The thing is, there is nothing to back up any of Rawsewage's stories.... Must be nice to live in a fantasy world....

 

The dangerous thing about wrong story is that they can make somethin as routine and simple as medicaid recertification reviews sound like a corrupt STATE government payoff scheme when its nothing more than the FEDERAL government requirements put on the states to minimize fraud and abuse.

It usually isn't hard to uncover the rest of the story but it is tedious. Shooter is pretty sure they know it and their readers are at least smart enough to suspect it.

It is revealing though that when these lies are exposed some forum members will still cling to the lie and attack anyone who challenges them.

 

The furor over Trump's indictment and the despicable street dances has brought fresh attention to the Biden/Pence secret documents thingy but also on the Trump/Russia thingy.
You know, the Steele Dossier.
Let's apply the Jack Smith standard to Biden and Hillary Clinton (msn.com)

Washington Examiner
Let's apply the Jack Smith standard to Biden and Hillary Clinton
Story by Elizabeth Stauffer • 3h ago


I read the Department of Justice’s indictment this weekend, and yes, it was a mess. Frankly, one can easily imagine former President Donald Trump ordering the movement of storage boxes from one location to another (and back again) and even waving a “senior military officials’” attack plan in front of a writer for dramatic effect. Reckless? Yes. A violation of the law? Maybe. As corrupt as Hillary Clinton’s mishandling and destruction of classified material? Or the Biden family’s alleged influence-peddling operation? Not by a long shot.

One need not defend Trump’s behavior as outlined in the indictment to point out that the Justice Department’s charges in this case are the result of selective prosecution. Consider, for example, the many cases of rule-bending and breaking that the DOJ has turned a blind eye to at Trump’s expense.

In March 2019, Fox News obtained a copy of an internal FBI chart created during its “Midyear Exam” investigation into Clinton’s use of a private server when she was secretary of state. The following comment appeared next to 18 U.S. Code 793 (f), the section of the statute most applicable to Clinton’s case: “NOTE: DOJ not willing to charge this; only known cases are Military, cases when accused lost the information (e.g. thumb drive sent to unknown recipient at wrong address.)”

Call me crazy, but Clinton’s use of a private server, her subsequent deletion of more than 33,000 emails that were under subpoena with BleachBit, and the destruction of her personal cellphones with hammers sure sound like violations of 18 U.S.C. These measures go well beyond “gross negligence,” which was how then-FBI Director James Comey described Clinton’s actions in the first draft of his exoneration memo. In a later version, at the suggestion of the disgraced Peter Strzok, he downgraded his assessment of her behavior to “extemely careless.”

That same month, the House released transcripts of the 2018 congressional testimonies of former high-ranking DOJ official Bruce Ohr and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

Ohr told lawmakers that when he brought the Steele dossier, a bogus piece of evidence paid for by the Clinton campaign to distract from her email scandal, to then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Page on July 30, 2016, he emphasized that it was opposition research paid for by Clinton and the DNC. He stressed that it was “uncorroborated” and had been compiled by Christopher Steele, a man who “hated” Trump and wanted to prevent him from winning the election.

Nevertheless, the FBI opened the Crossfire Hurricane investigation the next day.

In October 2016, fully aware of the facts, the FBI used the unverified dossier as the basis of its application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court for a warrant to spy on Carter Page, a junior adviser to the Trump campaign. In what journalists call “circular reporting,” the FBI used a Yahoo News article written by Michael Isikoff, who had used Steele as his source, to corroborate the dossier. And knowing this, Comey signed off on the application and two subsequent ones.

In January 2017, Comey met with then-President-elect Trump to brief him on the dossier. He reportedly told Trump it was “unverified” and “salacious.” In other words, the same document the FBI submitted as “verified” to a FISA court three months earlier was presented to Trump as dirty politics.

When the briefing ended, the duplicitous FBI director notified President Barack Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper that Trump had been briefed and he could give CNN the green light to publish the dossier story. They were all in on it.

Lisa Page testified that the DOJ pressured the FBI to scuttle the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. Moreover, Page revealed that when then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein appointed special counsel Robert Mueller in May 2017, the FBI had no evidence that Trump had colluded with the Russians to win the election. Nor had they been able to corroborate any of the claims made in the dossier.

The DOJ’s documented wrongdoing in the Russiagate case is vital to understanding the current case against Trump. It is no coincidence the Trump indictment was announced the same day that members of the House Oversight Committee viewed the FD-1023 form in which a highly credible and well-paid FBI confidential human source detailed allegations that President Joe Biden had taken a $5 million bribe from an executive at Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings in exchange for policy decisions during his vice presidency.

