Almost, but I'm working and I have a call in ten minutes. It wouldnt do for me to start the call with

"Alright you fuckers, I love you all. You're my best mates you are. Yeahhhhhh!"

 

No. Not really :lol:

 

I'm sorry, but has this become a PM thread?
Should I step out?

 

Kívánok jó éjszakát.

 

No. You welcome here

 

Szeretném, ha nem kellett

 

Yeah, see, I can't read Hungarian so...

 

Shall I whisper sweet nothings in Cajun French for you, dear Eric?:excited:

 

Like many criminals, pedophiles try to decriminalize or normalize their crimes. Even Ted Bundy said that he was misunderstood. However, there is a concerted agenda that pedophiles are pushing!!!!

Computer technology and the Internet enables pedophiles to locate and interact with other pedophiles more readily than ever before. Although pedophiles luring kids on the Internet is a horrifying problem, the long-term organizational aspects are more terrifying.

The common gathering place and the resultant support child predators are providing each other is probably their most significant advantage, -- and the most troublesome for a concerned public. The computer, a common household fixture, is now a place where pedophiles can go to hear others say, "You're okay and what you're doing is okay; don't listen to the rest of the world, just listen to us."

The ability to receive and offer comfort within the support of their like-minded group reinforces pedophiles with the belief that their attraction to children and adult-child sex are an acceptable way of life.

In this online community, pedophiles view themselves as the vanguard of a nascent movement seeking legalization of child pornography and the loosening of age-of-consent laws. They portray themselves as battling for children’s rights to engage in sex with adults, a fight they liken to the civil rights movement.

Child predators are forming an online community and bond that is unparalleled in history. They are openly uniting against legal authorities and discussing ways to influence public thinking and legislation on child exploitation.

A pedophile refers to a man or woman who has recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, urges, or behaviors involving pubescent or prepubescent children, a simple correct diffenition.

How many times have we heart "it just a fantasy";

"I don't think any child should be touched sexually or non-sexually against their will," McClellan said (A convicted sex offender).

There are countless more that I have seen on the forum to support this behaviour.



Lets see what the largest organized pedophile group on the Internet says:

Why Was This Document Published?

The discourse about sexual contacts between different age groups, particularly those that take place between children and adults, has reached a dead-end. The parties on either side of the argument are no longer on speaking terms. Those who have taken it upon themselves to protect every boy from every xxxx place the blame squarely on the xxxx. To further their cause, these people do not bother to separate fiction and hearsay from the alleged facts. Their doctrine still nourishes from several centuries filled with repressive sexual standards. When child sexuality became taboo, the thought spread through our collective conscience that a child is simply not a sexual being. Sigmund Freud ventured past this taboo. Since that time, the attempt has been made to restrict the newly discovered sexuality of children by means of legislation. The imbalance of power which governes the relationship between adults and children was swiftly expanded to include the subject of sexuality. The adult members of our society mandate how a child is to cope with his or her own sexuality.

The attempt to employ restricions and punishment as a means of child rearing often causes the child to experience serious conflicts. While may traumatise the child, it will certainly do nothing to further his or her natural development in the future. The discrepancy between the desire a child may experience and the restrictions placed upon these desires by society harms the natural and healthy development of his or her own sexuality. As a result, these children will suffer from some psychological damage even as adults.

This document presents the opposing point of view. At the same time, it attempts to liberate children and adults from many false premises which govern our relationships and our sexuality. In view of the social and cultural position of a xxxx, an attempt will be made to present his fundamental ethics - particularly the rights of the boy and the boylover's responsibilities.


The Boylove Relationship?

In most cases is the attraction between the boylover and the boy is mutual. The boy is drawn to an adult who takes him seriously and treats him respectfully. The boylove relationship is void of the demeaning power struggles and restrictions which are customarily are part of any child/adult relationship. In a boylove relationship, the boy is afforded the chance to experience himself as a person. A person who may have and express his own opinion, without running the risk of having it cast aside as unqualified, or even "childish". His spirit, as well as his body, are seen as a whole. Not as something that is still in the process - a developmental stage on the way to adulthood.

