They're doing it again:

• Authorities said that the perpetrators are 'young men, who are foreigners'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-scenes-similar-Cologne-New-Year-attacks.html


17-year-old tells of horror after mob of 'foreign youths' sexually assault 35 females as young as 12 at Swedish music festival.

 

Hell after the bombing in Saudi Arabia yesterday, it appears Muslim's can't even live with themselves! So just how in the hell can anybody else live with them?

 

That kind of thinking caused George the Lesser to invade Iraq. It caused Adolf Hitler to invade the Soviet Union. He said prior to the invasion, "All I have to do is kick down the door, and the whole rotten edifice will collapse."

Don't get me wrong. I want ISIS to be destroyed. I do not think it will be easy or cheap.

 

I think moslim people are nice good people

 

Obama has the gumption to tell my country we should be accepting more immigrants. Why isn't he telling Israel to do that? Why isn't he telling the Saudis to take immigrants?

 

Back in 2012, the Wentzel Strategies group conducted a poll asking American Muslims about their faith and the law.

More than half – 58 percent – believed that criticism of “Islam or Muhammad” is not permitted under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and 45 percent of Muslims believed people who criticize the religion should “face criminal charges.”

But that’s not the shocker. The poll also revealed that 11.5 percent of American Muslims – of which there are more than 5 million – either strongly agreed or somewhat agreed that “Americans who criticize or parody Islam should be put to DEATH.” (that number would be much higher now and will be even higher if we continue to import these people.)

For those doing the math, based on the 2012 numbers, that’s more than a half-million American Muslims who wanted death for anybody criticizing Islam back in 2012.

Does anyone remember when Mr. Obama suggested that anyone criticizing Islam should face criminal prosecution? I wonder where he got that idea?

 

So, what’s the difference? Don’t they all worship the same Allah, read the same holy books, share the same ideology, the same history and the same laws? As far as I know there is no moderate Koran or Extreme Koran, there is only the Koran. Therefore it seems to me that the only difference between peaceful Muslims and jihadist is how devot they are about their religion. The most devote Muslims are the ones who are most likely to become jihadists. That’s an unpredictable situation since any Muslim at any time can suddenly become more devote. With that in mind we have to ask ourselves if we can live with Muslims without risking our safety, our national security, our culture and the safety of our families.

I'd like to respond to the second paragraph of the OP.

Look at how many religions we have in the US already. They all (Except for a few) read the same book or books, some of them have been edited over the last 2000+ years to have only the things they want their religious followers to believe in. There are complete chapters missing.in pretty much all of them. Why is that?

My father used to go to a Southern Baptist church until he had a talk with the minister about how much studying he does in order to make it way what he thinks it needs to say in that weeks preachings. The minister said he had 19 versions of the bible that he reads up on to write a service. SO basically, he's interpreting the same verses and scriptures in 19 books and comes out with what he wants his congregation to hear.

From what I've heard, the Muslim ministers do the same thing.

Why isn't there just one bible that everyone reads? He provides bibles in the pews in case you forgot yours that day but, what version are you reading?? Which of the 19 versions is he sending out?

Just saying a man is a Christian doesn't mean a whole lot, kind of like the variations of the Kuran that the Muslim countries are sending out. If they're radical, they send out one version, non-radical, another.. or at least another interpretation.

Last but certainly not least, we're reading a bible that has been transcribed into different meaning for over 2000 years now. What did the original version actually have to say?

Everyone thinks we can take out this Muslim race easily.. Did you know Muslim families produce in the neighborhood of 8 children where Christian families produce about 1.5 children?

Whatever you decide, you better act soon or they're going to own everything and outnumber us well over 4 to 1.

Then you have weird statistics like every one of the guy that caused 9-11 were from Saudi, so where do we put our troops as a FOB to attach Saddam and Osama?? Saudi Arabia..

Best advice is to arm yourself. Don't be a statistic like those in Orlando, Paris, and Turkey like those that have become victims in the past month.. Okk, and don't forget, leading the body count for this month.. is Baghdad itself. They're killing their own people.

The only answer is a well armed militia because whether anyone wants to admit it or not, they've killed over 300 this month alone and our Christians.... Well, have they killed anyone this month??

 

You're right... There are indeed several versions of the Christian Bible but the difference between them is very slight. Most translations are from original texts. The translators use modern words and synonyms that make very little change to the actual meaning of the original verse.... But there are original versions of the Bible which can be used to compare the others to make sure they are true to the Origial... and The advantage to having many translations is that you can read several and see which one expresses the idea best for you.

