Thanks to President Obama, the Democrats, and the Supreme Court a year or two from now you would be right.

But why should he and his insurance company have to pay just because some gun nut shoots you on accident or on purpose.

No that would be his and his insurance company which makes people carrying liability insurance on every gun they own a very practical thing

No people using guns to massacre innocent people is the problem and topic of this thread.

What's your solution for that?

 

An American flag, and chants of "USA! USA!"

 

Damn and all this time I thought bullets killed...unless someone slugged you with a gun...

 

"Guns don't kill people. People kill people," is as stupid a cliche as, "The United States is a republic, not a democracy."

 

Here is my solution!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobil...dawkins-internet-cafe-shooting_n_1682519.html

 

i just said it's morons that own the guns. Do you own guns? the laws are strict! if you buy a gun the right way! any clown can get a gun off the street!

 

It's the person behind the gun that causes the problem. When I was growing up my dad(RIP and Semper Fi) had a preban government issue M16A1 with a 100 round loaded magazine next to his bed I never touched it even when I felt like killing someone. I insted turned my rage on a heavy bag or ran.

 

Yes. I have all my life. And I'm willing to bet I can out shoot you with your guns let alone mine.

But that being said its clear to me we have more gun rights in this country than we've got gun sense or responsibility. That's why as I think you point out we've got loaded guns falling out of kids pockets at school.

That, however, still pales in comparison to everyone having a right to own guns but people not having a right to go to a theater and not get shot and/or killed.

Now, that's a fucking problem for all gun owners. So us gun owners need to step up and come up with some practical solutions to stop or at lest cut down on this kind of carnage.

Otherwise they will eventually be coming for our guns and have damn good reasons for doing so.

 

Good for you. Then you ain't the problem are you? The problem those who do choose to commit mass murder with assualt rifles and 100 round magazine.

But thanks for admitting that neither you or your dad ever needed it.

 

I have over 400 guns all legal but I'm responsible and they are stored with the ammo in a 16'X20' room surounded by 2 feet of re-enforced concrete and locked behind a 3,000lb blast door the kind used in missile bunkers. Yes the room doubles as my storm shelter and bomb shelter.

 

We never used it to against a human but those raccoons sure hated it.

 

Pretty useless then aren't they? As far as I know a man needs a high powered rifle, a shot gun, and a .22 to do everything you want. Pistols are an extra indulgence. But I do own a couple of them. A .22 Remington Jet (bet you never heard of it) for fun and a .38 in case I need to kill you.

PS You realize shooting racoons with a high powered assault weapon with a 100 shot magazine makes you look a little sick and crazy don't you?

 

NRA Members Agree: More Gun Regulation Makes Sense

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/07/24/577091/nra-members-agree-regulating-guns-makes-sense/

 

I agree with those regulations, hell we already have them in place were in Ohio, but not one of those would of stopped Holmes. Nor would they stop anyone that is planning on doing what Holmes did.

There is an old saying "Locks only keep honest people honest"

 

I think we both agree there's no way to stop the Holmes. But limitations on assault rifles and high capacity clips would have helped cut down on the body count.

Check this out. Can you own a fully automatic machine gun in this nation and shoot it all you want if you can afford the ammo?

You bet you can. In fact I bet there's tens of thousands of people who own machine guns in the us right now in the US.

Do we have any problem with those machine guns?

No. Because they won't just let any fool buy one and you have to go though a thorough registration and licensing process to legally own them.

I'm thinking its time for the same thing with assault rifles and high capacity clips.

 

WHAT IF?

what if one person was an offduty policeman in that movie theatre or what if there was a
concealed carry licensee there to defend themselves and others, would the casualties be less

 

That's what the plaintiffs will be asking in their law suit. No to mention an alarm on the emergency exit. That's who's going to pay for all this carnage. Not the killer. The theater owners. Because that's all the victims can sue.

But aside from one suspected bullshitter claiming a .50 will shoot through body armor and he's the one who could have done it an off duty police man with a conventional side arm would have been helpless and any regular citizen would have probably just added to the body count.

 

Why should the theatre be held at fault? Sue the manufacturers and gun shops for created and selling these things.

The person to blame and who is at fault is in custody, sue him.

 

Nope that's not the way it works over here and the NRA made sure of that.

 

How is the theatre at fault?