Say anon, did you see this?
If true, your man and his kid are gonna have some explaining to do, eh?
And perhaps the FBI has some explaining to do as well, eh?

We keep telling despicables three fundamental facts of life;
Be careful what you wish for
Karma is a bitch
The coverup is always more damaging than the original crime.​

Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, Hunter (msn.com)

Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, Hunter
Story by Brooke Singman • Yesterday 3:20 PM


Sen. Chuck Grassley said Monday that the Burisma executive who allegedly paid Joe Biden and Hunter Biden kept 17 audio recordings of his conversations with them as an "insurance policy," citing the FBI FD-1023 form that the bureau briefed congressional lawmakers on.

Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed from the Senate floor Monday what was said to be a redacted reference in the FBI-generated FD-1023 form alleging a criminal bribery scheme between then-Vice President Joe Biden and a foreign national that involved influence over U.S. policy decisions.

Fox News Digital exclusively reported on the contents of the form last week. The FD-1023 form, dated June 30, 2020, is the FBI's interview with a "highly credible" confidential source who detailed multiple meetings and conversations he or she had with a top Burisma executive over the course of several years, starting in 2015. Fox News Digital has not seen the form, but it was described by several sources who are aware of its contents.

Grassley said the FD-1023 has a redacted reference that the Burisma executive possesses fifteen audio recordings of phone calls between himself and Hunter Biden.

According to Grassley, the FD-1023 also states that the executive possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between himself and then-Vice President Joe Biden.

The recordings were allegedly kept as an "insurance policy" for the foreign national in case he was in some type of "tight spot," a source told Fox News Digital.

The FD-1023 also alleges that then-Vice President Joe Biden may have been involved in Burisma bringing his son, Hunter Biden, onto the board.

The FBI brought the document to Capitol Hill last week after House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer subpoenaed it. The FBI briefed Comer and committee Ranking Member Jamie Raskin, D-Md., on the form. The FBI later brought the form to a secure setting on Capitol Hill for all Oversight Committee members to view.

 

Just like with Trump's 2020 election fraud. Trump is having trouble just finding a good lawyer to defend him.

 

The deplorables are all for weaponization of the Feds?? Have you been following the Blinken "Hunters laptop is a Russian disinformation plot"? Or do your handlers not let you read anything they have not provided to you?
You can read, right?​

Hunter Biden investigation: Blinken may have played a bigger role in letter to discredit laptop (msn.com)


Washington Examiner
Hunter Biden investigation: Blinken may have played a bigger role in letter to discredit laptop
Story by Jerry Dunleavy • Yesterday 7:03 PM


Hunter Biden investigation: Blinken may have played a bigger role in letter to discredit laptop© Provided by Washington Examiner
Secretary of State Antony Blinken may have played a larger role than previously known in creating a letter in October 2020 that was used by Joe Biden to shut down negative stories about his son Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop.

Congressional testimony released Monday provided new details on Blinken's involvement in bringing more than 50 ex-intelligence officials to sign a letter suggesting Hunter Biden laptop stories were nothing but a product of Russian disinformation — a baseless narrative seized upon by the
The testimony revealed that James Clapper, a former director of national intelligence under President Barack Obama, told House investigators that former Obama CIA director John Brennan, another laptop letter signer, told him “that Tony Blinken had reached out to Michael [Morell] about putting together a public statement.”

The letter from ex-intelligence officials aimed to discredit the New York Post's reporting on Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop hard drive just days before Joe Biden's presidential debate with then-President Donald Trump.

That account from Clapper suggests a more active role for Blinken than Morell, the former acting CIA director under Obama, previously described.

Morell said in a transcribed interview with congressional investigators earlier this year that, before his Oct. 17, 2020, phone call with Blinken, he had no intention to write the Oct. 19 Hunter Biden laptop letter and testified “yes” and “absolutely” when asked if the call with Blinken, who was then a top adviser for Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign, was what “triggered that intent in you.”

