Wrong. I was allowed to read because by every criterion I was a dependable guard. Once there was an industrial accident. Because I knew what to do no one was hurt. On another occasion I responded calmly to a break in. I was always able to get the posts I wanted because the supervisors liked me. They knew they could count on me.

I read good books too, including most of ancient Greek and Roman literature.

The fact that you are using this as an excuse to flame me is a revelation of your character.

 

Wrong doggo, I'm just telling you how I see you, you're a .."I'm alright jack, fuck the rest of you" type of person.

 

Again you are wrong.

You follow me around looking for any excuse to flame me. You initiate flame wars. That is something I do not do. I enjoy discussing controversial topics. I like to keep personal insults out of the discussions.

I think the reason for your abrasive behavior is that you think I am a racist. Well, if I am a racist we need to extend the definition to include one who celebrates the qualities of two races that are superior to the race he belongs to.

I do believe that the races have different collective, innate qualities that enable some to create more sucessful societies than others. I believe that these differences have legitimate policy implications, and that they should be discussed publicly without sanctions and taboos.

 

So you wore a para-military uniform, set yourself up as an authority figure, used your "superior" intellect (or maybe white skin) to get assigned to posts which would allow you to hide from any potential danger, shirk responsibility, collect your wage under false pretenses, and read "Mein Kampf". What a wonderful example you show to the young men of this country growing up. If only urban blacks could be just like you.

 

Your criticisms are becoming as picayune as 69magpie's. And for the same reason. You cannot answer my arguments about the existence and importance of racial differences. You cannot dispute the message, so you attack the messenger.

 

Actually, it's more a case of your stuff-shirted buffoonery and your constant ego-flaunting bringing out the worst in me. For pity's sake, man, listen to yourself.

As to disputing your message,

1. Your opinions are not at all important to me. The only reason I jump in on the threads you start, hijack, or monopolize is to poke fun at you.
2. Your links require more time to read than I care to spend on socio-political-statistical crap. Attempting to quantify human behavior and then to manipulate figures to justify hypotheses is the main problem with considering psychology and sociology as hard sciences, a popular trend in the 60s and 70s when you and I got our formal educations.
3. Gathering links of my own to throw at you in an argument seems pointless in light of the above.
4. Zealots never feel they've lost a debate. You would be just as likely to turn a C4-wrapped Jihadist into a Protestant church deacon as I would be to convince you that anything you say is incorrect.
5. Aren't we on a porn forum? If we're talking about race, shouldn't is be inter-racial sex?​

 

You initiate flame wars alright, probably more than anyone else here.......many times you enter threads posting your off topic ridiculous ideology attempting to promote your ideal fucked up world. 90% of the threads you post in turn into bun fights....absolutely you are a flame thrower.

And I know you're a racist......just because you like the Jews and some Asians doesn't exempt you from being labelled as an "Racist arsehole"

 

First of all, and most obviously, I do not care if you or anyone else calls me a racist. What I am certainly is one who acknowledges that on the average people in some racial groups are more likely to be intelligent, and less likely to be criminals than people in other racial groups.

For too long there have been too many taboos and sanctions against discussing racial differences. This is unfortunate, because the differences have legitimate policy implications.

Now your only response to the facts I post about racial differences is to shout "Racist!" at me. You are incapable of a civilized, intelligent discussion of controversial and important topics.

Your use of phrases like, "your ideal fucked up world" is not the mark of a grown man, but of a teenage thug.

 

I am more than willing to have an intelligent and civil conversation......the thing is I wont do it with racists who have a tunnel vision view on the world, just like you doggo.

 

What do you mean by "a tunnel vision view on the world," and how do I have such a vision?

 

a tunnel vision view of the world
you know that manner that your useless racist ass has of making a simplified argument based on manipulable statistics designed to be as vague as possible to vilify those that you feel superior to while you attempt to that you think are better because of a median score on a test that means nothing more than a biased and skewed questionnaire designed to measure an unmeasurable quantity

 

And you say you're the master of facts...obviously not.

tunnel vision
noun

1. defective sight in which objects cannot be properly seen if not close to the centre of the field of view.
   • 
     
   • informal
     the tendency to focus exclusively on a single or limited objective or view.
     "he has tunnel vision in all matters of opinion and morality"

 

You still have not explained how this refers to me. How is my sight "defective?" What do I not see?

 

How are my statistics "manipulable?"

 

You know exactly what I mean.....we've had this discussion at least ten times already.

 

spellcheck fucked me but it was supposed to be manipulatable
and any stat can be manipulated to either prove or disprove anyones point
what people are trying to explain to you is that you cannot keep the macro stats in mind when it is in fact the micro data that is more important
data such as education, nutrition, family, property ownership, and even sexualities

how we perceive the world when we are first developing our brains makes a hell of alot more impact on our futures than any test will ever be able to quantify or define

 

What I know is that you do not like what I say, even though you are aware that what I say is true. Consequently you throw a bunch of insults and obscene words at me. Those insults and obscene words demonstrate that you have nothing to contribute to an important discussion that needs to be held, but expressions of your desire that the discussion not be held.

In a way you resemble a cephalopod who tries to escape by expelling ink.

 

Not only I don't like what you say and stand for........but now you can add this to your list.

I hate you, you are a maggot.

 

It's remarkable how you generalize and jump to conclusions.

Statistics can be poorly gathered, manipulated with intent, or simply mis-reported. I'm not saying the ones you quote necessarily are, but you refuse to make room for the possibility they could be, accepting them as something scrawled on the back of Moses' tablets.

You have no idea whether someone "knows" the truth or lack of it in your arguments. You assume because you say something it must be true, and you make the further assumption that others "know" it too.

People resort to insults in an attempt to break through your self-righteous pseudo-intellectual barrier. Debating with you or responding to you in a genteel manner never works, and your shitty smug asshole attitude fucking pisses people off.

 

I have done nothing to harm you. Hating me for opinions you are unable to refute reveals a bad character on your part. Calling me a "maggot" is not the mark of a civilized human being.

The fact that my opinions anger you so much gives indication that you know that what I say is true. People do not get angry when opinions they are sure are right are challenged.