Whether you're right or wrong, it points out a major inconsistency.


Underage sex is illegal, so stories featuring it are banned.

Rape is illegal; stories featuring it are not banned.

 

=============================================
No it is quite safe, I take it on a regular basis, when she has to cash my cheque from the welfare, roof repairs etc, and like Jayney says there is no way I would go without Sunday luch after seeing the strippers.

 

============================================
What you say is perfectly correct, in my opinion it should all depend on how the perpetrators are portrayed.

 

Only one problem with this theory my friend.
Who is to decide if the perpetrators are portrayed correctly?

Perhaps Lord Protector Wimmers might be appointed Chief Censor

I'm glad to know that you let your gf free on occasion, but if you nailed her to the bed more often you wouldn't have to restrict her.

 

But if he nailed her to the bed, she wouldn't be able to cook his Sunday Dinner, silly!

 

I meant a different kind of nailing.

 

Oooh, silly me! :roll:

I do get confused easily. I was terribly disappointed when a 'Nail Bar' opened up nearby recently.

I was full of hope and expectation, until I went in and found it was some sort of beauty salon :excited::excited::excited:

 

typo not grammar

That was a typo not grammar moron!

 

rape vs kinky sex

Some women seem to like rough sex, some fantasize about it, while have it forced on them. There are lots of women permanently scared before of rape and abuse.

I can not help wonder how many guys get the wrong idea about what women like when they read stories about women enjoying being abused. It may be just a story and they only like it with someone they know and trust. It is a very confusing contradiction is all I'm saying.

I do not believe in banning anything. Just don't read what you don't want to read.

 

I am glad you got he point.

"Mommy I hate going around in circles. Shut up or I'll nail your other foot to the floor."

"I hate my sisters guts. Shut up and keep eating!"

"But mommy I don't want to see grandma. Shut up and keep digging!"

 

dont ban anything. just dont read about things u DONT LIKE

 

I thought I just said that?

 

Really? Who is the moron...the person who calls me a moron for pointing out his grammar mistake which he still hasn't fixed?

It's "too" you dumbfuck, not "to". Look at your signature block, again, and fix it, again.

Idiot.

 

No you did not, try reading your post again and you will clearly see that you have said BAN...

The post has been quoted below, and I will high-light your words to make it easier..

 

You noticed it aswell, saved me the job of posting a comment up...:excited::excited::laughing::laughing:

 

If you do not believe in banning anything, WHY did you start the thread...

 

*wonders* does this mean your going to ban my stories? *cries* I'm sure my fan club might have a thing or to to say about that... but you all do what you think is right okay?
Lets seen what exactly is the rule????? where is the line precisely so that we know which stories we have to take down...

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Firstly nails in the bed are no good, that's how you finish up with scratch marks down your back, you don't want that do you?
============================================
Regarding a censor; to be quite honest I think a FAIR one would be an excellent idea for this site. Instead of a blanket ban;some stories which contained under age could be allowed in certain circumstances. This would mainly be about people of the same age however.

I did intend it to mean that rapists are not portrayed as good decent citizens; unlike almost all of the pedo stories; where the kids are exploited. Like I said though, this is only my opinion.

 

You didn't follow-why are you so thick today.
I'll amend my statement- you need to nail her in the bed, not nail her to the bed.:excited:

The other point though - are you nominating yourself to be the censor.
What you say is fair -others disagree with you - they are wrong?

I just read that a singer was performing the 70's song Kung Fu Fighting at a festival in England and was areested for suspicion of hate speech because two Chinese heard it and were offended and complained to police.
The English version of fair censorship?

 

Why do we need a censor, we have mods to control what is posted...
All they need is a statement of guide-lines on which to work to...

Also, as we are all supposed to be adults, the members can police themselves. If a member posts a story which provokes wide-spread anger, then they should be privately informed that this type of story will not be tolerated and if they post a similar story then they could be banned..
They could be advised and guided in ways to make their story acceptable, maybe just highering the ages by a few years. Making a 7yr old girl into a 14yr old girl but keeping the main bulk of the story..

It is then the members choice as to whether or not they take the advice given..