Obama protected dozens of Banksters that ought to be sitting in jail right now...

 

I'm holding my breath. I am still trying to figure out what bill won't get paid so I can buy the required insurance.

 

So that's your best your answer.

Someone once pissed in my sandbox so I'm going to piss in yours ?

How masculineness.

 

Cute.

I was calling your bluff. Don't waste our time calling one side bad when the other side is doing the same thing.

 

Unfortunately for you Obama wasn't the one who pissed in your sandbox and it certainly doesn't give you or the house Republicans justification for pissing in mine.

 

So explain to us what part of the 85 billion was yours?

 

Maybe the same part as yours Randy, who knows.

 

the $85 billion cut will be to the planed increas in spending it is not a cut in the spending now and most of it will never be felt as bad as that bonehead in the WH wants everyone to think it is

 

very nice BTW

 

all the typical demoncraps want to obfusticate and procrastinate on the problem and play the BLAME game.

Guess what Libtards; I have a memorey that lasts a BIT longer then the "Election" Mine goes alllll the way back to the year before; you remember THEN don't you? Yeahhh when you're Dictator in Chief became the FIRST presedent to LOSE the NATIONS triple A credit rateing( allll because of his Tax and Spend policys), and THEN he blamed his PREDECESSOR for HIS spending BILLS! THEN when the REPUBLICRATS tried to get the "drunken Sailor" spending spree of BOTH sides under control( oh yeah that was those "T.E.A Baggers" as you call them. T.E.A. meaning Taxed Enough Already!), the Whineing Crying Baby in Chief Screamed at the press and Sucked his Red Diaper Doper Baby thumb, and went on Vacation Rather then COMPROMISE!

Remember THAT word? guess what, COMPROMISE do'nt mean GETING YOU'RE OWN WAY ALL THE TIME!

DEMONCRAPS IDEA OF COMPROMISE IS WHEN THE REPUBLICANS BACK AWAY FROM THEY'RE PRINCEIPALS!!!

NOW STFU AND CHEW YOU'RE BITE OF THE SHIT SANDWICH!!! OR JOIN IN THE REVOLUTION!:wall:

 

heres a good plan for the ensurance of the futures of the american people
stop electing professional politicians
all the fuck any of them care about is the same old shit business as usual
fucking the people so that they can make more on their investments

the republicans tend to invest in oil
the democrats invest in gun makers

when gas goes up the rich win and the poor suffer
when some idiot screams ban guns the rich win and the poor suffer


welcome to the next 3rd world nation

if we keep on the same pace we are at now in less than 20 years we will be financialy and moraly bankrupted by the wills of those that benefit from the collapse
neither side is right and neither side is better
they both dont give a flying fuck about you equaly

 

Sequester does not slow down the First Lady....

 

Mrs. Oballah has the 'entitled right' to traipse across this nation supporting a well organized promotion.

Along with that, here we have the leftist media doing some more of that 'promoting the successes of the political leftist'.

FACT;


White House Stats on Childhood Obesity Decline Pre-Date ‘Let's Move’ - See more at:


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...te-lets-move_704845.html#sthash.ZxFENyvp.dpuf

 

Uh uh!
Not letting you get away with this. Roosevelt's practices extended the depression right up to WWII; He came into office on a platform of "we need to fix this and we need to work together to do it". He created the CCC, Social Security, Unemployment benefits and what we now know as welfare. And the economy continued to suck right up until late 1940-early 1941. What got the economy unstuck was WWII; our entire manufacturing base turned to full speed war production. And to pay for it he ran tax rates through the roof for the part of American business that was the most productive.

............you know, this sounds an awful lot like Obama's run; take office when the economy is tanked, push a lot of social welfare programs through, extend the poor economy so people will become dependent on big government and tax the shit out of the most successful............

 

Next....obama will confiscate all the gold...like FDR did....

 

WOWW,,,,that'll leave a mark........

 

Look who's playing the partisan blame game now. Maybe you can drop the whole sanctimonious routine about it, since you do the exact same thing yourself.

Obama was stupid to propose the sequester--he failed to anticipate how inflexible the opposition would be in the budget negotiations. Back in the summer of 2011, he was prepared to give them a sweetheart deal, with a ten to one ratio of spending cuts to revenue increases (including cuts to Social Security and Medicare). I suspect Boehner and McConnell would have liked to have taken that deal in retrospect, but the Tea Party fanatics wouldn't allow it. The whole idea of making a deal with Obama is abhorrent to them on principle, now matter how much he offers them.

Since then, they lost an election and the voters have indicated a preference for Obama's more balanced approach, but Republicans are still unwilling to deal, particularly now that he's in a better bargaining position. Senate Democrats attempted to pass their own alternative to the sequester, but it got held up on another GOP filibuster. More Beltway dysfunction.

 

Incorrect. Projected tax increases on business for unemployment alone will force employers to defer hiring new employees for several years. Besides slowing growth and extending the depression, it will slow innovation and discourage manufacturing from bringing jobs back to the US.

It is also incorrect to blame Republicans for this mess; Your president got what he wanted with the sequester idea he cooked up; he bragged about it just before the election. Remember?

And I've seen two Republican backed compromise bills come out of the House, both shot down by Dummycrats. I have yet to see any compromise offer of any kind from Obama. What I have seen is his road show highlighting how huge an impact $85 Billion in cuts will have on "the middle class". The reality is, most of the impact is avoidable but the Obama and his cronies will make sure the impact is maximized to prove a point. How does that make the Publicans the disrupters?

 

Those were very popular government programs.

-------

A Gallup poll of 18 April 1936 asked "Are you in favor of the CCC camps?"; 82% of respondents said yes, including 92% of Democrats and 67% of Republicans.[31]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_Conservation_Corps

-------

The basic reforms of the New Deal still are popular. This is what President Eisenhower wrote about these reforms in a letter to his brother: "Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man from other areas.5 Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x350935

Social Security is still popular. There is little popular support for cutting it, and much support for raising taxes on the well to do.

http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sclien...8975,d.dmQ&fp=95c9c19312d4e19&biw=600&bih=518

 

Obama blames Republicans for the sequester.

Inconvenient fact: House Republicans voted against it!

Last year, Republicans supported a sequester scheduled for 1/1/2013, in tandem with tax code changes, and a 'grand bargain' deal on entitlements.

The fiscal cliff deal repealed the 1/1 sequester, raised taxes, rejected entitlement reform, and scheduled a new and different sequester for 3/1.

Wholly different spending levels, a new start date, different terms.

House Republicans voted 151-87 against the fiscal cliff deal, including the 3/1 sequester.

This was Obama's sequester, supported by a majority of House Democrats and opposed by a majority of House Republicans.