On 23 July 2013 David Cameron the so called unrecognised notorious prime minister in London, UK had turned the country into a communist state similar to North Korea, Russia and China by blocking the access of adult material to adults. Cameron has threatened UK ISP's to use their 'greatest brain' to not only block child abuse images which we all agree it should be blocked but he has also made the biggest mistake to block all other adult material automatically by default or he has threatened the nation to use legislative power into force.

Although adults can have porn sites unblocked, possessing porn or looking at it could mean the government is spying on anyone or everyone as they are already doing. It will be up to the judgement and discretion of the police to suspect who is a criminal. What this means is anyone who looks at adult material could become a peadophile not because one is looking at child porn which will no longer exist but just for looking at normal adult porn.

Cameron has taken the country back into the dark ages where computers did not exist but porn or adult material existing in private video shops and top shelf magazines. It seems the UK has now gone back into the pre-IT revolution where perhaps only soft porn or no porn could exist on the internet as when the internet was first evolving. If adult material is wiped off the net it could be back to the video shop and top shelf magazines. It must be noted even in the dark ages where Cameron was a school boy he used to look at porn himself using top-shelf magazines and VHS video while jerking off under the blanket to a penthouse magazine. However, he has now become too smug for the rest of the population to enjoy the same.

The argument is why just ban porn or adult material on computers but why not deal with the bigger picture like ban women wearing short skirts (with thongs underneath), see thru tops and low-cut tops. Sexual crime will not stop unless these things are also dealt with for example, no matter what these extemeist womens rights groups say but we will always know that women who walk around in short skirts are asking for it - asking to stir the passion of men and to arouse them sexually, rapidly and hard. In fact it is not even normal women who are the problem but the feminist groups.

So, what will it be next ? unless Cameron bans strip clubs, night-clubs, lap-dancing shows and women dressing very 'nicely' then, this will be just a drop in the ocean. Rape and prostiution will sky rocket. So, we can see Cameron banning prositutes as well, in this case we might as well all move into Dubai where exposing your body or showing affection in some islamic state where all adult material is banned and you have to dress without exposing any of your flesh is a crime.

Porn and prostitution are soothers, a ban in them will also see the rise of stalkers which will be followed by rape. But there is one thing cameron has failed to recognise is to make no mistake there will always be a way but for now Cameron has simply taken away a UK citizen's liberty and human rights - the human rights of free will, free thinking, the freedom to look. Cameron has put himself into a highly abusive postion for which he doesnt know but someone could be using a powerful telescope to spy on his wife while she takes her clothes.

It is the womens rights groups and/or feminists who prompted the move to block all adult material by default; with the addition Keith Vaz a fearful, trembling rag puppet being used by these groups to take it analy from senior ministers to ban porn - why ? the reason they think porn makes men rapist is because they have no knowldege of the fact that women indirectly invite men to fuck them using their dress sense. Womens rights groups or feminists are extremely scared of their own bodies because their own bodies look ugly. This move Cameron made will also see a rise in prositutes, brothels and massage parlours and men frequently visiting as even did Cameron before he was minister, but now the notorious cameron has just snatched away the peoples freedom rights. One thing to note is many of the womens rights individuals were once in a bad situation for example, they were whores and sluts and when they had a very bad experience they became part of a womens rights groups.

In the UK there already does not exist the freedom to speech because if you say the wrong thing you could get in to trouble but now cameron has closed the gap and turned UK into a commuinist state. There is so much porn on youtube and other social media it is thought cameron will eventually get to ban all those sites now.

 

I'm glad I don't live in the UK.

 

Already covered on the forum

https://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.php?t=357874

 

Is this your opinion, or have you lifted it? I would seriously take issue with this, for example

Are you serious???

 

And before that here

https://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.php?t=357601

 

I stand corrected, Dave - I knew there was more than one thread. In any case, it's good to discuss these things - while we still can.

 

No, I am not saying these things should be done but it looks like this how things might go, porn on the internet is not the root cause of the problem. Even if it was eradicated sexual crime would still prevail. The meaning is banning porn on the internet is not the answer nor is the banning of the way women dress but men who have 'issues' are what should be dealt with.

 

who knows, other dogs may follow the lead

 

There is a point to 'while we still can' ...., our freedom has been snatched away, even though adult material can be unblocked but the government is moving swiftly to slowly move us into the dark ages, I bet one day coming very soon this site may only display a very limited of what we can see.

Its good to discuss these things but sitting ere looking at this site won't do us much good, we also need to make a shout, aloud, make some noise about this.

They have the technology they can just ban all the horrible child stuff or is Cameron trying to turn us all into male nuns ? If you look at the big picture far away from here, OMG!, I hope not, I hope this is not turning into some Islamic state like Dubai, so yeh, we need to start making noise about this and stop this from happening

 

In that case (post 7) can I also bring up this from your post

Women are constantly being judged by their appearance. I'm sure you've read recently how sportswomen are often not judged by their sporting achievements, but by their looks. http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/tv-radio/bbc-presenter-john-inverdale-comes-2055188

I'm sure if you cared to read/listen to feminist groups, you would find that they are very aware of how the way women dress can 'invite' men to act on their urges. And that's why they don't dress provocatively themselves - or as you put it, are 'extremely scared of their own bodies'.

