Well, but apparently the despicables intend to.continue their assault on Kavanaugh.

No matter. Until the despicables learn that shrill spew does not further their agenda the beatings will contimue.

Cry closet is reportedly grid locked. Has anyone seen subby? Heard a rumor she was tied up and in a corner, but couldn't get close enough to see.

 

It's not over til they say it's over, cuz we have princess Pelosi saying it's not over, damn...it's not over.

As they say...rumors are premature facts.

 

Subby is around. Even Stumbles has been pretty quiet. The ones I see going on about Kavanaugh here the most are his supporters, intent on rubbing it in with comments about despicables and cry closets.

 

Cry closet on the left.

 

LOL, don't need it. Apparently neither do Subby or Stumbles or the others in here you choose to insult. But apparently you need a 'crow closet' you can go to squawk about Kavanaugh.

 

True subby and stumbles are snuggled up in silence. They left poor Dl all alone lol

 

Gallup, JULY 12, 2018

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- As the U.S. Senate prepares to hold confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, the public is strongly opposed to any attempts to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling that made abortion legal nationwide. Currently, 64% of Americans believe Roe v. Wade should stand, while 28% would like to see it overturned...

The poll was conducted July 2-8, just before President Donald Trump announced Kavanaugh as his nominee to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy. Many Democratic senators quickly voiced their opposition to the conservative 53-year-old judge and vowed to vote against his confirmation, based largely on his judicial record and his stances on a number of issues, including abortion and the Affordable Care Act...

The American public stands firmly on the side of upholding Roe v. Wade. Gallup has measured the public's views of the decision periodically since 1989 and has found majority-level support for keeping the 1973 ruling in place, ranging from 52% to 68%. The current reading is on the higher end measured...

Partisans' opinions are sharply polarized, with 81% of Democrats, 70% of independents and 41% of Republicans saying they do not want Roe v. Wadeoverturned. In contrast, 51% of Republicans, 22% of independents and 13% of Democrats want it reversed.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/237071...ericans%20Want%20Roe%20v.%20Wade%20to%20Stand

--------

With a conservative majority on the Supreme Court the Court does not have any obvious excuse not to overturn Roe vs Wade.

Since 1980 the religious right has been an essential Republican constituency. It has been important for Republican electoral victories. For Christian conservatives, outlawing abortion is the most important issue. If the Supreme Court with Kavanaugh on it waffles on this issue, Christian conservatives will feel betrayed. If the Court overturns Roe vs Wade Republican libertarians will be tempted to stop voting Republican.

Either way, the GOP is likely to lose a lot of votes.

 

The despicable argument that kavanaugh will overturn roe v wade is an unproven assumption.
During his confirmation hearing kavanaugh said he considered Roe V Wade to be settled law. Despite attempts to call kavanaugh a liar for this statement it is clear Kavanaugh is more likely than not to support roe v wade, not overturn it.

 

Kavanaugh referred to birth control as “abortion-inducing drugs.”be

more often then not no they don't unless they pay for it themselves unless their on a high ranking committee or a cabinet member most elected officers do not have SS protection.
now I could be wrong I have been in the past (just ask my wife)

 

You can be as ignorant as you want...it's your prerogative.

 

That's why this nation has elections, I dont care who looses their seat, their constituance are entitled to make that decision for them.

Yes...yes it will, Rule of law is about to take a foot hold on this nation, and it is required, to maintain the Republic.

Nope....ya wanna see my dick?

 

Only history dictates that the GOP will lose seats.

However, I have not seen a reason or a message that persuades me to believe that the left will gain many seats.

 

@Distant Lover
Any politician would be nuts , to engage in Conversation over abortion. There's no correct answer . Only the people involved no what best for them. Most of the left don't even give a shit either way, but they know that topic throws a monkey wrench into everything Move on Dl next

 

Actually, that was Krooked Kamala and her friends at the abortin' distortin' Planned Parenthood's doing with much editing.


