There really was no need to rub salt into that wound.

I bet it stings like fucking hell though!

 

You do realise that the address that Bill posted that got your sensibilities all in a flutter was of a public park. Now I do not know if that park is a member, but I doubt it, and if it is it should complain to the mods.

 

? ? ?

What wound?

 

​

 

Eljs had already removed that address from a previous post. And according to eljs billblondel344 posted more personal information in that quote which was subsequently re-quoted by me and another member.

So I don't think there's any doubt that there was billblondel344 posted more personal information. Which not only proved Baller16's accusation about some members posting his personal information but again begs the question of why billblondel344 is not getting banned for posting Baller16's personal information?

 

hey you dumb fuck old man I only posted what baller had posted on here trying to impress lisa ,, if you post your info on the internet it is public info maybe not here but what is posterd here gets on the www net like lisa's pictures are on the net she had them removed from her but too late they made it to other porn sites so if you post your info it is fair game asshole,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

yes baller we have a great amount of pity for your being a retarded ass hole and a douche bag life you live life must be hell live a life in which your mommy has to look after you because of you mental retardness,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

Does anybody want me to show you my little boobies?

 

Have you considered that this could be an indication that you were wrong on all of those other occasions when you disagreed with me?

I always speak words of rationality and truth. :neutral:

I too have had personal info spread about me here. Carrie J used my real first name in a number of posts and made personal threats. Was she banned for this? Nope.

With regard to Stumbler....

I have a very strong desire right now to tell him some personal info about myself in hopes that he'd "spill the beans" here in this forum and thus get his ass banned. His rants against the mods and boring ass novel-sized cut and paste political posts have gone waaaaaay beyond tiresome. ​

 

It may be in bad form to quote myself, but what I find interesting is that Stumbler (post sixty-eight now says, "eljs is more than threatening to ban me. She's actually trying to set me up for it. "

Would someone please explain to me how my asking the membership at large the above questions, qualifies as my threatening anyone or setting them up? You see, some of the more prolific posters here in GD like to quote rules. They like to claim that we practice favoritism. I asked the above questions in hopes of getting a response. After all, we want to be fair to everyone.

So if anyone can help me out here, I would really appreciate it.

 

You know what would have been really helpful is if the mods had banned baller for posting his personal information.

But since they didn't than you become the poster boy for our moderators discrimination and favoritism because they didn't ban you for re-quoting it.

Hell even I got threatened with being banned for what you actually posted.

You are the forum proof of that.

 

What's funny is that no where on any thread were you threatened. If you were, then you would quote the words, but you can't. It's amazing how your mind works.

It's also what's so very sad now.

 

Don't worry I'll answer that one for you you lying phony. Lots of your clique on this thread have agreed I could be banned for simply re-quoting someone who posted personal information.

And when asked about it you instead of simply answering the question instead evaded the question by asking forum members what they would do.

Most of them said a member should be banned.

Plus what you posted already counts as the warning doesn't it?

So if I do it again you can go ahead and ban me because you already warned me.

Some people might be buying your phony games but I'm not.

And didn't I already mention on this thread that if you had simply answered my questions and said I couldn't or wouldn't be banned I'd have had to retract and apologize for this thread.

But your dishonest evasiveness not to mention Jamie90's backtracking sure proves to me I was right all along.

 

Yeppers I sure was and your evasive and dishonest answer is all the proof I need of that.

 

What dishonest answer? Quote it.

And why haven't you offered an opinion on my questionsr? I am most interested to hear what you think.

 

Ok its right here:

I asked two really simple questions and instead of just answering them you turn to the members asking them what they would do (which many of them answered ban him incidentally) which is not only evasive but dishonest because they can't ban me and you can.

Now post your question again and I'll answer it.

But I want to trade you question for question.

Its not what the members think should be done that counts. Its what you as a moderator is going to do.

So if I do "re-quote" someone who posted personal information are you gong to ban me or not?

 

Your ass is still here, isn't it? I already edited you and x-o today for tossing around baller's real name in a requote. You didn't even realize what you were doing.

Does that answer your question? I'll bet you wish I had banned you so you could come back and make a huge fuss.

So Stumbler, did I do the right thing by not banning you? Or did I show favoritism?

 

Now we've got a fucking problem.

STOP FALSELY ACCUSING ME WHEN I'VE BEEN A VICTIM OF THIS SHIT SINCE 2007!

 

Meanwhile...

My actual first name was plastered on XNXX and I was personally threatened by Carrie J a couple years or so ago.

Jack was done about it.

It took an (alleged) beast porn pic IN A FUCKIN' PM and a made up out of the blue Rule years later to get her banned.

 

Meanwhile more than that has been happening to me repeatedly since 2007 and not so much as a warning to any of the people for that nor for the other rules they've broken or continue to break.