The Monday revelations came from a new letter from Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, that contained additional testimony from Clapper hinting that Blinken may have done more than just trigger the letter’s creation.

It was also revealed Monday that Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA operations officer who assisted Morell in drafting the letter, testified to Jordan and Turner that Morell “did mention to me that someone in the kind of Biden world had asked about doing this.”

“Morell said to me that someone from kind of the Bidenworld has asked for this," Polymeropoulos testified. "And he did not tell me who it was or any other kinds of details of it.”

Morell previously testified that it was his “guess” that Blinken called him to talk about the Hunter Biden laptop because the future secretary of state wanted it “out” in public that “the Russians were somehow involved” in the saga.

One of the two reasons Morell said he helped put the letter together was to help now-President Biden defeat Trump.

Blinken himself contended in May that "I didn't — it wasn't my idea, didn't ask for it, didn't solicit it, and I think the testimony that the former deputy director of the CIA, Mike Morrell, put forward confirms that.”

Jordan and Turner had sent Blinken a letter in April asking him to identify everyone with whom he “communicated about the inception, drafting, editing, signing, publishing, or promotion” of the laptop letter and to “produce all documents and communications” related to the laptop letter.

The congressmen said Monday they received a May letter from Blinken’s attorney, but so far, the secretary of state has been "unresponsive to our request.”

Jordan and Turner asked Blinken to hand over the requested material by June 26, warning that “the committees may consider the use of compulsory process if these requests remain outstanding beyond that date.” The compulsory process means Blinken faces the threat of a subpoena.

The duo has unearthed a host of new details about the laptop letter, including that the goal of the letter was to give now-President Joe Biden a “talking point” to deploy against Trump in their final presidential debate.

Jordan and Turner accused Blinken on Monday of setting up a “strawman argument” when his lawyer claimed that he “did not solicit the letter in question.” The congressmen said, “We, however, did not allege in our letter that you solicited the statement” but rather “revealed how your outreach to Mr. Morell set in motion the events that led to the issuance of the public statement.”

Joe Biden pointed to the laptop letter during the Oct. 22, 2020, debate after Trump brought up “the laptop from hell” in reference to Hunter Biden’s lucrative business dealings tied to Ukraine and China.

“There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what he’s accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said that this has all the characteristics — four, five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage,” Joe Biden said.

Trump replied, “You mean the laptop is now another Russia, Russia, Russia hoax?” Joe Biden replied, “That’s exactly what we’re told.” Trump lamented, “Here we go again with Russia.”

Konstantinos "Gus" Dimitrelos, a cyber forensics expert and former Secret Service agent, conducted an examination of the laptop for the Washington Examiner last year, concluding, “My analysis revealed there is a 100% certainty that Robert Hunter Biden was the only person responsible for the activity on this hard drive and all of its stored data,” and that “the hard drive is authentic.”

 

Oh I'm not saying trumptards aren't dumb. But I do think many have a tendency to discount trumptards as naive rubes. But an awful lot of them support Trump with "eyes wide shut"

 

Ah shooters little parrot makes another appearance

 

The rubenesque naivete of Trump supporters is not they think he is an honest or trustworthy person. They know who and what he is. They trip over their own credulity when they think Trump can accomplish the goals he promises.

They are willing to endure appearing stupid to others and being asked, why do you support a liar, a cheat, and a thief because they truly believe Trump will do something they can't actually define in a simple declarative sentence.

 

Triggered

 

Unde3r the general heading of Karma is a real bitch we hear so much around here.

Trump Signed a Law Making Mishandling Classified Docs a Felony

Donald Trump is set to make his first appearance in a Miami federal court Tuesday, facing 37 felony charges related to his alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. But as two viral tweets acknowledged, Trump ironically signed a law in 2018 while president that increased the penalty for “unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material.” Before then, people guilty of the then-misdemeanor crime faced a maximum of one year in prison. After Trump changed it, that max penalty is now five years, making it a felony charge. But it’s not quite relevant to Trump’s federal indictment—he’s not being charged with that specific crime. Instead, he’s being charged under the Espionage Act for his alleged “willful retention of national defense information.”