Kamala Harris pushes deceptively edited video to smear Brett Kavanaugh. But here’s the truth.


9/9/18

California Sen. Kamala Harris (D) and Planned Parenthood have come under fire for pushing a deceptively edited video that purportedly shows Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh describing contraceptives as “abortion-inducing drugs.”

As it turns out, that’s far from what Kavanaugh said.

What’s the truth?
The moment happened last Thursday when Sen. Ted Cruz asked Kavanaugh about a case involving Priests for Life. The pro-life organization had sued the government challenging the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate provision, arguing the method for opting out of the mandate “unlawfully burdened their exercise of free religion,” according to National Review.

In Priests for Life v. HHS, a three-judge panel on the D.C. Circuit Court ruled against Priests for Life. The organization then requested an en banc hearing from the full D.C. Circuit, but the court denied the request. Kanavaugh wrote a dissent from the en banc denial explaining he believed Obamacare’s mandate, and the government’s opting out method, would “substantially burden the religious organizations’ exercise of religion.”

On Thursday, Cruz asked Kavanaugh to explain his dissent.

“That was a group that was being forced to provide a certain kind of health coverage over their religious objection to their employees and under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the question was: First, was this a substantial burden on the religious exercise? And it seemed to me quite clearly it was,” Kavanaugh said.

“It was a technical matter of filling out a form in that case. They said filling out the form would make them complicit in the provision of the abortion-inducing drugs that they, as a religious matter, objected to,” he explained.

Indeed, Kavanaugh was only repeating how Priests for Life described contraceptive drugs to the court. D.C. Circuit Justice Cornelia Pillard wrote in the majority opinion:

It is undisputed that Plaintiffs all sincerely believe that life begins at conception and that contraception is contrary to Catholic tenets. Priests for Life, for example, was founded to spread the Gospel of Life, which “affirms and promotes the culture of life and actively opposes and rejects the culture of death.” Pls.’ Br. 11. Catholic doctrine prohibits “impermissible cooperation with evil,” and thus opposes providing access to “contraceptives, sterilization, and abortion-inducing products,” which the Church views as “immoral regardless of their cost.”

What did Harris do?
Harris tweeted out a highly deceptive 11-second video that removed all context from Kavanaugh’s comments. The video, therefore, made it appear that “abortion-inducing drugs” is how Kavanaugh personally views contraceptives.

“Kavanaugh chooses his words very carefully, and this is a dog whistle for going after birth control,” Harris wrote. “He was nominated for the purpose of taking away a woman’s constitutionally protected right to make her own health care decisions. Make no mistake — this is about punishing women.”

After being widely condemned, Harris on Saturday tweeted the full context for Kavanaugh’s comments. Still, she stood by her characterization.

“Here is Kavanaugh’s full answer. There’s no question that he uncritically used the term ‘abortion-inducing drugs,’ which is a dog whistle term used by extreme anti-choice groups to describe birth control,” Harris said.

Mainstream media outlet CNN helped push Harris’ version of events.

What did Planned Parenthood do?
In a press release, the pro-abortion group left out the words “they said,” making it appear that Kavanaugh was describing his personal position on contraceptives. They later “acknowledged the error,” according to CNN.

-----------------------------

And in other "Shocked I'm Not" news...

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/hillary-clinton-repeats-kamala-harriss-false-kavanaugh-claim/


Jumping on the "Smear today. Hopefully gone tomorro." bandwagon, more than a full week after the original, no surprise from Lyin' Lizzie's acctions either.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-slammed-over-editing-of-kavanaugh-video

 

You should become embarassed when the topic of ignorance comes up,

and hope someone changes the subject.

 

Republican politicians will try to avoid the conversation. The topic will be broached by their supporters in the religious right. Donald Trump promised them that he would nominate anti abortion justices to the Supreme Court.

There do not seem to be many "pro lifers" on XNXX. The right wing posters here have other right wing concerns. Nevertheless, for millions of Republicans abortion has been the most important issue since the Supreme Court legalized this most gruesome of operations in 1973.