Damn! You are one hateful sonofabitch.

 

...said one of the most hateful cunts on the board.

 

I can honestly say there is not a human on this earth I hate (no withstanding some I intensely dislike). I'll tell you what though, if you want a little contest here how about we take all of your posts and mine and see who is most hateful. A percent would eliminate the difference in total post count. Wanna play, hater?

 

Like this one?

 

And I notice you never did have the balls to reply to this one. Guilty, per chance?

https://forum.xnxx.com/showthread.p...th-this-site&p=6409761&viewfull=1#post6409761

 

And has ANYBODY ever come out and said, "Wow, you really ARE a kindly, older gent"? I've seen many people question it. I've never seen anyone say they agree with it.

 

You are obviously trying but at the same time failing miserably at the task. You haven't posted anything reflecting the manifest hatred you post every day always directed to the President. Anotheruser1 is another loaded with hatred but unlike you he is an equal opportunity hater. He hated Democrats and Republicans and all government. No Amigo, you win by far on just top posts alone...Hate eats the hater. I have survived over 77 years of life by not hating. Enjoy.....PS Pics or videos of homosexual acts are disgusting to me but I do not hate the homosexual.

 

So, you equate posting political cartoons drawn by someone else as "hatred" (which started your little snit). Who is the delusional one here?


So, you started this little pissing contest. Show your evidence of "manifest hatred". Or STFU!

 

The best evidence is your history here. On your own and with no one looking over your shoulder, look over your posting history. Cartoons reflecting hatred, and in most cases racism, are YOUR hatred when YOU post them.

 

Translation: You're so full of shit, your neighbors think they live next to a sewage treatment plant.

 

OK...clearly an admission of defeat on your part. I'm off to dinner so you can post unmolested.

 

Right. The "admission of defeat" always comes in the form of someone accepting the challenge and posting evidence, while the one who issues the challenge posts nothing except for "The best evidence is your history here." That might fool yer grandkids, pappy. It doesn't fly around here.

 

Like they say, "If you're gonna be hung for being a horse thief, you might as well steal the horse!"

 

Wow! Those UNIONS must be some real "hateful, sons of bitches", eh? Hateful, hateful, HATEFUL! And those hateful Democrats criticizing your Lord Overbama! Off with their heads!



http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/21/unions-slam-obama-over-keystone-xl-delay/

Unions slam Obama over Keystone XL delay

While environmentalists might be pleased with the Obama administration’s decision to further delay approval of the Keystone XL pipeline until after the elections, unions are not.

“This is once again politics at its worst,” said Terry O’Sullivan, general president of the Laborers’ International Union of North America. “In another gutless move, the administration is delaying a finding on whether the pipeline is in the national interest based on months-old litigation in Nebraska regarding a state level challenge to a state process — and which has nothing to with the national interest.”

Labor unions have generally supported building the Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring oil from Canada to refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. Supporters argue the project would create thousands of jobs — jobs unions sorely need.

In late February, Obama promised a decision on Keystone “in a couple months” and the State Department’s final review of the project was supposed to end in May. But the Obama administration announced another indefinite delay last week based on a North Dakota court decision slightly altering the pipeline’s route. The announcement angered pipeline supporters.

“It’s not the oil that’s dirty, it’s the politics,” O’Sullivan said. “Once again, the administration is making a political calculation instead of doing what is right for the country. This certainly is no example of profiles in courage. It’s clear the administration needs to grow a set of antlers, or perhaps take a lesson from Popeye and eat some spinach.”

The delay has also been seen as a way to appease billionaire liberal donor Tom Steyer, who has promised to raise $100 million to make global warming a top issue in the 2014 elections. Steyer is a former hedge fund manager and major Obama donor. He has bankrolled much of the Keystone XL opposition and was a major force for campaign cash in the 2013 election season.

“This is rotten eggs for TransCanada and good news on Good Friday for those who oppose Keystone as not being in our nation’s best interest,” Steyer said in a statement on Friday. “The State Department has the opportunity to address the inherent flaws in its past work by boiling this down to the two issues that impact our national interest.”

Energy-state Democrats have been pushing the Obama administration to approve the pipeline, but the administration has done little to fast-track the process. Keystone has been seen as a political tool for the Obama administration — approval would hurt their environmental fundraising base, but help Democrats in oil and gas states.

Indecision on the pipeline will keep energy state Democrats vulnerable to challengers come November. Democratic Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Mark Pryor of Arkansas, Mark Begich of Alaska, Kay Hagan of North Carolina and Mark Warner of Virginia all face tough re-elections this fall and have pushed the Obama administration to approve Keystone, reports The Wall Street Journal.

Landrieu has been aggressively pushing energy security issues, including Keystone’s approval, in the run-up to the fall elections. She recently came to chair the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, where she has continued to push energy issues.

With Keystone’s fate still in limbo, Landrieu could be vulnerable on the issue despite her support for oil and gas. The Washington Free Beacon notes that Republicans are using Keystone’s delay to show that Landrieu has been ineffective in Congress.

“Landrieu has been telling anyone who will listen how influential she is after being named chairman of the energy committee, but it turns out that Landrieu isn’t influential at all,” the National Republican Senatorial Committee said in a statement statement on Monday.

“This is another low blow to the working men and women of our country for whom the Keystone XL Pipeline is a lifeline to good jobs and energy security,” O’Sullivan said.

 

Wonder if the left and the Unions are finally turning en mass upon Pres Obama and the leftist-extremists.

 

Wonder if they'll be described as hateful, sons of bitches.

 

Nope, not unless they support a Conservative outright for President.

 

Or post political cartoons making fun of the messiah, Lord Overbama.

 

http://nypost.com/2014/04/20/obama-shuts-down-debate/

Obama shuts down debate

When President Obama trumpeted the 8 million figure representing people who had signed up for ObamaCare, he didn’t just declare it a victory. He declared the debate over — and told Republicans “it’s well time to move on.”

Now, we understand the eagerness of politicians to declare debates over. It’s certainly easier than defending ObamaCare’s broken promises, or even providing the breakdowns behind that 8 million top-line number that would let us measure if the program is getting the sign-ups it needs.

Increasingly, however, it seems that the “shut up and move on” trope has become the go-to response of liberals on a number of serious topics they’d rather not have to discuss in open debate.

Climate change? We’re told there’s 100 percent agreement among scientists that the climate is changing, human activity is the cause and America should upend its economy to stop it from happening.

Abortion? Roe v. Wade is “settled law,” so anyone who believes the Supreme Court may have decided the case incorrectly must be unfit for office.
Remember, these are the same folks who pride themselves on openness, tolerance and, as the president put it in his inaugural, “restoring science to its rightful place.” So how is it that if you disagree with them — or ask for objective measures behind their claims — instead of having your objections answered you find yourself called a denier, a racist or guilty of a war on women?

If President Obama were really confident the debate about ObamaCare is over, he’d be giving us the hard evidence instead of telling us we shouldn’t be asking for it.