Read it at KENS5


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump...ng-classified-docs-a-felony?ref=home?ref=home

 

Like I've said, time and again, present your evidence in a court of law, not the court of Republican opinion, and I'll be fine with the outcome. The Republicans throwing their weight and tantrums isn't the way to do it. They are assuming they can use this memo at face value without vetting to smear Biden.

But you're ok with that, I'm sure! You've already made your mind up, you just want to invent some facts to fit your narrative.

It is interesting that the sources for your article are anonymous...

 

With the walls of justice finally closing in on Trump. Trumptards are starting to really experience the fear desperation at losing their beloved Fuhrer.

And just wait for Georgia to indict Trump for voter fraud. That's the most important charge IMO.

 

The rats are jumping the Trump ship left and right.

Alan Dershowitz: Jack Smith's evidence like 'a gun with Trump's fingerprints on it'

David Edwards
June 13, 2023, 3:23 PM ET



Real America's Voice/screen grab


Law professor Alan Dershowitz likened the evidence against former President Donald Trump to a gun with fingerprints.

While speaking to podcaster Charlie Kirk, Dershowitz commented on special counsel Jack Smith's evidence showing Trump mishandled national security documents.

"You have called on this program the most serious of all the potential indictments against Donald Trump," Kirk told Dershowitz. "Do you still feel that way now [after] actually reading the indictment itself?"

"I do, especially the provision in which Donald Trump foolishly waved some paper in front of a reporter while he was being recorded by his own staff," Dershowitz replied, referring to an apparent recording of Trump bragging about having confidential documents.

"And he said, I could have declassified this, but I didn't, so it's still secret," the attorney continued. "And it has to do with a battle attack plan for Iran."

Dershowitz argued that the evidence was not a "smoking gun."

"But it's surely a gun with Trump's fingerprints on it," he added. "And his lawyers will have to explain that away. They may argue, look, it was just puffery. He didn't really show them anything. He just waved it in front of them."

"But it seems like it's an admission that he had material that he knew he had not declassified," Dershowitz remarked.

The longtime attorney said that he would not represent Trump in the documents case because he had already represented him during an impeachment trial.

https://www.rawstory.com/alan-dershowitz-trump-indictment/

 

Do you feel the desperation, the panic, as the walls close in @mstrman ?

 

What, sarcasm offends you?

 

Journalist asks tough question and gets booted from restaurant holding post-arraignment Trump event

Gideon Rubin
June 13, 2023, 9:08 PM ET



Donald Trump speaking with attendees at the "Rally to Protect Our Elections" hosted by Turning Point Action. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)


A journalist was kicked out of a Cuban eatery holding a post-indictment gathering for Donald Trump for shouting a tough question at the ex-president.

The BBC’s Sophie Alexander shared her experience on Twitter in a post that includes video of the exchange in which a crowd boos and shouts expletives at her.

The post also includes a photo of a man she alleges shouted an expletive at her from close range.

Alexander is heard in the video saying, “President Trump, are you ready to go to jail?”

The crowd at Versailles restaurant on Southwest Eighth Street in Miami is seen holding their phones high taking video of the event. Loud boos are heard after Alexander shouts the question at Trump with the former president’s supporters yelling, “Get out, out out…”

“I was just thrown out of the Versailles bakery in Miami for asking President Trump if he was ready to go to jail. A man screamed ‘stupid b-tch’ in my face while others said I was a ‘traitor,'" Alexander tweeted.

IN OTHER NEWS: Here’s what to expect in the classified docs case after Trump’s indictment: report

Trump visited the iconic Cuban restaurant after his arraignment on a 37-count indictment alleging he improperly handled classified documents. The former president pleaded not guilty to all charges.

Trump was expected to be interviewed by social media influencer and Miami-Dade County mayoral candidate Alex Ataloa on YouTube, The Miami Herald reports.

