CNN’s Anderson Cooper Questions Christine Ford’s Lawyer on Delaying Senate Testimony

https://www.mediaite.com/tv/cnns-an...ne-fords-lawyer-on-delaying-senate-testimony/

 

Yep. A stalling tactic.

Vote already!

 

Ivanka Trump advising her dad to ‘cut bait’ and withdraw Brett Kavanaugh nomination: report

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/09/iv...t-withdraw-brett-kavanaugh-nomination-report/

 

Unsuporter wet dreams.

 

I'm pretty sure he still will be voted in.
And if not lol. The next guy trump picks will be be even cleaner and more constitutional

 

I think people have made up their minds and Ford's Testimony is not going to change anything.

Time to vote....

 

LOL, even the Huffpo is starting to call BS on Christine Ford...

Mark Judge, key witness to alleged Brett Kavanaugh assault: 'I have no memory of this alleged incident'




Carla Herreria
Sep 18th 2018 9:16PM


Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

“I did not ask to be involved in this matter nor did anyone ask me to be involved,” Judge said in a letter signed by his lawyer on Tuesday. “The only reason I am involved is because Dr. Christine Blasey Ford remembers me as the other person in the room during the alleged assault.”

“In fact, I have no memory of this alleged incident,” he added. “Brett Kavanaugh and I were friends in high school but I do not recall the party described in Ford’s letter. More to the point, I never saw Brett act in the matter Dr. Ford describes.”

Judge added: “I have no more information to offer the Committee and I do not wish to speak publicly regarding the incidents described in Dr. Ford’s letter.”

 

I was listening the the radio yesterday they couldn't get a single woman , to call and defend her.
They tried believe me .

 

So you like Huffington Post do you? Good.

Kavanaugh High School Pal Writes In Memoir Of Being Wild Drunk With Girls
“If you could breathe and walk you could hook up,” Mark Judge, now a writer and filmmaker, recalls of his teen years, when he was friends with the now-Supreme Court nominee.

*As most legal experts are pointing out there is a world of difference between saying something never happened and saying something did not happen because Judge has already admitted to getting blackout drunk which would explain why he has no memory of the incident.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...-drunk-with-girls_us_5b9f23ebe4b013b0977bf68b

 

Drinking problems usually become worse over time. If Kavanaugh was having alcoholic black outs at the age of seventeen he may not be "as sober as a judge."

 

Time to vote.

 

For that matter, where are his other sexual victims?

The unsupporters got nothing but Ford, and that ain't enough.

These sleazy tactics are going to have serious blowback in the midterms.

- shootersa

----------

Huffington Post September 17, 2018

A group of women who went to Christine Blasey Ford’s high school are circulating a letter to show support for the woman who has alleged that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh tried to sexually assault her while they were in high school.

“We believe Dr. Blasey Ford and are grateful that she came forward to tell her story,” says a draft letter from alumnae of Holton-Arms, a private girls school in Bethesda, Maryland. “It demands a thorough and independent investigation before the Senate can reasonably vote on Brett Kavanaugh’s nomination to a lifetime seat on the nation’s highest court.”

The women also say that what Ford is alleging “is all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton. Many of us are survivors ourselves.”...

More than 200 women had signed the letter as of late Monday morning, said Sarah Burgess, a member of the class of 2005.

----------

From this news story it seems like the women who signed the letter were not complaining about Brett Kavanaugh specifically, but about a sexually hostile atmosphere they grew up with.

Nevertheless, Christina King Miranda tweeted the following comment:

"I graduated from Holton Arms, and knew both Brett Kavanaugh and Mark Judge. Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me, I remember her. I signed this letter. The incident was spoken about for days afterwards in school. Kavanaugh should stop lying, own up to it and apologize."

So shootersa, I do not think that this issue will hurt the Democrats in November. I do think that this matter deserves a thorough investigation.

I have always had a certain amount of sympathy for the religious right. I think Christian conservatives should agree 100% with feminists that girls and women should never be sexually harassed and sexually abused.

 

We have plenty of time. What's the rush?

 

Maybe if the politicians would do their job and quit looking for ways to not do their job they could get more done.

 

Did you feel that way when the Senate refused to even conduct hearings on President Obama’s nominee?

 

I don't even remember it. I would say the same thing then as I do know.
We have too many democrats and republicans to really get anything done.

 

Sounds like your fucking hero Bill the serial rapist Clinton...

 

There are witnesses who are saying the attempted rape by Kavanaugh was talked about a lot at school after the incident happened. They do not want to come forward for fear of getting killed.

Which is exactly why the FBI needs to interview them.

 

And this is what people are saying about Christine Ford on Stanford University web site...

The libtard hacks tried to delete them all but missed a few...

 

Christine Blasey Ford’s Rate My Professors conveniently blank

Published

1 day ago
on

September 18, 2018
By

Ray Fava

• 
  
  • Share
  • Tweet
  
  
  

As soon as Christine Blasey Ford went on the record, it became known that she was a professor in the field of psychology at the Palo Alto University who also taught at Stanford University. Recent reports circulated on Twitter and Facebook of how students brutalized Professor Ford in their reviews. However what garnered an equal amount of attention was the censorship of this article. And perhaps Rate My Professors is also guilty of censorship.



The article in question was published on TheFederalistPapers.org by the site’s ringleader, Steve Straub. However Miguelifornia was unknowingly tweeting fakenews. It’s understandable how someone who believes is QAnon would so willingly overlook critical details, mainly that this isn’t the Christine Ford that is accusing Brett Kavanaugh.

She’s currently a professor in the Social Work Department at California State University – Fullerton.

Christine Blasey Ford does not teach at Fullerton. Meaning, this article is connecting the wrong person to the Kavanaugh accuser. This is a case of shoddy journalism. Now the issue of Twitter censorship is real. It also appears Twitter does not like Mr. Straub’s site.

What do the reviews actually say?
Christine Ford has been a professor so having taught students, its more than likely she has true reviews that can actually be found. Except she doesn’t. The two pages on Rate My Professors, the gold standard website for professor reviews are both void of reviews.


Palo Alto University page


Stanford University page

No reviews could be found on lesser competitors or indirect competitors. Stephanie Dube Dwilson of Heavy noted:

It’s not known if they never had reviews or if reviews were removed, but there are no reviews on her two pages.

Key Questions
So how do reviews just not exist for a professor. It’s understandable how the Stanford page may be blank, but the Palo Alto page should, in theory have some reviews. So this invites speculation as to whether Rate My Professors wiped her page clean after she went public and before the internet could vet her page for curiosity. If she had a 4.5 would her review still be up there? If they were worried about spam posts to smear Ford, why not simply lock her page. It does a disservice to students who are deciding to take her to censor information that could be used in a class scheduling decision. Why does Rate My Professors even care to intervene on Christine Ford’s behalf? It’s completely understandable to lock the page, like Wikipedia often does on controversial topics.

Final Thoughts
It is unlikely any student ratings would have been germane to Christine Blasey Ford’s accusations against Brett Kavanaugh. However, they could have undermined her character. Suppose more than one student rated her and their reviews said that she was a liar. Or what if a review said that she sexually harassed a student. This information could have undermined her accusations against the Supreme nominee, as opposed to her being a tough grader or even a poor educator. However the issue here has less to do with how the reviews impact the situation at-hand and more about how Rate My Professors likely wiped reviews in an effort to minimize scrutiny in regards to Ford.