same sins week after week that will send them to Hell? :?:

A great psychological novel is waiting to be written about a pedophile priest. It would be a first person account. He would write about his motivations, his experiences, his guilt, and his expactions of eternal punishment.

I could not write that novel. Although I am occasionally attracted to underage girls, i would never harm one of those precious girls, and hope that I would risk my life to protect her from harm.

 

Well, the thing is, if they confess, they DON'T go to Hell, no matter what heinous sins they're guilty of. At least, that's what the church says.

 

I would like someone to write about his execution.

 

Pedophile priests.

Right.

Sheesh.

Fucking euphemisms.

I don't know about the rest of the country, but here in Boston Massachusetts, the epicenter of the scandal, 99.999999% of the "pedophile priests" in Cardinal Bernard Law's Boston College Crew were nothing of the sort.

Most of the "children" were post-pubescent, so they were not pedophiles, first off.

Second, 99.9999% of the victimized adolescents were male. Which made most of Cardinal Bernard Law's crew pederasts, sodomites, and statutory rapists.

But the unbiased objective mainstream press did not play it that way here in Boston Massachusetts, Home of Diversity and Birthplace of Gay Marriage.

And before people cry foul, I am a moonbat liberal Democrat now, and I am celebrating diversity myself, and I am not trying to insinuate that there is any connection whatsoever between a society that would roll over for the sanctification of sodomy by marriage and a society that would hand the rectal passages of its altar boys over to a crew of ass-raping faggot Men of the Cloth every Sunday before choir practice.

There is no connection. No connection whatsoever. One has nothing to do with the other! Homosexuals don't rape! Only sickos do! Life is a Rainbow, and pederasts are jerking off on the Pot of Gold.

Sheesh.

 

Just what is the point of an apology if you never meant a word of it?

 

I am an Episcopalian, so I lack a profound understanding of the Roman Catholic Church, although I frequently attend Catholic services.

When Jesus forgave a woman caught in adultery, and who was about to be stoned to death, He said:

John 8:11 Go and sin no more.

I assume that is implicit in Roman Catholic absolutions.

 

I miss deidre79 and want her to be invited back. She was one of the most fascinating. charming, and colorful posters here and did not deserved to be banned.

 

That's just silly.

He/she did deserve to be banned if he/she couldn't back up what he/she was posting.

You also should accept some responsibility, you were posting meaningless shite instead of looking for the proof that would have stopped him/her getting banned.

I suppose you were in the reflected glory of deidre anyway and you can still perpetuate this myth, so nothing has changed for you really.

 

So I've heard just like in confession..."Bless you my son, do 10 hail mary's and all will be forgiven"....until the next time.

 

This is odd. That retard Stumbler has made more accusations against the moderators than anyone.

But he is still here. It must be because no one really pays any attention to what he posts.....:excited:

 

Depends on what Hell you mean...there could be a few aussie priests experiencing the Hell inside a prison cell sometime in the not to distant future.

 

The act of calling anyone who has sex with a minor a paedophile is the fault of the media, their continual misuse of the word as led it to be applied right across the age range, sex with a pubescent teen is the act of an hebephile, but that does not have the same force and horror as paedo.

Paedophilia - sex with pre-pubescent children
Hebephilia - sex with early aged pubescent children 12 - 14.
Ephebophilia - sex with children 14 - 18.

There are a couple more offences of sex with toddlers and babes in arms but I fail to remember the names for them.

As you see it is easier to clump all "nonces" under the one name for the media as the others lack the impact of paedophile, and rather resemble some sort of blood disorder.