The post-truth era of Trump is just what Nietzsche predicted

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/official-fbi-backs-cia-conclusion-194526659.html

Official: FBI backs CIA conclusion on Russian hacking motive



WASHINGTON (AP) — The FBI is supporting the CIA's conclusion that Russia interfered in the presidential election with the goal of supporting Republican candidate Donald Trump.

In a message sent to employees, CIA Director John Brennan said he had spoken with FBI Director James Comey and James Clapper, the director of national intelligence.

Brennan said in the message that "there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election."

A U.S. official who had seen the unclassified message from Brennan confirmed it to The Associated Press on Friday.

President Barack Obama is promising that the U.S. will retaliate against Russia for its suspected meddling in America's election process, an accusation the Kremlin has vehemently denied.

 

A message from Red State America to the libs....

DO NOT steal this election via your harassment of the members of the Electoral College or via some other nonsense.

 

If the majority of the House can find common ground on anything, the impeachment can begin.

Apparently I am more objective to all issues than you are, it doesn't matter what I beleive, it has not been proven yet. When it is proven, then and only then we can talk about it.

You do know, the CIA has no authority to investigate shit ..domestically.

This witch hunt is nothing more then that...a witch hunt. Total speculation.

Hillary's Server Hacked After All? FBI Docs Reveal A File From Hillary's Server Was Found In Romania

FBI Investigators “99% sure” 5 Foreign Intelligence Agencies Hacked Clinton’s Private Server. Hillary Clinton has a lot of explaining to do!

You sound offended, is that the case here?

Yeah I think that is the case, you leftists can run all over XNXX make the false claim about Putin and the Russian hacking E-mails and influencing the election process, yet, when it comes to a hypothetical like an impeachment process....you sure do go on the offensive.

Your forum life is irrelevant, you have been proven on several occassions to be noncredible, as a matter of fact, it has been done in this very thread.

Settle down....Jo-jo will be leaving the forum again...soon

 

I assume that you're talking to a certain Iggy-fied asshole. Because otherwise this post makes zero sense to me.

I'm not going anywhere, Ace.





At least not until next Tuesday.

 

Most of my posts make zero sense to everyone...it's a curse I have.

 

Sounds like you have hope for it to happen...

 

Sounds like you're unwilling to even look to see if there is reason to prove anything.

 

Yes, Dr. Freud. It is you that sounds off ended...

 

C U Next Tuesday...

 

Not so much.

No I'm not.

The facts are clear, the leaked e-mails were icing on the cake, proving that Clinton was not the best candidate for the position of POTUS.

Nothing in the e-mails indicate that the e-mails were lies or false.

Clinton used the political positions for personal gain, whether it was monetary gain, or personal vindictiveness, or out and out incompetency.

Also proving that Clinton is morally bankrupt.

Whether or not Russia was involved, let alone Putin, has not yet been proven or determined, when it is proven that, that is the case, then we can talk about it.

 

Not one mother fucker on this site is capable of getting within a mile of my head...well, there was this one woman, that had an awesome set of titties....I MEAN AWESOME.

 

And there is no proof that you will accept. Thus you will not "even look to see if there is reason to prove anything"!

You've spent 30 years with your nose up the Clinton's ass... I'm sure you can stand a couple of years, give or take, with it up Trump's...

 

A Democratic elector in Washington state said Friday that he would not cast his Electoral College vote for Hillary Clinton if, as is likely, she wins the state in Tuesday's election. ... "She will not get my vote, period," he said in a phone interview with The Associated Press.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ot-voting-clinton_us_581d145ae4b0d9ce6fbc3941

 

Anyone catch Moochelle's interview? Where she tries to explain that "hope and change" weren't just words to win an election? That they meant something? Something like "make America great again?"

But now she's no longer proud to be an American?

Moochele sounds an embittered, snivelling, whiny little gash, actually.

By the way all the bickering about impeachment is rather funny, given the news that was unfolding while you guys were all arguing about it. Lots of tinfoil nuts have called for Obama's impeachment in the past eight years, but the notion was never really dignified by anyone with the ability to move the needle.

But now we have the specter of Senator Lizzie "Spreading Bull" Warren calling for Trump's impeachment and vowing to add ethics legislation that will give the initiative teeth.

You heard that right. The tenured Harvard Law professor and senator is going to invent a new law that she can use to depose the president of the United States.

And the dumb injun squaw fraud is going to do this to restore America's standing in the world and preserve the integrity of the republic.

You can't make this stuff up. Unhinged. That's the word.

 

Proof is proof...Consensus is not proof.

Where has my nose been for the past 30 years?

 

Nope, didn't catch that Michelle interview, I must have been poopin' at the time.

As for Lizzy squaw.....she's just another Comminist.

 

Agreed.

Her shit plays well within a five mile radius of Harvard. But she'll be scalped if she shows her filthy mug anywhere else in the country.

I only brought it up to show that the "Impeachment Strategy" is real, contrary to Stumbler's claims.

Personally I do not think it will go that far. Trump will not face impeachment, because he will not be inaugurated. That is still my prediction.

 

I really don't have to go past that first highlight to prove you are just bullshitting out your ass and dodging a very simple question in your usual cowardly way.

The fact that our intelligence agencies are on the record saying Putin/Russia hacked the DNC with the intent to influence the presidential election in favor or Trump and Putin's denial of that is not some hypothetical or some accusation that has to be proven. That is absolute fact and happen just within the past few days. That is reality.

So once again Ace/M4M who do you believe? Our intelligence agencies or Putin?

And let's look at what your source for Clinton's email server being hacked really says.

http://www.redflagnews.com/headline...ile-from-hillarys-server-was-found-in-romania

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...l-confidential-file-was-found-romanian-server

Now first you prove you are such a phony liar claiming you are "objective" and want proof of something that has actually already happened. And then you turn right around and with your usual tricks posting only part of a source to try and contend there is "proof" Clinton's email server was hacked when your own source says no such thing and is simply speculating. What a laughable fraud you are.

FBI director says Guccifer admitted he lied about hacking Hillary Clinton's email

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/guccifer-clinton-server-hack-lie/

 

Did not Trump refer to Putin hacking Clinton's email during the election campaign?

Thinskin