Equally, although porn does provide an outlet for sexual frustration, it also creates false expectations for the sexually inexperienced. You might like to read my thread on 'real sex' - link in my signature.

 

Another thing that has happened lately, some co-op corporation is banning top-shelve front page mags with beautiful women on the cover, making it less appealing. These mags are on the top shelves which include places like WHSmith and high street newsagent, I have never seen any children or many adults even look up there. What is the world coming to ? The sport is banned and soon will be the page-3 in The Sun

These people are exaggerating things beyond belief for no reason, by the looks of it women could be donning a burka soon and if they are successful at apply the ban we could be seeing underground sex such as pretty women dressed in a burka but naked underneath - in some parts of the world I have seen women making attraction in the street in this manner.

 

Oh Yeah! I walk around asking for it all the time, and never get any takers.
They did tell me I could work at the Brothel in Pahrump.

 

this is the 3rd thread on this matter

 

Obviously women that walk around half naked are not simply asking for it. Anybody that suggests otherwise is simply wrong. However, some men may interpret their intentions wrongly. Not all instances of rape are cases of women being dragged into alleyways. More often, two people are engaging in consensual sexual behaviour, then a man may take something beyond being consensual without realising it. Out of fear the woman may be paralysed to stop what is happening. This is clearly devastating for the woman, and I'm not comparing the level of trauma between the two, but it can also be horrifying for the man to find out what he has done. I'm in no way blaming the woman in this scenario, the man is completely at fault. However, women are often putting themselves in vulnerable positions, with complete strangers, and sending signals which some men will misinterpret.

It is also true that if women walk around alone late at night drunk they are making themselves more vulnerable. It is in no way their fault for whatever may happen to them, but in the interest of safety, it isn't something they should do if they want to minimize the likelihood of them becoming a victim.

If I was a woman there would be no way I would date a stranger, no way I'd walk around half naked, and there would be no way I'd be walking around alone at night.

 

Agreed, Dave, but there are many young women who do just that. As a student, I used to walk home alone from the centre of Manchester, at the time the Yorkshire Ripper was active. I wasn't one to dress provocatively and avoided certain areas. I liked to think that I walked in a way that suggested I wasn't an easy target, and luckily nothing ever happened to me. My eldest son was always concerned that his ex would often walk home alone late at night after drinking heavily - though God help anyone who might have tried anything on, she was a tough cookie. He once found a girl on the back streets that had been raped, and helped her to the police station. There is a tipping point at which young women can get themselves into very dangerous situations.

I'd would be very concerned if I had daughters - the culture of alcohol abuse and the way young women dress is indeed extremely alarming. I'm also noticing a trend of young men who have very little regard for women of any age. In my opinion, porn objectifies both sexes, and so does a lot of popular culture that promotes certain stereotypes - the clingy girlfriend, the 'player' and so on.

What we need to remember is that we are individuals, people with feelings and desires and needs. We need to respect others of all ages and all walks of life.

 

lol, I don't think this applies to senior citizens, are you a madam by any chance or experience ? :razz:

 

Women who walk around half naked are not simply asking for it is true but are asking for stirring the passion of men. It doesn't take a genius to see a woman in a sexy outfit only for all the men to gawk at them - young and old, I think the street gets turned into a cat walk some times even if its only one woman. Some men may become dogs with a tongue hanging out and following a lead and then jump on them...:razz:

 

The Yorkshire or jack the ripper was something else, he was monster who butchered people. He didn't look at porno but he hated it and all the women who were prostitutes, I don't know what his problem was but it arouse from a bad experience.

 

And not one mention of the guy who sits in the driving seat at the White House :laughing:

Ahh Dave, I hate disagreeing with you, because I don't want to get into a debate with an intellectual, but I am going to have to disagree with this post.

Rape is never the fault of the victim. There are many, many reasons why a victim is selected. You started the list with the way women dress, dating strangers, and walking alone at night. However, here are just a few more reasons why a woman (I'm using the female gender to make my point as your post relates more specifically to female victims):

1. Wearing your hair in a pony tail (easy to grab and so subdue the victim)
2. Making eye contact
3. Talking to the rapist; this could be as little as saying thanks for holding a door open to addressing them in a business environment
4. NOT talking to the rapist, sometimes even when addressed directly - how very rude!
5. Wearing a knee length skirt or dress
6. Wearing heels
7 Wearing flats
8 Wearing trousers
9 Having blonde hair
10 Having brown hair - or even no hair

The list is endless. Rape happens because the rapist wants it to happen, not because of the way the victim dresses, acts, or where they walk, park or do their shopping.

No, no, no! If a male can't control his sexual urges, it's no fault of the victim. It doesn't matter if the victim is drunk, high or sober, a rapist will always have what they consider as a valid reason why the victim was 'asking for it'.

 

really ? I thought it was only about dogs with passion and desire for attractiveness but reading this list I don't understand what goes through a rapists mind. The list of reasons why people rape sound tasteless

why would someone find a woman attractive and rape her if she was wearing a knee length skirt ? only if he was a foreign national who never seen a woman before and that goes for the other items as well