A child is commonly viewed as someone who needs to grow up in order to become a person. Society applies adult standards in order to shape and mould the child. Personality traits that may be considered undesirable or inconvenient, are often removed in the process of child rearing and education.

As part of a boylove relationship the older partner accepts and nourishes the spirit of the child. The boylover doesn't try to apply adult standards of behaviour in order force the boy's spirit to fit the mould. The boy experiences this acceptance of his own unique character as something very special and pleasant. He feels free to develop and grow, because his partner treasures his personality and takes it seriously.

Although the adult partner is always in a position to exercise power over the child, the boylover tries to avoid any power struggles within the relationship. However, the boylover must be aware of the fact that an imbalance of power is present in any adult/child relationship. Therefore a situation may arise where he may need to raise this topic with his partner.


What Are The Rights Of The Boy?

First and foremost it is the right of the boy to develop his personality and his sexuality freely. This rule must govern every boylove relationship and it does. Any physical or psychological pressure inherently infringes upon this precious right. Further, any restrictions that may interfere with the development of his personality, or those that may prohibit him from experiencing his sexuality without restraints, may also be considered an infringement of his rights. It is the boylovers responsibility to shape the relationship in order to comply to the wishes and needs of the boy. It is also his responsibility to ask questions and listen carefully. Most importantly, the boylover must not interfere with the autonomous development of the boy.

The boy has the right to be protected against physical or psychological abuse. It should also be considered a form of abuse when a boy is prohibited from exercising his rights to experience a loving relationship, or if he is not allowed to experience and develop his own sexuality. The rights of the boy should be respected in this regard, too.


What Are Our Demands?

We demand the freedom of individual sexuality for boys and for xxxx.

We demand that current standards of sexuality are reconsidered. These standards infringe upon basic human rights, because they prohibit children and those who love them from even thinking about engaging in any sexual intimacy.

We demand that any medical, psychological or religious notions which are preconceived against child sexuality, be exempted from a discussion about new sexual standards.

We demand that children as well as xxxx be included in the current debate concerning sexuality between children and adults. At this point, the "experts" are people who have gained their knowledge about intergenerational relationships from books and statistics. It sounds incredible: there are people who are defending the best interests of an age group and they haven't even bothered to ask members of this age group if this representation is desirable, or in their best interests.

We demand our freedom of speech in the media. The internet is being targeted as the forum for xxxx. We demand to be held to the same standards as every other participant in the internet: if there is nothing illegal being published on a "xxxx" then this site may not be shut down, or censored at will.

We demand a forum for open communication between xxxx. A forum that is entirely free from repression. This discourse, support and a sense of community is important. It is a place to discuss sexual ethics and a forum that will be reached by boylovers from around the globe.

We demand that society reconsiders the status of the child. This is our most important demand. Since children are not granted their own personality, and since they are not being taken seriously, there are "experts" who may represent their "best interests". And as long as we allow this representation to take place, children will be denied their right to develop their own personality, as well as their own sexuality.


End of that quote, I x'd out the site name.

Pedophiles want to have sex with children, but that’s illegal, so they seek to promote a child’s right to have sex with them. One point of the pedophile agenda is a mistaken belief that there are children who want to have sex with adults, especially old adults.​

In general, this is just plain wrong. There are a few children (meaning under 18 years old) who say that they want to have sex with adults, but they are few, very few, like I could count them on one hand without taking off my mitten. These children have been abused in the past and have survived the abuse by internalizing the pedophile’s desire. It’s like Stockholm Syndrome, where a hostage identifies with their kidnappers and sympathizes with their aims in order to survive the ordeal. Just because some children have developed an aberrant survival mechanism does not mean that we should allow other children to be abused.​

Becareful what you ask for!!!! Since the only argueemet that I see that the "Pedophile" supporters use is flamming and name calling I doubt there is much possitive discuesion on this post.​

This thread has got sooo derailed it's silly!!!!!​

 

liltx....you know me....we've chatted, though not recently. You KNOW I am not here condoning the abuse of children. As I posted to SK previously, you cannot take care of a child who dies as an indirect result of abuse and condone the abuse...it is not possible.

