I think i would use a different word. Perhaps they are not necessarily bigger whores, they are just getting smarter to the fact that pussy is the one currency all men take and will get them about anything they want. I see this more with the younger girls but i guess each to their own.

 

+100

 

Gender roles were probably created out of physical prowess (and are being perpetuated because of it as well). Because the male generally is stronger physically, they tended to get their way in many ways. Now, you don't need to be physically stronger to get your way as long as you can find someone to do your ass-kicking for you. The whole gun culture is also changing that bias because guns make a weak person strong, if they know how to use that weapon.

I wonder if there has been a study done on the differences between male vs. female produced porn?

 

There's plenty of BDSM where the man is shown being whipped, and being subservient to a cruel mistress.

Here's xvideos' Porn for Women page.

http://www.xvideos.com/?k=porn+for+women

 

WHAT ?
Where on earth do you people get your information from ?

I have NEVER been called wimpy , certainly never effeminate or 'not a real man' ,
and never heard such tripe in this context.
and
What the fuck do guns and strenght have to do with the thread topic , or , anything related to it.

Afraid you reeeeally lost me there.

Am I missing something here ?

 

Your topic deals with how women are becoming freer to express their sexual desires. I was just commenting on how the male was physically dominant. Because of the changes in society (such as guns) have skewed that power to allow women to be less depending and subservient to men.

 

so based on the idiots own observations as posted he apparently recently (like this afternoon) took his head out of his ass
i have news for ya kiddo but one of the first items ever made by man was a dildo
women have been sexually active since their earliest existence
welcome to the 2000s we left the 1770s behind long ago

and one simple thing that you need to understand is that without women we would not even exist
so next time you see a woman you should treat her with the utter respect that is deserved
we do not own or control them they bless us with their presence as they wish

 

How do you measure whorishness objectively? How big is your sample? What are your variables?

 

girls r natrally sluts

 

girls r sluts naturally

 

At least know what I'M talking about before you go on a rant.

Also, fuck this chicken or the egg bullshit about who would be here without who. Women need men, men need women, otherwise we are fucked as a species. Brilliant, moving on. I'll respect whoever I feel like deserves respect and still I won't disrespect anyone unless they give me a reason to. Women are great and all but for fucks sake, quit placing them up on a ridiculous pedestal. I never said anything about owning or controlling them, other than that there are seemingly a lot of them who want us to do that, at least in terms of their sexuality.

 

Rather the reverse; the woman carries and produces the child, and therefore needs to remain at home and in comfort (we're talking about a time when you had to have children pretty much constantly for 30 years in the hope that one or two would survive....) and only the man was available to do the physically-demanding job of going out to hunt food. Women didn't need physical strength, they needed endurance, resilience, and the ability to survive hardship with their pregnancy intact.

Similarly, biologically speaking a woman can only carry one child at a time, but a male can impregnate any number of women. Therefore the best chance of a woman to produce the best possible offspring, is to find the ONE best available man and do everything in her power to keep him; whereas the best chance of a man to produce the best available offspring, is to shag every woman he can lay hands on.


All of this stopped being remotely relevant at least ten thousand years ago, but the biological impulses have not died out. Some (most?) of us are able to overpower mere biological impulses with rational thinking, and see the potential advantages of - for instance - a man just having one woman in his life all the time instead of shagging everything in sight, or conversely, a woman not having to conserve herself for the one special guy buy being able to get a bit of physical pleasure just because it's fun.

Consequently, the sensible opinion, in today's world, is that sleeping with numerous people is fine - after all, successive monogamous relationships, each lasting a year, will see you have over 30 sexual partners by the time you're 50 years old. On the other hand, having over 30 sexual partners EACH WEEK is probably a really bad idea, no matter which gender you are.

 

How fucking stupid can a person get. Have you ever heard of twins.
Are the people in your country so inbred that a woman cannot have more than one baby?
Quit fucking your family and it might change.

 

Oops, fair point ... can only carry the offspring of one father, at a time. I'll correct it.

I won't correct it, my ten minutes is up. It doesn't affect the line of argument in any case, which was that a woman is (or rather, was, when this biological stuff actually mattered!) best served by securing the one man who's best available, not by sleeping with all of them.

 

Damn, you really are stupid. It is possible for a woman to have twins by different fathers.
Don't they have schools over there?

 

Heteropaternal superfecundation is so rare as to be negligible. I didn't bother to bring it up, it still doesn't affect the argument.

 

Pretty sure nothing is different now to how it has ever been. Just our perceptions which have changed. It's time that you wake up and realise that your granny perhaps like to take it in the ass too.

 

And the fact that you still call women who express their desires, and I quote: "sluts, whores, fuck toys, slaves, etc." shows that we´re not there yet. Why do women who want to be, as you said, fucked in the ass or dominated given a label and men who do these things are just men? Think about that, and it´ll answer your question

 

Oh Jamie90, I love your response and totally agree with you.

 

I'm not sure how stupid a person can get but you should be able to tell us, you've reached that level.