The Koran is the same as far as translations are concerned but there is no such thing as a moderate Koran or an extremist Koran. The Koran is basically the same in all its translations. The difference is in the people. How devote they are and how much they take the Koran to heart and are ready, willing and able do what it tells them to do.

There are many differences between the religion of the Koran and the Bible but from a political point of view, the chief difference between them is that the Bible does not tell its followers that God wants them to Kill, rape, plunder, loot, torture and take into slavery anyone who will not convert.... not does it promise a reward for doing these things.

No it will not be easy to take out the Radical Moslems but it’s very doable. If we put our minds to it and treat them as we did the Nazis during WW2 we can make short work of them. As for the rest of the Moslems, most Moslems are illiterate, poorly educated, and economically distressed with poorly organized and equipped military. Though there are 1.5 Billion of them in the world, most Moslems will not have any interest in engaging in war with us unless they are attacked and of course it will be the Radical Moslems that will attack them.

When that happens we can ask permission to go in and kill the Radicals. If they say yes we can go in to seek out and destroy the radicals and the rest of the population will not offer any resistance. I would say that once we take out the Radicals and knock out their leadership and financing, there will not be much fight left in the rest of the population. Just promise to leave them alone and they’ll be satisfied. Of course that means we'll actually have to leave them alone and that would be best for all.

I think you’re right, we do need to act soon before they become more entrenched.

 

And what about the countries sponsoring terrorism?
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, etc.
Corporate sponsors of terrorism?
Clerics?
Corporations, and countries buying terrorist supplied oil from the black market?
Cut off the head, the body slowly dies. Or at the least approaches terminal.
It's time those sponsoring murder, face the product they promote themselves.

 

Far past time to level all playing fields.

 

Japan's top court has approved blanket surveillance of the country's Muslims
'They made us terrorist suspects, we never did anything wrong,' says Japanese Muslim, Mohammed Fujita..

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...op-court-green-lit-islamaphobia-a7109761.html

 

SYRIAN REFUGEE ASSAULTS GIRL, 13, AT BOSTON POOL
If you think Muslim sex attacks at public swimming pools are only happening in Europe, think again.


http://www.infowars.com/syrian-refugee-assaults-girl-13-at-boston-pool/

 

France is 'on the verge of a civil war' which could be sparked by a mass sexual assault on women by migrants, intelligence chief warns.


A total of 147 people were murdered by terrorists in the capital during atrocities in January and November.Many of those responsible were French passport holders with North African backgrounds, leading to far-Right politicians calling for a massive clampdown on immigration.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-women-migrants-intelligence-chief-warns.html

 

Left-wing German politician who was raped by migrants admits she LIED to police about her attackers' nationality because she did not want to encourage racism.

Selin Gören, the national spokeswoman of the left-wing youth movement Solid, was attacked by three men in January in the city of Mannheim where she works as a refugee activist.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ationality-did-not-want-encourage-racism.html


A refugee activist...Anything for the cause, eh?

 

But what about protecting her fellow country-women and warning them about who was actually going around raping women. Didn't they have the right to know the truth?

 

This week the shit may hit the fan.

 

The dude who wears the blue vest (possibly Kevlar) is on $165,000 pa retainer from guess who? Where does he live and with whom?

 

I trust she just laid back and tried to enjoy it.

 

NEWS ABOUT THE FRENCH ISLAMIC TERROR ATTACK.

The driver of the Truck that mowed down dozens of innocent people that were out celebrating a national holiday in France, and who killed over 100, including 10 children, two Americans, and put another 188 in hospitals, with 48 in critical condition and 25 in intensive care. And after his truck was stopped, he continued killing people with his hand gun.

His name? are you ready for it?

A 31-year-old Tunisian man named Mohamed Lahouaiej Boisvert.

And in case his name isn’t enough of a tip-off, according to eyewitnesses, his last words were, as he continued killing people with a handgun… “Allahu Akbar”

At that point French police opened fire and killed him.

French authorities are treating the incident as just “an attack.” However French President François Hollande went further and declared it an “undeniable terrorist attack.” but refused to put that word “Islamic” in front of the word “terrorist” from fear of offending the local Moslems and the Liberal Press.

It has also been reported (by unreliable sources) that some American members of the BLM organization are calling for a full investigation, alleging the police used excessive force.