My only point...and it would seem the same for people like ejls, Eric, and others....is that to come on a porn forum and appoint yourself the morality police is both hypocritical and annoying.

The majority of us here, have some form of repressed sexuality....whether it be that we are bisexual, homosexual, or heterosexual with some serious kink. Lots of people come here because this aspect of their sexuality would not be accepted in the real world....I mean let's be honest here....if we were being completely satisfied....both sexually and emotionally in the real world we wouldn't spend nearly as much time here.

I have no problem with having true pedophiles banned, jailed, sodomized....or whatever else the morality police want to do with them....as I said I have seen firsthand the damage they can do. HOWEVER, I do have a problem with people being branded pedophiles simply because they read/write about underaged sex. I have a problem with people believing that I would seek out or consent to rape merely because I get off reading such brain trash.

If someone on here wants to go after supposed pedophiles....go for it. I have better ways to spend my time....like reporting the real life fuckers who come through my ER. Like volunteering at a abuse victim's support group. If the morality brigade wants kudos for stemming the flood of pedophilia....why in the hell are they hanging their shingle on A PORN FORUM????

 

Post of year award for you! Wonderful statement, said it perfectly. Love the following most.

"I have no problem with having true pedophiles banned, jailed, sodomized....or whatever else the morality police want to do with them....as I said I have seen firsthand the damage they can do. HOWEVER, I do have a problem with people being branded pedophiles simply because they read/write about underaged sex. I have a problem with people believing that I would seek out or consent to rape merely because I get off reading such brain trash."

+100

 

Never expecting an apology from you, because you have not said anything that needs apologising for...
Where your confusion lies seems to be this:

As this site operates a "freedom of expression using the written word" policy, everyone gets so agitated when they read something that disgusts them....
My stance is that this policy is there for ALL, but members should use common sense when posting comments on emotive topics...
It is NOT just the case that a person can write about molesting children, just because they can. It is also about PROTECTING any persons freedom to write what-ever they want. This freedom extends to you and me also everyone else on this forum. Just because YOU choose to exercise this right by posting your opinion, DOES NOT make it WRONG for any other member to post what they think. The only restrictions are the ones in this sites rules and guide-lines...

Put it another way: A few members on here decided that anything written involving public sex is wrong and should be banned..Just how many members would tell this small minority to "shut the fuck up as we have a right to post stories that involve public sex."
Now this right to post stories involving public sex, is EXACTLY the same right that exists for members to post under-age sex stories. CONSIDERING that BOTH of these example topics are ILLEGAL in many parts of the world, you should now have a clearer idea that this right is for EVERYONE, regardless of whether or not you personally find what has been posted distasteful..

This freedom of expression is very mis-leading, because it is either 100% for, or 100% against. You CANNOT have a middle ground, or be able to pick and choose when you agree or disagree with this policy...

It is up to the individual members as to how they use this right, I personally may not agree with what has been posted but I will NOT join a revolt that would DENY a persons individual choice...I am NOT saying that under-age sex is HARMLESS, I am defending the right of ANY member to post what they want...
Now you may think that this stance is DEFENDING pedo's, WHAT I would say is that my stance is DEFENDING ANY MEMBER, regardless if they post an under-age sex story, a gay sex story, a lesbian sex story, a public sex story, an anal sex story, an oral sex story, a vampire sex story and every other type of topic...

I know that a lot of people DO NOT like incest, but I chose to write a sex story in this topic. I ACCEPT any complaints or hatred against me for doing this, but it WAS my choice to write the story...

 

Yes please.:excited:

 

Absolutely perfectly said... I love and agree with the section that I have high-lighted in RED...Just wish that a few members now will see just how silly they look...

 

If he,s unsure

love my cajun food...and love my Zydeco....and the thought of a beautiful woman whispering cajun in my ear sounds mighty attractive....so....

 

Voulez vous coucher avec moi.. ce soir. C'est pour toi que je suis.

 

Uh, oui?
Is that the right answer?

 

Assurément:excited:

 

tu et Francaise??

 

Oui je parle un peu Francias...though the spelling of Cajun French is difficult for me....I never learned to write it.