Condi did what again? Your own source, the Yahoo link states:

And a CNN article appears to back that up.

Condi did nuttin' at all in regards to mishnandling classified emails. And Powell's two, count 'em TWO emails later deemed "Confidential",

According to Wikipedia:

Terminology In the U.S., information is called "classified" if it has been assigned one of the three levels: Confidential, Secret, or Top Secret.

Confidential This is the lowest classification level of information obtained by the government.

As of 1/22/16

22 Hillary Clinton emails declared 'top secret' by State Dept.


Thus far, about 1,300 emails from Hillary Clinton's account have been deemed classified.



So, we have:

Powell - 2 at the lowest level of classification
Rice - 0
Clinton - 1300 with 22 at the highest level of classification (so much so, that even the committee investigating her didn't even have clearance)

Yep, pretty much equal, huh?

 

While we're talking about scandals, and political cost, consider; On April 23, 2015, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was given a two year probationary period and a fine of $100,000. The investigation into this scandal started while Clinton was Secretary of state. By all accounts, the General was surely guilty of stupid dick syndrome, but did not reveal top secrets.
Matt Bissonnette, the seal who shot Bin Laden, took a picture of Bin Laden's body. A subsequent investigation led to him giving up most of the profits from a book he wrote after investigators determined the photo was "secret". After the fact.
And while we're talking about Clinton and his scandal, lets remember that Clinton DID lie and was disbarred as a result. "Ken Starr witch hunt" is just Democratic hate machine talk for "he fucked an intern; so what?

So, given the penalties Bissonnette and Petreus paid for their indescretions, what would a fair penalty for Clinton be, assuming the investigation confirms what is being investigated?
Petreus lost his job and now they're going after his pension.
Bissonnette lost millions and a nifty photo from work.

 

All of a sudden, I'm thinking, maybe it wouldn't be so bad if Liz Warren were to jump in the race.





I only grabbed about a page of replies.

Here's the link if you want to check out some of the other replies. I have no idea how many there, but I'm sure they number in the thousands. Just keep scrolling.

https://twitter.com/SenWarren/status/693097354140975104

So, it looks like maybe Liz didn't like being told to have a seat and wait till her highness has ascended to the throne first.

 

She violated the Freedom of Information Act, the Federal Records Act, the National Archives and Records Administrations regulations, and section 1924 of title 18 US Crimes and Criminal Procedures codes.

 

What Condi did and what Colin Powell did were not the same thing that Hillary Clinton did.

The claim is utterly nonsensical, and Hillary's apologists are lapping it up.

 

It doesn't matter. Democrats have no chance at winning ..but then again lots of dumbasses out there heehe. ..that sanders
Fella...damn

 

Obama didn't have a prayer, either.

 

Don't get me wrong, I would love to see a woman in the White House just not Hilary Clinton. She is a dangerous person that has more skeletons in her closet than we ever want to know about. Even if she does pull off a miracle and wins how affective could she be with all the Republicans in both Houses.

Albright didn't help her cause with her loose lipped comment the other night about "a special place in hell" either.

 

If Powell ran, he'd never win the Rep nomination, but I think he'd have a decent shot in the general. He's a reasonably moderate Republican. I'd vote for him over Hilary unless he fell into the same mistakes McCain did. Sure, he got on board with Iraq, but hesitantly. He at least realized the risks... but he is a military man. But the important thing is that he at least considered the consequences.

However, Rice's blatant lies and promotion of the war would probably end her in the general election.

 

Despite all the hoopla, there is only one person being investigated for improper storage of classified material. All the talk of what others did is meaningless.

 

I worked with TS/SCI and TS/SAP materials. If I or my co-workers did what Clinton and her staff did we would have been dropped in a deep, dark hole for 30 years. Dropped in that hole within 24 hours.

 

Hillary will not be indicted, if so Obama will pardon her and she will be the next president no matter how the popular vote goes.

 

You would be right, but for one thing: he cannot pardon her unless she is convicted. That is one of the reasons why they are dragging out the Benghazi and email investigations.

Most people think she dodged a bullet on Benghazi (at best), or extricated herself from the "Republican Hate Machine" (at worst).

Yet none of those people for once stop and ask how they think they know that.

Because in fact the Benghazi investigation is still open and active, and the investigation itself has offered not a single opinion, whatsoever, much less a CONCLUSION.

The bottom line is that ALL opinions on the subject are derived directly and exclusively from Clinton and Obama propaganda.

 

If Ms Clinton is not indicted and tried fairly all U.S. citizens are in dire danger.

 

Precisely why private email must be secure...puts US citizens in dire danger.

 

We got more positives out of conducting that war than we've gotten since Bush's departure by cutting and running.

Cindy Sheehan was holding candlelight vigils over body bags that numbered in the hundreds.

How many have died since Obama's Arab Spring? Half a million? Is that an exaggeration? If it is, it is not exaggerating by much. It may even be shy.

And yet... where, oh where is Cindy Sheehan now?


(cue crickets)

 

double post

 

Do you know that you are a felon if you do your own drywall?

Do you know that, in many states, you are committing a misdemeanor (at least) and possibly a felony if you change your own lightbulb?

And yet the liberal fascists still parrot the claim that Hillary Clinton has committed no crime.

 

I'm not sure what your point is, but you're using soldier deaths in the first and civilian deaths in the second.
Come on now, you didn't think I'd catch that?