Perhaps not, but I stand by my statement that Obama's record on job creation is better than Bush's, especially when you consider that Obama has spent the last two years attempting to dig out from an economic calamity that happened on Bush's watch.

 

I don't think so. Obama would win that matchup in a walk, without ever leaving the Rose Garden, with or without Perot.

 

And the employment picture is actually beginning to improve. That's why I also thought it was hilarious to see the conservative/Republican/Tea Baggers on the board claim President Obama was on a vacation in South America.

Bullshit. Brazil is looking at billions and billions of dollars worth of infrastructure improvements and projects to get ready for the 2016 Olympics and president Obama was courting those immediate business and contractor opportunities while the conservative/Republican/Tea Baggers in congress are trying to outlaw abortion and reaffirm in God We Trust.

Oh yeah that's going to create the jobs they campaigned on.:excited:

 

And it may be time to remind them how many days George Bush spent on his movie-set/ranch during his presidency.

No, the Republican position is simple....if Obama is doing something we don't like, doing something we DO like, or something we said we liked last week on video, or doing nothing at all, we'll find a way to criticize it.

 

There is no argument on the fact(s) that the private sector job market has had some horrible hits in the last four years, recessions seem to do that.

Job creation in the private sector is still a result of an expanding market, no other factor impacts it as well. It is quite easy to pump false money into the economy by expanding the public sector, but that growth is not self-sustaining.

To crow about the "success" that Obama has seen in the current job creation myth, is quite foolish. About on par with those who defend Bush's record in that regard.

 

No shit and one fucking lie they tell that just enrages me is: "Just that look at all the golf days President Obama has taken." No kidding. After Bush gave a flippant answer to a question about the war he'd started in Iraq where American troops were dying and then followed that with "Now watch this drive" he didn't have nerve enough to show up on a golf course again and gave golf up for some empty ass symbol of self sacrifice.

But if you compare actual vacation days Bush had more than three to one compared to President Obama.

PS Can you follow the Newt Gingrich flip-flops in the past two weeks? I have lost count at half a dozen.

 

You expect me to believe a blog that states the right did NOT offer an alternative to Obama's wreckless $814 billion stimulus package that has cost the taxpayers so much in waste and fraudulent spending. All of Obama's spending has created a very small output, our economy should be booming by now, but the fictitious government numbers are still hovering around 10% where it should be 5-6%, according to Obama's numbers.

 

Bullshit,,,,Obama was catering to ''Drill Brazil, DRILL, because Obama wants the U.S. to be Brazil's best consumer.. Soros needs to make a profit off of the backs of the U.S. taxpayer, again.

 

Neither one of them need to be anymore than what they are already doing. I wont vote for either one of them. I hope you do though.:excited:

 

Now, now, Ace, let's not try to make that poor old dog hunt again shall we? Its way to crippled up to even run.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp

 

Sorry not true the five trillion figure includes the two wars that Bush started. The truth however is that no one in washington is going to cut spending because americans want those programs. They just don't want to pay for them. Taxes are not theft and all the waste fraud and abuse they are always after turns out that the government doesn't waste all that much money and one mans waste is another's vital program like the four billion we give to wal mart ever year as a direct subsidy.

 

I stand corrected, at the moment.

 

all you liberals in here do realize it is due to liberal democrats that the 100 billion has not yet been cut. and yes i do believe it is totaly unnecessary for the government to fund maple syrup research, pay for health care for thoe to lazy to pay for it themselves, or pay some hundreds of millions to china to build high speed trains for us(cause thats investing in our economy ) and to hand brazil money to drill in the same f*****g places where they wont allow american companies to drill just so we'll later have to give them more money to get the oil we gave them money to drill for in the first place.. uuh.. duhhh.. . notice i didnt have to call anyone names to make my point.. just facts

 

You did not post any facts, just attitudes.

 

View attachment

 

There are a bunch of facts in alex0isda0man43 post, and alex0isda0man43 has an attitude about it.

 

you so smart........

 

Are you really this dumb

The republicans run the national debt from 1 trillion to 5 in a handful of years and you salute that because .. who knows. Then they elimitate taxes on the rich, fire the IRS lawyers who go after the rich, and start two wars that will cost us untold Trillions before theyre over (we handily keep them "off budget" while increasing the size of the onbudget defense budget at the same time). His deregulation IDIOCY causes the world economy to crash....

And your rationale is "Oh ya! Well obama is worse" (golly thats not the thought pattern of a child at all).. even though he is , over the vehement objections of corrupt gop scum, trying to repair the economy and has realistically already created more jobs than bush did his entire time in office?

That is simply delusional, childish thinking. Why someone would wish to practice such deep doublethink, lie, and cheerlead for people who view you as a serf to be used is hard to fathom.

 

HELP ME

EVERYBODY CAN SHOW ME, HOW TO GET SOME MONEY.
I WANT TO A PORN MOVIE ?
:rose:

 

Yeah, and all of them thoroughly documented on video. The guy is comic gold.