by posting where the cop lives it will lead to more hate and discontent that in turn sells more "papers" and thats all the MSM cares
the fact that a black man is killed by a cop just makes it better.
they could care less about the young black MAN.

as i see it at 18 he is no longer a kid but a MAN if you can vote at 18 or join the armed services at 18 that IMHO makes you a man not a kid!

 

Like you say though it is more dramatic to call him a kid, which escalates everything... Money and the shit people do for it......

 

Of all the shit stolen by looters no footwear used for working, such as steel toed boots, have been stolen. As a matter of fact nothing used in the average job has been stolen but everything else has been cleaned out.

 

I noticed the identity of the person shot during the riots is not being released.
Wonder why that is?
Usually the news media would be right there giving out his info.
Something smells fishy. All they will say is he was not shot by the police.
That only leaves the protestors. Why would one of them shoot one of their own?
Could it be he is a business owner?

 

It was probably a white person, they don't give a shit about a white person. There were many whites in pictures of the protesting, if a nigger killed a white that doesn't matter and may tarnish the perfect angel picture the government / media is painting of the black victim. Just goes to show racism toward white people from black is very much alive and very much well in today's society and the media and government encourage it.

 

One post I made was deleted y mods. I'll try again.

The rioting, burning and looting should have been expected by everyone. When a person of color is harmed, by any person of authority who happens to be Caucasian - the circumstance of an incident is immaterial - certain people of Oakland, Ca. and surrounding cities are quick to riot, burn random businesses, break numerous downtown business's windows and go looting in a holiday frenzy.

Being from the Bay Area, and having witnessed the almost routine behavior mentioned above, the current Missouri free for all grab should be expected. Sorta like finding one's Easter basket.

 

Why in the shit would they delete that?!!!? It's all the truth

 

http://patdollard.com/2014/08/meet-the-real-michael-brown-violent-gun-toting-gangbanger/

wow seems that alot like your dear innocent angel treyvon we have another case of a gang member thief that was unknown as such by the families

 

That is not a surprise. It was not unknown by the family. They saw a way to make money from the death of their kid. They could blame a white man for his death.
It doesn't matter what he was. They want money.

 

That is grotesquely irresponsible.

If anything happens to this police officer he or his survivors (if he is murdered, which now seems likely) should sue the news organs who are responsible for this.

The mainstream media was also irresponsible in the George Zimmerman - Trayvon Martin case. The first thing they showed was a mugshot of George Zimmerman taken after a trivial offense and a photo that was several years old of Trayvon Martin. No one looks good in a mug shot. Taryvon Martin looked sweet, angelic, like a choir boy.

One was led to believe that a fresh faced choir boy was walking home from choir practice when a brutal racist thug shot him "just to watch him die."

 

An autopsy conducted on Michael Brown, the unarmed 18-year-old fatally shot by Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson last Saturday, shows that Brown was shot at least six times, twice in the head and all in the front of the body.

The New York Times reported the results of a private autopsy conducted by Dr. Michael Baden, who was hired by the Brown family.

Baden conducted the autopsy on Sunday, according to the Times.

One bullet entered the top of Brown’s skull. Four struck him in the right arm. All bullets hit Brown in the front of the body, according to the autopsy.

According to Baden, the shots did not appear to have been fired at close range given the lack of gunpowder on Brown’s body. A further determination on gunpowder will have to be made after assessing the teen’s clothes.

Baden provided a diagram to the Times, which shows that the bullet that that struck Brown in the head entered while he was bent forward.

“It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer,” Baden said.

Witnesses to the shooting have told the media that Brown was surrendering by crouching on the ground and holding his hands up as Wilson shot him. The autopsy undermines a common belief circulating among those who think Brown was executed that he was shot in the back as he ran from Wilson.

Nevertheless, Benjamin Crump, who is representing the Brown family, said that the autopsy reveals a “brazen disregard” for Brown.

“The sheer number of bullets and the way they were scattered all over his body showed this police officer had a brazen disregard for the very people he was supposed to protect in that community,” Crump told the Times.

Ferguson police have claimed that Wilson shot Brown after the teen punched him in the face during a struggle inside of the officer’s police cruiser. Wilson claimed that Brown tried to grab his service weapon. (RELATED: Unwitting Witness Pokes Holes In Michael Brown Shooting Story)

Earlier Sunday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder ordered a federal autopsy conducted on Brown. His family has said that it does not trust local law enforcement to conduct a thorough review.

The results of local law enforcement agencies’ autopsy have not been released.

 

Did you get infracted?

 

Sadly I've seen how this movie playing out in Ferguson, MO is likely to end.....



"Can't we all just get along ?"

 

The Missouri riots were the top story on ABC News TV here in Aus. They're becoming a major international embarrassment to the US.

 

What race was doing the rioting?

 

This is good news for Republicans in the next elections. Black ghetto riots remind white blue collar workers why they left the Democratic Party.

 

Nice try doggo but this time you're barking up the wrong tree....

The UK riots had all races, including Asians and Jews.


http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/dec/08/were-the-riots-about-race

An estimate from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) says that 42% of those brought before the courts were white, and 46% black or of mixed heritage. A total of 7% were from an Asian or mixed Asian background.

But the proportions, as noted by the MoJ, varied significantly around the country. In Haringey – including Tottenham, where the rioting began – 34% were white, 55% from a black or mixed background. In Nottingham, 32% were white and 62% from a black or mixed background.

In Birmingham, 46% were from a black background, 33% white and 15% were Asian. In Salford, those taken to court were 94% white; with 6% from a black or mixed background.

Of the 270 rioters interviewed by the Guardian and the LSE, 50% were black, 27% were white, 18% of mixed race and 5% Asian.

Does this mean that people of some races were more likely to join the disorder than others? Possibly. But why? Behind these figures lie a whole range of determinants: poverty, affluence, class, geography.

 

Bottom line: the US is on it's way to becoming a police state and in Ferguson the media was attacked in an attempt to expunge coverage of what was going on. In my opinion, this is NOT about race. It is about the police exercising excessive force, committing murder and attempting to eliminate media coverage. Oh, and btw - don't forget how Homeland Security has enabled and encouraged this bullshit.

 

You left out "opportunity".

The opportunity to loot and pillage with impunity, almost to the point of immunity to prosecution is irresistible to people who disrespect the property rights of others.

A healthy respect for the laws of the land and the fear of prosecution is a key to keeping an orderly society from chaos. The riots show a combination of conflicting perceptions erupting in to that chaos.

Over reactive and oppressive law enforcement, usually brought on by overactive criminal and petty elements, are clashing with those who support the offending activities. All while the media hypes the conflicts.

There are far more peaceful ways to settle differences and to bring light to official indifference.

 

I agree 100%,, i thought maybe I was going overboard as usual to think that the media was wrong for doing it, but i guess I can relax a bit.