Sources told the Washington Examiner that an FBI record reveals the executive was Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky, Burisma’s owner. Zlochevsky offered Hunter Biden a highly paid seat on its board of directors in April 2014 while his father was serving as Obama’s “point man” in Ukraine.

The Washington Examiner also reported that Zlochevsky referred to Joe Biden in his conversation with the informant by a familiar nickname: “the big guy.”

Sources who viewed the document told Fox News that the Ukrainian executive, now believed to be Zlochevsky, had paid “$5 million for one Biden, $5 million for the other Biden.”

In other words, a corruption case against the Biden family is on the verge of exploding. These are serious, damning allegations that, if proven, could cost the president much more than reelection.

No wonder Democrats are going scorched-earth on Trump.

 

Course, we'll have to take her word for it cause, you know, no records
​

Of course, Hillary hid and destroyed public records. (msn.com)

Washington Examiner
Of course, Hillary hid and destroyed public records.
Opinion by Timothy P. Carney • Yesterday 7:50 PM



Of course, Hillary hid and destroyed public records.© Provided by Washington Examiner
The most famous chant at Donald Trump rallies in 2016 was “Lock Her Up! Lock Her Up!” The Her was Hillary Clinton, and the crime was her deliberate effort to skirt public records laws.

It is certainly ironic, if unsurprising, that a man who won the White House on a campaign against public records scofflaws has been caught apparently violating public records laws and trying to cover it up. But if you go online and mention the parallels between Clinton’s misdeeds and Trump’s misdeeds, be prepared for some screeching, but also some very specific denials.

The frequency of this flat assertion makes me think that some people missed or forgot some of the story of Hillary Clinton’s secret email.

Clinton created a private email server and made the decision to conduct all of her official business on an email address on that server rather than on the State.gov server. She didn’t tell the government authorities about this, and despite being required to get permission, she never asked permission.

This illegal and secret arrangement allowed Hillary to determine which of her emails should be considered public records. Just as Donald Trump doesn’t get to determine which records are personal and which are presidential records, Hillary wasn’t legally allowed to make that determination about her Secretary of State records. So it’s pretty clear she set up a system with the intention of breaking the law by hiding official records from the authorities.

She then broke the law by hiding and attempting to hide official records from authorities. She instructed her lawyers to delete tens of thousands of her emails which she swore up and down were personal, not public records. Luckily the DOJ was able to undelete some of those emails and found that contrary to her promises, some of the emails she deleted were public records.

We should, of course, assume that the permanently deleted emails included public records. There’s no reason to believe otherwise. This is also why the government doesn’t let officials be their own judges of which emails are public records. In my opinion, it's also exactly why Hillary really wanted to host her own emails.

Are Trump’s actions worse? Maybe! In some ways yes, and in some ways no. Should either or both have been prosecuted? That’s a very complicated question.

What’s not complicated is this: Hillary Clinton deliberately hid and destroyed public records.

 

Editorially, the Washington Examiner is 100% right. It is virtually impossible to find a single editorial that offers balance

So just more trumptard Momo jumbo

 

Would you believe it if wrong story reported it?

 

Yepperd wr can always tell whenn something has @shootersa triggered when he has to post off topic a pathetic attemp to try and distract deflect and derail. I wondef what it is.

 

I bet this is it.

 

5 years later and still the American hater clings to the Steele Dossier like a talisman.

 

https://forum.xnxx.com/threads/once-and-for-all-the-steele-dossier.667600/

 

Sorry.
Not talisman.
Fetish.

 

Says a trumptard who watched his president and party try to overturn an election. Now that's the sign of someone who truly hates America.

 

You wouldn't know how to love America or know a patriot if one introduced themselves to you.

Your endless yammering about all things trump is tiresome, unproductive, and based on propaganda.

Dismissed.

 

Coming from the space alien who finds nothing wrong in human trafficking for political ends... Yeah, "he" knows patriotism! Pfft!

All he knows is how to troll, troll, troll!

And you being tired of hearing about Trump? Really? Poor little snowflake space alien is melting! Now he's just a puddle of mud.

You're just tired of finding new ways of defending Trump. It has reached the point that the Republicans are actually OPENLY throwing tantrums getting names for Trump so he has a list to fire his first day.

Funny you've got no opinions on that.

Dismissed, my ass!

Coward, is more like it.

 

Exactly. While over on the Russia thtead he is pushing pro Putin false propananda

 

You are indeed a fucking liar.