Damn they would have to be super desperate and insane to want to look at that. The thought of seeing that windbag as a stripper is nauseating at best, not to mention the smell

 

That dog still wont hunt. Conservative groups and organizations can be bipartisan and maintain bipartisanship, just as FACT has done this year.

Until of course the group gets hijacked by someone that has an agenda, as of now, there is no evidence of your claims.

Politifact on the other hand, certainly has an agenda.

 

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Conservative+Foundation+for+Accountability+and+Civic+Trust

 

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/...ice-congressional-ethics-214143#ixzz3vSPuLP3R

DAMN, them some bipartisan mother fuckers!

 

Did you miss the second word of the quote?

Also compartments and bipartisan are not synonymous

 

In his haste to prove you wrong, he missed something... Something important...

 

It does not matter how corrupt Ms Clinton is, she will never be president of the U.S.A. Don't worry, trust me she's toast.

 

I sure as holy hell hope you are right.... Even with all the proof, iron clad proof, that the bitch is a phony criminal bitch half the country loves that motherfucker.

 

I heard Hillary liked to suck Michelle Obama's penis.

 

Also, admittedly, in my haste....I let "nonpartisan" be corrected to "compartments" somehow

 

Iron clad proof? Seriously... What iron clad proof?

And don't forget, I don't like her either!

 

I really don't know about how one goes about determining the veracity of any news source today. It would appear they all have their bias's. However I do like the old adage, where there is smoke there is fire. One must admit there has been a lot of smoke over the decades.

 

The fact that the FBI, and the state department have confirmed that she did in fact have top secret information on her home server. That's proof enough for me.

 

And this is based on the word of Tom Delay? Got any other proof? I've looked and it seems there isn't much just yet, other than the usual right wing sources.

 

It came directly from the Obama White House last Friday. Of course they downplayed the entire situation, but non the less admitted she did in fact have classified info on her server.

 

All of this is conjecture.

 

This is really interesting. People are complaining watch dog groups are biased. Interesting to say the least. Have you ever in your entire life met a unbiased person? I haven't. So just how would you go about finding a totally unbiased source of information? I just read a article about Dr Carson in the Washington Post, it was the silliest attack article I've ever read. Just who can you trust for honest unbiased news reports? There is absolutely no way. Even putting data in computers and having the data analyzed will not work. Humans have to enter the data. So just who can you believe?

 

So when will they be presenting their evidence to a DA?

 

Mark Meadows is my representative, and I think he is doing a fantastic job. He had the balls to stand up to John Boehner, and we love him for it. His approval rating in our district is close to 60%. They just had it on the front page of the liberal Charlotte Observer, but I don't remember the exact number. It was well above 50%.