it means the same fuing thing it did during the cold war a ground burst picks up dirt and other debrie carries it up it FALLS back to the ground it is then radioavtive " FALLOUT"
as i said before use an FAE no fallout next most powerful weapon to a nuke without the fallout

 

Good old stumbler. :excited:

 

It tickles me to no end that you claim to know the UCMJ inside and out, but refer to the proceeding as a court "marshal". Classic! :laughing:

 

Obama trades one deserter for FIVE war criminals. Who got the better end of this deal? Obama? Or the terrorists?

The terrorists have learned what to do to get Obama to cave and get more of their fellow terrorists released. Just kidnap another serviceman.

Obama is a dumbass and a joke.

I myself call that evil and dumb motherfucker a snake. Is that "derogatory in a racial way," asswipe?

 

Should the Pres have done something? Yes. What he did; NO. He SHOULD have followed LAW and PROCEDURE that REQUIRED him to give notice TO THE CONGRESS so they could hold DEBATE and EXAMINATION of the "POW'S" in question (btw, under the Geneva conventions of War; they do NOT count as POW'S as they were NOT a UNIFORMED branch of Armed Force of a Signatory Nation)...

Once more HRH Barry the First decides to "Invent" Law and Procedures INSTEAD of FOLLOWING THEM!

We'll undoubtedly hear MORE on THAT matter in the Future....

Thank you Mr.Presdent for putting an even BIGGER bullseye on our TROOPS!

 

since as of yet there is no actual evidence that the person in question was in fact a traitor or a deserter most reactions are a bit premature
and due to the fact that the congress has been aware of the negotiations for well over 3 years the 30day bullshit is null and void
yes congress was aware that there were attempts in play at a release pact and they did not use that time to discuss the possibilities

but as to the 5 that were released
none of the 5 could have been tried due to a complete lack of evidence yet it was determined that their release was "a potential detriment to the nations security overseas"

first things first
we have no reason to be in the middle east to begin with
that was a fight that was began under false pretenses and failed intelligence
it was in all actuality a war for oil and water
that was not our fight
the people nor governments of afghanastan or iraq ever attacked the US on US soil
it was a fallacy that was used to take the oil only

 

All nukes, at least those used by major nuclear powers (the US, Russia, UK, France, China, and likely Israel), use air bursts in order to maximise damage, from which there is zero fallout.

 

Fallout is the radioactive dust and dirt that "falls out" out of the sky a few hours after a nuclear explosion. You only get fallout when the explosion is close enough to the ground to suck up all the dust and small debris, where it becomes irradiated. Conventional nukes, those used by the 5 major nuclear powers, detonate their nuclear weapons at various altitudes depending on the size of the weapon in order to maximise damage. In these explosions, most of what is irradiated is air, and unlike heavy dust and debris, air floats, particularly warm air. Therefore it doesn't reach the ground for months, by which time it has spread out of considerable distances and the energy from radiation has mostly gone. What this means is there is no fallout.

 

dave you have a seriously fucked up definition of fallout
because it is any lasting spreadable effects of a nuclear blast or release
if the missile detonates above ground, on the ground, or beneath ground there will be a release of radioactive materials that will be typically be carried by the winds and the particulate will eventually fall to the earths surface
its kind of like taking a bunch of feathers and tossing them into the air on a windy day
they float and fly for a while but eventually they fall

 

I should point out that nuclear fallout is a completely different concept to nuclear winter. Many people use these terms interchangeably despite them having totally different meanings.

Nuclear winter has nothing at all to do with radiation. And everything to do with smoke and soot caused by widespread fires, which pollutes the atmosphere enough to block out the sun and cause climatic effects.

 

and you have no clue as to what a true nuclear winter is either
it would be a case where the dust or debris due to a nuclear blast created a situation by any means that blocked sunlight for an extended period of time that would contribute to the lowering of temperatures and inability of living beings to use the suns light to effectively survive
most common would be the failure beginning with plant life which would tax a food supply for meats and eventually humans would follow

 

I have the exact definition. You may have had 150 jobs and be an expert in 250 fields. But when it comes to nuclear weapons that's my thing. Nuclear fallout from nuclear weapons refers to irradiated dust and debris, which "falls out" of the sky at some point later in time. Fission fragments, only make up a tiny percentage of the energy of thermonuclear weapons, and they are unlikely to harm anyone from an air burst. This changes a lot when compared with small nuclear devices detonated at ground level.

