Really?

Strikes me as remarkably tone-deaf.

Trump wasn't elected by mobs with pitchforks. The people who voted for him did so quietly. They went meekly, obstinately, and defiantly to the polls, despite being pigpiled by the establishment, the mainstream media, and social media for eighteen straight months.

Since November 8th, who are the mobs that have been brandishing the torches and pitchforks?

The left. A near-rabid mob that has spent millions to try to undo the results, ,that has demonstrated in the streets, that has demonstrated at state houses.

Mob gatherings are planned for January 20, January 21, and beyond. Resistance movements are forming on social media.

The mainstream media, caught in its death throes, is fomenting the unrest.

The people who voted for Trump are still being bullied. In workplaces, on the streets, and in government. Thinly veiled "hate hotlines," operated by state governments are really nothing more than instruments designed to harass and silence conservative voices.

The crime committed by those voices? Refusing to lay down silently, bare their necks, and take it.

We are, indeed, in for an ugly future. But neither Trump nor the right are are cause.

How is the right taking the growing unrest? The same way they voted. Meekly, quietly, defiantly, obstinately.

And I doubt I am the only person who remains skeptical that the rabid left will allow Trump to make it to the inauguration still possessed of a pulse and a 98.6F body temperature.

 

Those who think the revolution is some drug fomented joke foisted by a lonely alien from Xcebia will learn in time that the revolution is anything but a joke.

The wide swath of middle Americans; the ones who don't belong to some special group demanding special rights, the ones who don't view Government as their savior, who don't believe being a patriotic American is a bad thing, are up and moving. They don't have a leader, they don't belong to an organization, they don't contribute to some war chest earmarked for future advertisements.

They ask quiet questions like "How come your net worth while in office has so greatly exceeded the average for Americans?" and "Who are the top 10 contributors to your campaign, and how much?"
And they vote accordingly.

 

The closest we'll come to a "revolution" due to Trump is like the one that overthrew the Weimar Republic in 1932, leading to its demise in 1933. Terrifyingly, the similarities are shockingly close.

Hush....an alias

 

Care to provide a shred of evidence? Or is this just another of your exaggerations?

 

Not a fan of the first amendment...

 

And those that disagree with trump are getting death threats...

 

Russian government hackers do not appear to have targeted Vermont utility, say people close to investigation

Washington Post retracts story about Russian hack at Vermont utility

As federal officials investigate suspicious Internet activity found last week on a Vermont utility computer, they are finding evidence that the incident is not linked to any Russian government effort to target or hack the utility, according to experts and officials close to the investigation.

An employee at Burlington Electric Department was checking his Yahoo email account Friday and triggered an alert indicating that his computer had connected to a suspicious IP address associated by authorities with the Russian hacking operation that infiltrated the Democratic Party. Officials told the company that traffic with this particular address is found elsewhere in the country and is not unique to Burlington Electric, suggesting the company wasn’t being targeted by the Russians. Indeed, officials say it is possible that the traffic is benign, since this particular IP address is not always connected to malicious activity.

 

Trump getting intel briefings on “daily basis,” says spokesperson

WASHINGTON — Incoming White House press secretary Sean Spicer is defending cryptic comments by President-elect Donald Trump that he knows ‘‘things that other people don’t know’’ when it comes to allegations of Russian hacking.

Spicer tells Fox News Channel’s ‘‘Fox & Friends’’ that Trump is getting national security briefings ‘‘on a daily basis’’ and ‘‘there doesn’t seem to be conclusive evidence’’ Russians were behind the hacking of Democratic emails during the election.

Spicer also dismissed on Monday a report released by the FBI and Homeland Security Department supporting the accusations against Russia, calling it a ‘‘how-to’’ manual on basic cybersecurity for Democrats.

In an interview on NBC’s ‘‘Today Show,’’ Spicer said President Barack Obama only punished Russia after Democrat Hillary Clinton lost the election and that the recent sanctions were politically motivated.

 

On Hannity tonight (which I will not be watching), Assange will throw down the gauntlet and challenge Obama to provide a shred of proof that the Russians had anything to do with the Wikileaks releases (which are erroenously referred to here and elsewhere as hacking).

 

Is that what you call it, when people disrupt traffic and retail customer traffic in city centers without permits to gather?

First Amendment rights. Clearly your a selective fan of them.

Now you're concerned.

As opposed to your lack of concern for the actions of your girl, who wanted to shred it in the process of getting revenge on her political enemies by overthrowing the Citizens United ruling.

 

Yet it is the left that look, sound, and act like fascists, cannot engage their adversaries in rational debate, and seek to silence them instead by controlling political speech.

Projection, projection, projection.

 

Bull-fucking-shit! I have not seen ONE SINGLE story/article/op-ed piece alluding to anything like this "Buyer's remorse" (with the exception of the BREXIT that the American media tried to latch onto before the election), never mind one that could be considered credible.

Bull-fucking-shit Pard Deux! While we all sling hatchets over the fences at each other from opposite sides of the political spectrum, NOBODY but NOBODY on this forum listens to what the other side says and says, "Gee, now that you put it that way..." And if they do, I'm curious as to how they managed to make it this far in life that they would make a decision to vote based on something they read on an anonymous porn forum. Charlie probably has an award waiting for them just down the road.

So, just give it a break, Hush.

Case in point!

 

Care to provide a shred of evidence?

 

Painting with a broad brush. Not everyone is doing those things.

We obviously have two very different interpretations of Citizen United. And unlimited money is not free speech.

 

Look up Chuck Jones, the union leader at Carrier.

 

Exactly. Trump said he knows a lot about hacking as a means of dismissing US intelligence who are in agreement that Russia was respo9nsible for the hacks at the DNC.

So Trump is claiming he knows more about hacking than US inte3lligence.

And if that is not true and he does not know more about hacking than US intelligence he just lied to the American people and sided with Russia against the US government.

Actually if the man who will be president in 18 days just committed treason and sided with Russia against the US government that is a very big deal.

 

Oh, I am sure you do.

I doubt you have a clue that the case against Citizens United had its start with your girl, as a vendetta, in response to critical press.

But maybe you do know that, and do not care.

Your selective outrage amuses me.

What strikes me is that any critique of Obama's policies brought accusations of racism. One did not dare publicly express outrage.

Yet you are expressing outrage by the hour, over the words and actions of a man who has not even been inaugurated and will not spend his first minute as president for weeks.

How are you going to survive the next four years? It seems to me you're going to burst a blood vessel before he even reaches office, at the rate you are going.

 

Red herrings.

The Wikileaks were not hacks.

It is all deflection from the incontrovertible fact that the content of each and every email is authentic.

 

trea·son
ˈtrēzən/
noun
noun: treason; noun: high treason; plural noun: high treasons
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

 

I saw this, too.

The word we are looking for is "unhinged."

Even more surreal: Stumbler is insinuating in a nearby post that Trump has committed treason.

For stepping back from the brink of World War III, Trump is committing treason.

It's impossible to make this up. If I took this storyline to my editor, he would say, "Go home. Burn this. Sober up. And start again, with something plausible."