You are expressing hatred for me, but I am responding politely to your invective.

 

no i am expressing a disdain or ire for your twisted beliefs but since i do not know you personaly i have no right or reason to hate you
i can disagree with your oppinnions and even dislike your point of view but until i know you as an individual i cannot hate you

 

Of what am I ignorant?

The night the verdict came down I attended a social gathering where I was one of the few whites. Many of the blacks knew me and like me.

You keep complaining of my hate. Nevertheless, it is you who have initiated this exchange by expressing hate for me simply because of opinions I amply substantiate.

The issue is not me. The issue is black crime. That is a real problem. I don't cause it.

 

More like expressing pity for you, because your blinkered views stop you seeing and understanding the root causes of continued racism in society.

 

I will humor you. What are "the root causes of continued racism in society?"

What don't I see and understand?

 

This highlighted comment of yours below. Crime is crime regardless of colour, yet you classify crime by colour and then try to maintain that ONLY violent and mindless crime is committed by Blacks because they are not intelligent enough to do anything else.

 

Fallacy: Straw Man

Crime is very low in countries where nearly everyone is white or Oriental.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

That is why it is meaningful to discuss black crime.

The fact that blacks have a high crime everywhere they live has legitimate policy implications. It ought to be discussed when law enforcement is discussed. It ought to be discussed when immigration policy is discussed.

I have never said "that ONLY violent and mindless crime is committed by Blacks." By maintaining that I do you commit the straw man fallacy.

----------

The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following pattern:

Person A has position X.
Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X).
Person B attacks position Y.
Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because attacking a distorted version of a position simply does not constitute an attack on the position itself. One might as well expect an attack on a poor drawing of a person to hurt the person.
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html

 

No, DL, you don't disdain all humans, just the black ones.

I have responded to your racist threads with facts and logic, hoping to engage you in meaningful dialog that will change your racist views.

You have declined, but I am ever the optimist;

So; explain how the Japanese, who are more intelligent than whites according to you, became butchers for a decade. Explain how the Germans, how are more intelligent than whites according to you, became genocidal butchers for a decade.

Explain the Tuskagee Airmen.

 

BORING: Can't you think of anything else.
You do realise that in an organised debate, repeating yourself will get you disqualified.

Now debate this topic WITHOUT your racial bias and prejudice.

YOU made a thread requesting a discussion on racial issues, YET you CANNOT be unbiased or unprejudiced in your views.
CRIME is CRIME regardless of the colour.

You are making the barriers, that need to be broken down before any meaningful action can be taken, and then you complain about lack of action taken.

 

I keep repeating truths. I am biased in favor of the truth.

Blacks are characterized by low intelligence and high rates of crime and illegitimacy. Those are significant truths. You do not want them discussed. In the United States we have not been discussing them publicly for two generations. The time has come to discuss them publicly, frequently, and safely.

Now I am not saying that all blacks are stupid. However, there is a well understood genetic phenomenon called "reversion to average." Exceptional characteristics of any sort are caused by the coming together of rare and recessive genes.

Because brilliant blacks are more exceptional than brilliant whites the children of brilliant blacks usually revert to a lower level than the children of brilliant whites. It is for this reason that even when blacks are raised in affluent homes by well educated parents, and even when they attend high performance schools they tend to lag behind whites and Orientals.

 

If you feel that it is time for the issues to be discussed, then contact the relevant people.

You ONLY repeat your conclusions, based on out-of-date statistics, and you try to make people believe that this is the truth.

You make sweeping generalisations about people, possibly based on personal experiences, but when these generalisations are shown to be false you dismiss them as exceptions.
This is why no-one will entertain you in a debate on racial problems, your views are clouded regardless of how many times you deny this fact.

========================================================

Off topic but relevant to your comments regarding Jews. There is a poster in the sexuality section who has the viewpoint to the idea that; if you are circumcised you CANNOT be called a real man, because you are incomplete and imperfect.
Considering that you have stated that the Jews are very intelligent, and have a low crime rate, would you consider a circumcised man not to be a 'real man'

 

Right here are SAT scores compiled by the U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. They are divided by race, and go from 1986-87 to 2010-11.

http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171

How are they out of date?

 

In a previous comment I acknowledged that there are exceptionally intelligent blacks. I also said that they tend to have less intelligent children than equally intelligent whites. I explained that by a well understood genetic phenomenon.

 

No.

 

Yet you have stated that exceptionally intelligent white parents stand a good chance of have exceptionally intelligent children.
This smacks of of a racist attitude, as in your head ONLY exceptionally intelligent whites can have exceptionally intelligent children, and any black children have to be less intelligent than their parents.

 

Strange how the table shows no real gap developing between whites and blacks, and maybe a small decrease can be detected.

 

During the school year 1986-87 the gap in reading was 96. During the school year 2010-11 the gap was 100.

During the school year 1986-87 the gap in mathematics was 103. During the school year 2010-11 the gap was 108.

http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171

 

Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic

How many times do I have to remind you that I do not mind being called a racist?

I never said that "any black children have to be less intelligent than their parents." What I did say was that the children of brilliant black parents are likely to be less intelligent than the children of brilliant white parents.

If you have trouble understanding the way I explain it, here is another explanation:

IQ Scores of Blacks and Whites Regress toward the Averages of Their Race. Parents pass on only some exceptional genes to offspring so parents with very high IQs tend to have more average children. Black and White children with parents of IQ 115 move to different averages--Blacks toward 85 and Whites to 100.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx#id_d90f8fc5-74e1-46ab-bd03-eafd0730133a

 

Yet in the school year 1996-97 the gap in reading was 92, also during the school year 1996-97 the gap in mathematics was 103.

You do miss out a lot of information in your conclusions, talk about cherry-picking facts that agree with your views.
In fact the ONLY trend of any value that is showing in these figures is in writing. Where the figures for both white and black students is falling.

Admittedly the black figure is falling a little faster than the white, but nevertheless BOTH sets of figures are below the point at which they started.