The question is how can you not? Our biggest problem is our country is not run efficiently. We waste valuable human resources like you would not believe. I personally know upper government employees. Do you know what they say? They say the country is way over staffed. Most employees only concern is hanging in there until retirement. No one rats out their boss, no one rats out anybody. For fear someone points out they are not worth a dime.

People have no idea how bad this country is ran. I'd wager almost every country is just as inefficient we are. Countries have to be run just like a private corporation, the top dog must be aware of every facet of the organization. He must hire the best and stay on top of things. You cannot have bloated divisions doing whatever they want.

 

What kind of experience did Obama have running a country prior to being elected president?

 

Ok I asked how you can compare a company to a country . And you answer how can you not ? I'd say there are many differences

 

Not really. What differences do you see? Would you agree it takes a very good administrator to control a government?

 

Would a single dictator be more efficient?

 

I've got no control over the internet and how it works for others, I just know that the link worked for me...

 

None

 

No a true man of the people would do best not some narcissistic jerk like trump

 

Implying that he wasn't because he "filed bankruptcy four times".

 

Can a country downsize an unprofitable state and lay off all the citizens?

 

Read what you want...

 

Is it possible, yes as he has thrown his hair into the ring...is it probable, not so certain about that...but I think Trump has more closet support than people may think...that some of his views are shared quietly among the masses. As Trump says, "People are tired of incompetence."

 

Trump's seizing on trade and immigration in this campaign has allowed him to tap into the economic anxieties of American workers who have lost out in the global economy, and to capitalize on nativist fears.

Which makes attacking him on those issues, above all, a risky proposition in a Republican primary debate.

“This is a guy who’s saying some outrageous, but not inaccurate, things many people feel,” Mr. Senor said. “I don’t think it’s any candidate’s best interest in trying to take him down.”

 

Actually it is way to early to speculate about Mr Trump. However I will tell you this there is a lot more admiration for him in the black community than people think. It might not be overt, but it's there.

 

And let's not forget who got paid back first in the Solyndra bankruptcy...Obama's billionaire fund-raiser buddy.

Barack Obama's other billionaire: How George Kaiser turned Oklahoma into his personal tax haven

by Bill Allison Oct. 13, 2011, 7:11 a.m

It's unlikely that President Barack Obama will be naming any tax proposals after George B. Kaiser. An investment by the Tulsa billionaire's family foundation in Solyndra, whose bankruptcy may leave taxpayers on the hook for $535 million in federal loans, has raised speculation that the administration acted in part to aid a financial supporter. But the impact on taxpayers of Kaiser's career goes far beyond the $535 million loss. Kaiser has built his fortune in part through shrewdly playing the Internal Revenue Code. In one six year period, during which he increased his net worth enough to land him on the Forbes list of the 400 wealthiest Americans, Kaiser reported taxable income to the Internal Revenue Service just once, totaling $11,699--equivalent to a full-time hourly wage of $5.62.

 

It says his net worth was between $250 million and $400 million. That includes the real estate holdings. So, it's not like it was $250 million in cash. And it was divided by four kids. Still a decent haul, but certainly not "hundreds of millions of dollars plus real estate".

 

And do you remember why William Buffett, a robber baron by any definition, has become a darling of the left and a personal buddy of Barack Obama? Because of that bullshit about how his secretary pays more taxes than he does, which Buffett used to publicly wave the pom poms for raising taxes on the "rich."

For that one public relations favor, Barack Obama's been stonewalling the Keystone Pipeline for six years going on seven. What does one have to do with the other? Because Buffett's making a fortune moving crude oil from Canada to the United States by rail.

And Hillary Clinton, when pressed on what she would do about Keystone as president, refuses to answer the question. Why? Because she's got her nose up Warren Buffett's asshole, too.

Trump, on Keystone? BUILD IT. Period.

Someone tell me, again, why "President Donald Trump" is such a bad idea.

 

Is he Warren Buffet's smarter brother?