Hey he may be right, we probably didn't land on the moon either.

 

I answered your question boy, so if you want to join the grown ups table work on your reading comprehension skills.

 

That answer was from you ? It looked like Wikipedia to me

 

Common sense says that the best evidence of a conspiracy is no evidence at all. What good is a conspiracy if every person involved keeps complete silence, no matter what happens later? We aren't dealing with ordinary people. Common sense says anyone who could do this and not leave a shred of evidence has to be perfect.

 

Ahh common sense reason which dictates that it was in fact a conspiracy . Evidence has been produced for a number of different perpetrators . Following deductive reason leads you to one man . of course the most obvious answer is the answer only when the obvious is ruled out is the extraordinary possible and since we will never actually test our theories on the matter we can only rely on common sense but in the coming to that conclusion other questions arise now don't they . Two in particular can NORAD keep us safe if they can't track a sub sonic passenger plane how the hell are they going to track a super sonic nuke ? and is it really a good idea to give money to maniacs that intend to build armies ?

 

At any hour of the day, there are several thousand subsonic aircraft flying within the borders of the United States, but I take your point. If a center fielder can't toss a bunt to first base, why should we believe he can catch a fly ball at the fence.

It's just common sense.

 

This is a weird analogy.....but I like it.

 

Actually they were 2 engine planes and parts of the turbines etc were found. These crashes were far outside the norm of what survived and what didn't even as far as jetliner crashes go. It is extremely rare for jets to crash at full speed (500-600MPH) and it is even more rare they crash into something as solid as the Pentagon. Enough debris corresponding to an American Airlines 757 was found at the site for a positive ID. Aside from the HUNDREDS of witnesses who saw a commercial jetliner heading towards and/or crashing into the building.

 

Bah! That is just PROOF through EVIDENCE! How can that possibly stand up against paranoid fantasy?

 

All good truther scenarios depend upon a basic ignorance and lack of understanding of engineering and science. When something happens which does not conform to their limited understanding of world, they have no choice but to conjure up scenarios which are plausible only in their own world.

The common sense truther has no idea why or how the World Trade Center could stand a hundred stories high and not fall over. It just does. When it falls down, it can't be for an easy to understand reason. There must be more to it. This is the genesis of stories of a faceless army of controlled demolition experts who work for a month before the attack and then vanish without a trace. I read one story about a suitcase nuclear weapon. This was based on the difference between the amount of steel used to build the WTC and the amount which was recovered in scrap. The missing steel was evaporated in a nuclear blast. Don't take my word for it. There's a list of 2000 engineers and scientists who think it's true.

 

It explained the chain of command dip shit, answered your question, yet your whining lil ass can't absorb the information. Have you always been such a maggot?

 

I didn't ask what the chain of command was I asked how a system designed to maintain air supremacy failed 4 times in a row in one day and your lame Wikipedia quote didn't answer that . As far as how long have I been a maggot not long at all actually I was reincarnated as one in a past life I was a republican like you I'm much happier now and soon I will be able to fly

 

Bullshit, you asked where was NORAD. What I posted stated what the commission found. Grow up or go away.

 

I will not grow up and I will not go away thank you very much

 

I will not grow up and I will not go away thank you very much . And what you posted wasn't stated by "the commission " it came from Wikipedia . you should find more reliable sources .

 

There is a great book called, "Touching History" by Lynn Spencer. It is a very detailed and thoroughly investigated account of the FAA and NORAD operations on 9/11/01.

 

Lynn spencer huh ? I'll check it out I'm always looking for my next read thank you

 

Oh she's a pilot cool

 

I saw this a few weeks back on YouTube. Click the link to watch - it's over an hour long, so you'll need some time and a very open mind. It's a unbiased technical and architectural analysis done by engineering experts.

 

Those buildings dropped right on their footprints. Come on. Nuff said.