Now THIS is racist. You sound like some white guy wouldn't fuck you sweety!!!

 

Funny how you call me a racist, when the person I responded too, said all black women were savages. Typical.

So let me get this straight every white person here? It's cool for you guys to say racist things all ay long, and call a group of women savages, but when a black person fires back, we are THE BIG BAD RACIST?!?! SMDH, AT THIS FUCKING FOOLERY.

 

+1:rose:

Seriously, in today's society, what the hell difference does color make?

 

Zombie girls must do fairly well. They don't discriminate....

 

I already told you:

While cruising the internet in search of data I could not find a credible study that dealt directly with male preferences across racial lines. I wanted to know the percentage of white and black men who prefer Asian women, the percentage of Asian and black men who prefer white women, and the percentage of Asian and white men who prefer black women.

I suspect that data exists, but I could not find it. I did find something that surprises me. Asian men are less likely to be preferred across racial lines than white or black men. Because Asian men tend to make more money than white and black men, and because the preference of women for successful men is virtually universal I expected Asian men to be the most desirable.

 

I could go for any race but I'd say quite often the most gorgeous people I see are mixed race.

Integration. It's the future.

 

Tristero was being factious.

Tristero is so politically correct that he even accuses me of being a racist.

Me!

Have you ever heard of such a thing? :??)

 

So what, your thesis is that black women are widely unappealing? Apart maybe from the fact that black men are apparently more likely to marry outside of their race, I didn't see any specific data to support that.

 

Could be. I have no way of knowing 100%. However, it could also be due to the fact that city environments are breeding grounds for crime stemming from large overpopulation in tightly confined spaces.

It doesn't. It's just a difference in skin pigmentation based on melanin production.

Unfortunately, that doesn't stop people from discriminating or being prejudiced. There is speculation that it comes down to an evolutionary perspective of in-groups vs out-groups that persisted because of higher rates of survivability. Of course, that also didn't stop humans from fucking most anything in sight. Social conditioning would also have to play a large role, in my humble opinion.

 

If that was true we would expect Orientals in cities throughout the world to have to have high murder rates, and they do not.

Singapore, Hong Kong, and China have more economic inequality than the United States and lower murder rates.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publica...Kong&countryCode=hk&regionCode=eas&rank=13#hk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

 

It is rather ironic that you do exactly what you accuse your opponent of doing by cherry picking the facts which support your argument. You ignore the difference in black and white crime rates all over the world, even when they are at equal socio/economic levels, and instead find a small statistic about rural crime and infer from there that everything is as egalitarian as you imagine it (or desire it) to be.

As for your larger point (if one can call it that), and the point your comic seems to be pushing. Yes, it was grand old idea, and a grand old excuse. In order to justify the utter failing of certain races in the educational system, or in intelligent behavior as a whole, egalitarians harken back to Einstein's trite statement of judging gold fish in their ability to climb trees. The problem of course, is that you are making a wild and absolutely unfounded assumption. You are assuming, without reason, that the schools are the problem, the IQ tests are the problem, the world as a whole is a problem -- and not the black race. You are assuming, without evidence, that blacks are merely being tested and treated wrongly, and that they have some secret, super intelligence which just refuses to show up in normal testing, or, for that matter, in society itself.

Now, if blacks were building great civilizations, or had been a world leading race at some point in history, your theory might hold some water. If they were flying men to mars, but failing IQ tests, I might be inclined to say, "Yes, clearly they are very intelligent and we are failing to capture that intelligence in our testing." And I do do agree with the point that tests can only go so far in measuring the true intelligence of a person -- and often do not go nearly far enough. But it is not merely the tests telling us of a lack of intelligence. It is observable reality.

Their societies were uncivilized in the past, and they remain so in the present. Considering their place in history, and their rather unflattering place in the here and now, I cannot imagine where you imagine this secret intelligence to be. And I cannot imagine how you imagine it exists at all. Sometimes a thing is exactly as simple as it appears. Sometimes a race which behaves less intelligently on the whole, is simply less intelligent on the whole. Sometimes when a fish fails a test, it is not because he was asked to climb a tree, but because he was simply a stupid fish. We need not act baffled by small realities.

 

Neither did I. I did find a lot of white men who expressed their distaste for black women, but I wanted national and international surveys, rather than personal anecdotes.

 

Those are dangerous thoughts grimmtea.

