I posted the Wikipedia of my ~2300 person town I guess I'm a goner.

 

​

 

Gee whiz Beav,,is the denim rubbing your sack raw again,,slow your roll,,,,WTF??


and.......

Tell your off-spring SPJAMES,,that he/she/it is on total ignore.

 

No and OK.

 

If he posts it himself, doesn't that make him just as guilty of breaking the rule?

It's personally identifiable information, by the way. Who puts their address on their facebook page?

 

That's what I've been asking. The rule is very clear but instead of enforcing it the mods would rather do major favors for some members it appears.

You got me but that's one of the main reasons I've never even looked at Facebook. That and its led to more family fights and divorces than anything else I've ever seen.

 

Well maybe I should call the both of you liars, I know nothing of ballers real life, apart from the fact that he lives or claims to live in Upper Darby, if you think that that is a threat to his anonymity then people who post their towns in the "Location" part of their AV are breaking the rules, should we ban all of those?

The only thing that I saw posted was by billblondel, and that was an address. It was googled by someone and it turned out to be the address of a public park. Maybe the swings and slides are members here, why not go and ask them if they have a complaint.

Why do you dive head first into every situation without garnering all the relevant information, you are not the white knight of this forum, you are not even the slightly soiled off grey knight, go sit in your corner and get back to slinging political brickbats at those dastardly republicans.

 

Hey I already said IF Baller16 is telling the truth than I have some questions. And in case you missed I was quoting one of Baller's accusations.

Its not something I came up with.

Then you must have missed something. Smcaaphd already said on another thread that people who posted Baller16's personal information didn't get banned because Baller posted personal information about himself which only leads to another question.

If that's the case why hasn't Baller16 been banned.

Nope.

 

The old saying goes, "It's not what you know, but who you know". Mods are people, they are always going to give a friend a break. Cops do it too.

Cops will give a warning to a friend and a summons to someone else for the same offense. That's life.

 

Yet you are perfectly happy to take unsubstantiated information and run with it in a thread dedicated to it, why is that, is it the tactic of flinging enough mud to see if it sticks.

And if this "private info" is being thrown out for all to see why is the baller not being vocal about it, he shouts loud enough about any other perceived slight?

 

Unsubstantiated? No.

 

I think you need glasses, sir. That is not what the mod said. I copied this from the thread where she replied.

I will only answer the last question. It would be unfair to ban other members for posting baller's information when baller posts his own information.

You see? I think you misunderstood. And if I'm not mistaken, Mr. Baller has been on this site for a very long time. I can't believe that this posting of personal information is just happening now and didn't happen in the past. And if he did post his own personal information in the past, wouldn't Nympho, Piggit and Chunky have been charged with removing that information and banning Baller?

I'm not sure how it works here, but on the site I consider my home site, mods give a warning before banning. Sometimes members aren't aware of rules. Sometimes they say things in the heat of the moment. I know that was my case. I got into an argument and called someone by their first name. I shouldn't have done it but I forgot myself.

I like this site. There is a lot of freedom here but I also think members push the boundaries of abuse. Maybe rules that were made years ago should be revisited today.

 

Why don't you try actually reading the thread. He is complaining about it. And if you really want to find out what's going on read this thread where Baller16 made the accusations.

https://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.php?t=6000&page=10

It starts about post #498.

 

She did say Baller posted it first. If equal treatment was applied, all would have been warned or banned.

 

Two quick points. One I don't see how you can possibly get what you said out of what smcaaphd wrote even when you quoted it.

And two how is it that someone who joined in October 2011 knows what Piggit and Chunky should have done or even know about them to begin with since they've been gone longer than that.

 

I would agree with you, but what constitutes personal information and where do you draw the line? Are we allowed to use first names here? And just because someone calls you Phil, because that's what you told him, is it true? Maybe your real name is Bill - so do you get banned for telling people an untruth and letting people assume it is your real information? Does he get banned? After all, he did not post personal information because it was a lie to begin with.

We all hide behind the anonymity of the internet. We can say what we want and act how we want because no one really knows who we are. And in the scheme of things, does anything that happens here have any consequence in your real life?

 

Just because this account was opened in October 2011 doesn't mean this is the first time I've been here.

 

Baller claims his attackers are getting personal information off his Facebook page and posting that on the forum.

But as to your other point I think its obvious that equal treatment is not being applied by our moderators.

 

Dont worry yourself over stumbler,, he gets like this when he and his leftists are shoved up against the wall,,his sack starts to get rubbed raw and this is what it leads to,,us listening to his theatrics and hysterics,,,he might even be constipated from his nervousness of the political losses that the leftists are going to endure,,so,,, with that out of the way,,where's the titties at??

 

Didn't smcaaphd already explain about first names in the same post you quoted?

How did you miss that?

And I don't think it matters if the personal information is true or not. It would still be against the rules to even post personal information that were lies.