Ah, the class envy starts anew.

 

Here's a link with the ad by MoveOn.org.

http://www.rollcall.com/news/-203773-1.html

 

​

“There’s class warfare, all right,” Mr. Buffett said, “but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” Warren Buffett NYT 11-26-2006.

 

sure why not^

 

This is ridiculous. The concept of class envy/warfare is just a leftist commie pinko Marxist myth. Gov. Walker is looking out for the best interests of the honest, hard-working taxpayers of his state. Those are the ones who elected him after all. That's all that the situation in Wisconsin is about . . . balancing the budget.

I have a bridge to sell you, too.:roll:

 

Horsey...gotta love him

 

Warren Buffett can donate all of his billions if so wishes. However, someone needs to look at the reasons why the income and wealth divides happen in all societies.

If it is because of bias in legislation, then ask why it is still happening, the Democrats have enjoyed many decades of controlling the purse strings of the US, why did they divides occur even then?

You folk have been sold a bill of goods and you continue to buy it, even when you are broke.

 

Nice chart, however irrelevant.

 

The redistribution of wealth from the middle class and poor up to the top 5% of the wealthiest people in this nation occurred under Ronald Reagan and George W Bush.

 

Now this is delicious irony to me

Remember the prank call from a reporter pretending to be David Koch to Governor Scott Walker which of course Gov. Walker took and revealed how much influence the Koch Brothers actually have on Walker and the national GOP/Tea Party war on the middle class?

Well it may be no joke now because Wisconsin democrats have filed a complaint alleging Gov. Walker broke several Wisconsin state laws during his conversation with the impostor.

Specifically they contend Gov. Walker:

http://crooksandliars.com/

 

OMG Jon Stewart has a great send up of the Wisconsin Democrats.:excited::excited::excited:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/08/daily-show-wisconsin-14_n_832747.html

 

The wealth was not redistributed, it was never possessed with the poor and middle class. There is no limit on the total wealth in the world, it is an infinite number. Wealth is a mirage, assets have value only when redeemed, the amount of the value is determined at the time of the transaction. Money has only the value determined by what it will buy, it's true value is an ever changing phenomenon.

Wealth is created when the fruits of industry and service bear a profit, the profits contribute to wealth as they are accumulated.

 

This will probably backfire on the Dems, if Walker is exonerated from on the charges they will lose a lot of traction. They may have been better off allowing the bloggers and fringe media speculate.

 

It happens because the wealthy are able to control what the government does, and game it to benefit themselves. Most wealthy corporations these days seem to get wealthier mostly by obtaining government contracts and exploiting government subsidies.

This stuff wouldn't work in a true democracy, but we haven't had that in quite some time.

 

Bullshit.

 

And just like Micheal Moore pointed out in his speech its a lie to say this country is broke. There's plenty of money around and corporations are making record profits. There's just no money in our hands because of the transfer of increased wealth to the richest people and corporations.

I also would point out again that these transfers of wealth usually take place when the Republicans control both the presidency and congress, by making changes that allow a segment of our economy to be looted and then bailed out by the government.

It also occurs when they create artificial bubbles like the dot.com bubble or housing bubble and then once its feeding on itself take their money and run collapsing the bubble as they do.

 

Economic growth will always be limited by the availability of natural resources and the level of technology. It should be limited by environmental considerations.

Increasingly companies strive to become more profitable, not by increasing the number of customers, but by reducing the number of employees. It is not clear how the government can prevent this. Efforts in one state will encourage companies to move to states where the efforts are not made. Efforts made at the national level may encourage companies to move to countries that are more "business friendly," which is to say, "more unfriendly to employees and the environment."

Nevertheless, it should be clear that business executives who receive raises and bonuses after laying off a significant percentage of their work forces are not producing wealth.

 

You still have no idea of what the difference is between wealth and income.

But it is fun watching you argue something of which you haven't a clue.

 

You also seem to lack a grasp of what wealth is.