We of the Federal Bureau of Political Correction have ways of making you change your thinking. :evil::twisted:

 

Now you're sounding like Joe. . .

 

oriental pussy is in demand be it malay, japanese, philipino, chinese. korean or evev thai dat is some tight horny pussy

 

All of which are known to have harsher prison treatment than the United States. I know that's one of your other points, and it's one I don't necessarily disagree with. If more prison experiences were akin to those of Tent City there would most likely be less crime due to a decline of repeat offenders.

I'd also be interested to see a comparison regarding how many violent crimes are committed from gang activity. No disrespect to any of the American gangs, but American gang work is much sloppier than that of the Yakuza or Chinese Triads.

I don't ignore the crime rates of different races, I just believe it boils down to more of a environmental difference than a biological one. DL believes it comes down to biological traits more so than environmental ones. This is why we debate back and forth. Each of us points to certain facts in order to bolster our arguments. I merely pointed to a piece of evidence of an article he posted to counteract his point as a means of diminishing his ethos. We've both used rhetorical strategies and we both know it.

I'm by no means egalitarian. I believe in equity, not equality. I know there are differences between people. I believe in individual differences, not racial ones (as far as how "intelligence" and behavior is dictated). Schools aren't the problem, but they are a large part of the problem. IQ tests aren't necessarily a marker of intelligence because intelligence cannot be singularly defined. I don't believe that black people are treated wrongly (as a whole/average) or that they have some secret intelligence. I do know that urban schools are generally not as educationally supported as suburban schools because of the lack of community backing. You make many statements about what I assume to be true, yet it seems to be you who is making the assumptions.

You're exactly right. The Zingh Empire wasn't great. Nubia and the Olmecs and Egypt were never great. Black people have never founded or productively contributed to any great/major civilization in history. That's why they were able to travel transcontinentally thousands of years before many European civilizations. That's why pyramids originated in Africa. That's why there was no intricate terracotta art, or use of iron found in West Africa from thousands of years ago. That's why there aren't may languages spoken in Africa, because black people clearly aren't intelligent enough to create their own language.

I will never look at an entire group of people and judge them equally. I will never look at an individual of a particular group and judge them based on the actions of whatever in group they belong to. Except for maybe Twilight fans.

Also, how would you define a black person? What makes a person black?

 

Civilization began independently over five thousand years ago in Egypt, and what is now Iraq. We know from mummies and Egyptian art that the Egyptians were Caucasians.

Nubia was a Negro nation directly to the south of Egypt. Its civilization was largely learned from Egypt, although it eventually developed an indigenous writing script that has not been deciphered. On one occasion Nubia conquered Egypt. That was the only time there was a Negro pharaonic dynasty in Egypt. It lasted about a hundred years.

The use of iron began in what is now Turkey over 3,000 years ago. From there it passed to Assyria in what is now northern Iraq. When the Assyrians conquered Egypt, the Egyptians learned it. The Nubians learned it from the Egyptians. The Bantu learned it from Nubia about 2,500 years ago. The Bantu used iron weapons to subdue most of sub Saharan Africa, although they never developed a system of writing, so we can only guess their development from the spread of Bantu languages and archaeology. They never developed a unified empire.

The Zingh Empire empire is as legendary and non existent in the archaeological record as the lost city of Atlantis.

In what is now Zimbabwe Bantu tribes built stone towns. The ruins of these towns survive. Nevertheless, they never developed their own systems of writing, mathematics, and astronomy, as did the Mayans in the New World.

 

What are caucasians? Can you define them for me?

And where did Assyrians and Egyptians come from? Certainly they must have spontaneously appeared and immediately segregated themselves from anyone they deemed to have darker skin. It's a good thing too, because there would have been no contribution at all, or even a civilization had any black people been around to hinder them.

While I don't recognize the Zingh Empire as a true empire, I do believe they were an association of trading tribes that largely worked together. There have been findings of reed ships technology that dates back quite a ways in West Africa.

So these people built stone structures, had weapons, art, a spoken language; yet because they didn't write they don't classify as a civilization?

 

I'm old - I lived through race riots and having the first black family move into the neighborhood. My father taught me that it doesn't matter what color you are on the outside, we all bleed the same color. We were raised to be colorblind and then raised our children the same way.

The thread started off with a racist tone and then was added to by the trolls. I guess she got the desired reaction, didn't she?