Watch the video of the interaction below or click the following link.

https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-kicks-out-journalist/

 

By now the "whataboutism" has become a liability not a defense. When treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans run around screaming but what about Hillary? What about President Biden? What about Pence what are they NOT saying?

None of them are saying Trump didn't do it. None of them are saying its an incredible threat to national security. None them are saying Trump is not guilty. And by now that is just obvious.

Ex-Federal Prosecutor Says Trump's Big Speech Was 'Just A Straight-Out Confession'
Andrew Weissmann spots a few lines that could be used in court against the former president.



Ed Mazza
Jun 14, 2023, 02:17 AM EDT








Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said Donald Trump’s speech on Tuesday night defending himself after he was indicted on 37 federal charges could come back to haunt him during the trial.

“Part of what he said is just a straight-out confession,” Weissmann told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell. “It’s not a defense. It’s a confession.”

Advertisement

Speaking in Bedminster hours after pleading not guilty, Trump told supporters he had “every right under the Presidential Records Act” to keep the sensitive documents found at his Mar-a-Lago home during an FBI search last summer.

O’Donnell later asked what, specifically, was a confession in Trump’s speech.


“When you are charged with the illegal retention ― the possession, the illegal possession of the documents ― it is not a good idea to say, ‘Hey, you want to know why I took these? Because I could,’” he said. “That is not a defense to that charge. That is an admission to the charge.”

Weissmann, who was part of Robert Mueller’s investigation team, also noted that even if Trump himself doesn’t take the stand during the trial, these and other public statements he made will be admissible in court.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/andrew-weissmann-trump-confession_n_648949f0e4b06725aee32b59

 

The despicables demand not only a perp walk from Trump, but they demand that any who do not join, with passion, the "get Trump no matter what it takes" brigade confess their sins;

"None of them are saying Trump didn't do it. None of them are saying its an incredible threat to national security. None them are saying Trump is not guilty. And by now that is just obvious."
​

The passion stumbler has to get all things conservative has twisted his perceptions so Shooter will try to explain;
1) "Trump didn't do it." No, we don't know if he did it or not, under the law. It now appears that rather than simple possession (as the law specifies) there are other criteria; how many documents. And INTENT. And who discovered them. And we don't know if there are other criteria that haven't been exposed. Also, there's that icky "innocent until proven guilty" concept that we had our collective noses rubbed in when Clinton was in the stocks.
2) "None of them are saying its an incredible threat to national security" Well, forgive us, but we've heard despicable excess enough times in the past to know when the spittle is flying, there's an excellent chance its all exaggerated for the camera.
3) "None them are saying Trump is not guilty" Well, we don't know, do we? Unlike despicables, we're not able to predict the future, nor dare we utter such blasphemy in the face of such passionate hate.
4) "And by now that is just obvious." Well, so was the Steele thingy and the Kavanaugh thingy. You'll grant that you've been wrong enough times that "obvious" in despicable world is always colored by propaganda and lies, so obvious to a despicable where Trump is concerned is not obvious to the rest of the normal world.

Patience, despicables. You've waited 8 years to claim your victory. Don't give up now and fall victim to your own excess and lies. Stay strong. Stay the course. Your reward is coming.

 

The "get Trump no matter what it takes" is your creation.

It's always been known to anyone not stupid enough to fall for Trump's scam, it wouldn't take much to get him. Nowhere near "anything it takes". While he was in office, it took the combined power of the Attorney General and the Senate Majority leader to prevent any gottage.

When the 2020 election forced him out from under the skirts of Barr and McConnell, it was only a matter of time before Trumps innate character flaws exposed him to the legal consequences from which he had been shielded. Trump's only real hope of avoiding those consequences was to die in office, but like everything Trump does, he fucked that up, too.

 

Read again what YOU, Shooter the space alien from Xcebia, wrote...

You are the one threatening to weaponize the government.