 

so then you are admitting that you said the exact same shit i did just in different words
because i did say that it was the shit that the warhead pushed into the air just in better words

 

No. You are confusing an asteroid impact with nuclear winter.

 

Read the first post I made which you commented on. Tell what is incorrect. Then look up the definitions of the terms I used.

 

how ignorant does one need to be to dismiss a nuclear warhead as an asteroid in any reality?


you

All nukes, at least those used by major nuclear powers (the US, Russia, UK, France, China, and likely Israel), use air bursts in order to maximise damage, from which there is zero fallout.

Fallout is the radioactive dust and dirt that "falls out" out of the sky a few hours after a nuclear explosion. You only get fallout when the explosion is close enough to the ground to suck up all the dust and small debris, where it becomes irradiated. Conventional nukes, those used by the 5 major nuclear powers, detonate their nuclear weapons at various altitudes depending on the size of the weapon in order to maximise damage. In these explosions, most of what is irradiated is air, and unlike heavy dust and debris, air floats, particularly warm air. Therefore it doesn't reach the ground for months, by which time it has spread out of considerable distances and the energy from radiation has mostly gone. What this means is there is no fallout.


me
dave you have a seriously fucked up definition of fallout
because it is any lasting spreadable effects of a nuclear blast or release
if the missile detonates above ground, on the ground, or beneath ground there will be a release of radioactive materials that will be typically be carried by the winds and the particulate will eventually fall to the earths surface
its kind of like taking a bunch of feathers and tossing them into the air on a windy day
they float and fly for a while but eventually they fall


you
I should point out that nuclear fallout is a completely different concept to nuclear winter. Many people use these terms interchangeably despite them having totally different meanings.

Nuclear winter has nothing at all to do with radiation. And everything to do with smoke and soot caused by widespread fires, which pollutes the atmosphere enough to block out the sun and cause climatic effects.


me
and you have no clue as to what a true nuclear winter is either
it would be a case where the dust or debris due to a nuclear blast created a situation by any means that blocked sunlight for an extended period of time that would contribute to the lowering of temperatures and inability of living beings to use the suns light to effectively survive
most common would be the failure beginning with plant life which would tax a food supply for meats and eventually humans would follow

 

I have no idea why this surprises anyone that has an ounce of sense, this is who Obama is.

Obama has no intentions of keeping this country strong, independent or respected, he is a fucking yo-yo joke.

Obama is as anti-American as they come, thus Obama is NOT AN AMERICAN.

 

THE STATEMENTS AT ISSUE:

“By executing this transfer, the President clearly violated laws which require him to notify Congress 30 days before any transfer of terrorists from Guantanamo Bay and to explain how the threat posed by such terrorists has been substantially mitigated. Our joy at Sergeant Bergdahl’s release is tempered by the fact that President Obama chose to ignore the laws, not to mention sound policy, to achieve it.”

– Joint statement on May 31 by Representative Howard P. McKeon, California Republican, who is chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Senator James Imhofe, Oklahoma Republican, who is the senior GOP member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“Due to a near-term opportunity to save Sergeant Bergdahl’s life, we moved as quickly as possible. The administration determined that given these unique and exigent circumstances, such a transfer should go forward notwithstanding the notice [to Congress] requirement.”

– Quotation in a Washington Post article on June 1, attributed to an unidentified “senior Obama Administration official.” The article also said that the official had “acknowledged that the law was not followed.”



and yes we can delve deeper into the federalist papers or even the prize cases from the civil war era if need be
shit since day 1 congress has done everything humanly possible to eliminate every possibility for anyone to do anything
and since 9-11-2011 they have reduced all power of the oval office
this was a decision made by a bi-partisain panel so get the fuck over it

 

1st..he IS still a soldier and we DON'T leave our men (and women) behind.

2nd..if these 5 were so bad.....why didn't BUSH charge them with crimes 12 years ago when we captured them. Why weren't they tried for those charges? Just how bad were they if we never charged them with a crime?

3rd Yes, he's a deserter. He should be medically stabilized n Germany and then assigned a home base in the US until charges are brought against him. He SHOULD NOT go home. If his parents want to visit him UNTIL charges are brought that's fine.

I don't think the US government thought this out nor did they expect the backlash.

And to call ANY man a chimpanzee shows everyone what a fucking idiot you are. You can not be taken seriously any IN conversation. And we can also tell you never had the balls to serve so SHUT THE FUCK UP!
(yes..I served 9 years and my wife served 4)