Every time you or your sock post something...yes.

 

Stumbles, I really gotta say...Anyone who can try to reasonably claim that ace's & I are the same person, and then stick with it as consistently as you have, (despite the fact that I'm quite certain that you are the only person who believes it), is in no position to call someone stupid. Yeah, I'm sure you'll tell me that a half dozen or more people have agreed with you privately, but we both know that wouldn't be true.

Actually, I've had you on Ignore. But speaking of "as usual", YOUR "as usual" has never been a problem for me. Those are the "usual" instances where, no matter what someone else posted (someone you disagree with politically), when you find a link that supports your point and contradicts theirs, you're not just right, the other person is a liar (along with your "as usual" inclusions of "hack" and what not.) In my case, not just a hack, but "a paid, phony PR hack". As if someone would pay others to come to XNXX, of all places (No offense, nophest.), a place where most members had never heard of, and only landed here by chance of clicking one of the 500K links that were in the Google result set that matched whatever type of porn they were looking for that day/night/morning/eve/twilight. But hey, I did take it as a compliment that I was a "paid" hack. So, I must be pretty good at it to keep earning those paychecks, right? (But I digress.)

Honestly though, I did get a kick out of it at first, thinking it was a "You're all alike" kind of thing, like when anon uses the term "connies". But on a more serious note. I'm not asking you to believe me. What I'm saying is, if you're convinced that ace's & I are one and the same, you've got bigger problems than political arguments in an anonymous forum. So, you can call it running away. I'll stick with "not wasting my time with someone not connected to reality."


Happy Hump Day!

 

Or more to the point, the right has spent years making claims of lies from the left, all while working to bury those coming from their own ranks...

 

Spin it how you like you shit stain!
The majority did not want Bill or Donnie, but they got the electoral vote!
Now you have to live in Donnie's world! Lmao!!

 

Shooter explained all this before; apparently Stumbler didn't get the message. Shooter will once again explain.

When Trump announced his candidacy, the Republicans sighed and reminded him that the field was already crowded. The Democrats hooted with glee.
When Trump made his outrageous statements, the Republicans nodded sagely and said "well, that takes care of him" and the Democrats frothed and ranted that Trump was horrible for saying such nasty things.
When Trump's numbers kept climbing the wide swath of truck driving, beer drinking, gun toting, genetically ambiguous, hard working AMERICAN red necks started paying attention. How, they asked, is he doing that?
Then Hillary arrogantly jumped in with her "Trump supporters are deplorable" crap and that wide swath of truck driving, beer drinking, gun toting, genetically ambiguous, hard working AMERICAN red necks woke up and shouted "ENOUGH!! JUST EFUCKINGNOUGH!!"

And they voted Donald Trump into office.

Mind you, they were voting against Hillary, not for Trump, but the outcome was the same; Trump is a pompous gas bag, but the alternative was unacceptable to that wide swath of truck driving, beer drinking, gun toting, genetically ambiguous, hard working AMERICAN red necks. You know, the "deplorables" who would dare to even think of supporting Trump; the "loosers" who would dare even dream of an America without Queen Hillary at the helm.

The point is, Trump, with help from Hillary, started a revolution. Neither of them set out to do that, and certainly Trump is not the leader of the revolution. He is as much a casualty of the revolution as Hillary. Unless, that is, he has his poop in a group and does his job.

Trump is irrelevant. Hillary is irrelevant. The robbers in Washington are irrelevant because they won't survive the next election.

That wide swath of truck driving, beer drinking, gun toting, genetically ambiguous, hard working AMERICAN red necks realized that a) Our elected representatives in Washington, and across America at the state and local level are, for the most part, robbers and villains. When our so called "servants of the people" can increase their net worth ten fold in only a few terms while the rest of us find it daily more difficult to make ends meet the only conclusion is that they aren't taking care of our business, they are taking care of their business.
When the "servants of the people" have a pension plan far better than Social Security, and then have the brass to continually raid Social Security to fund their government largess, it is clear they give not one shit about America.
When the "servants of the People" have a medical plan unlike anything else available to Americans and then dare to jam socialized fucked up "Obamacare" down Americans throats, it is clear that some house cleaning is called for.
The revolution will see them to the door next election.

So, to answer your question?
Do Trump "supporters" not care that Donald Lies?
The question is irrelevant.
Trump will either do the job or he will be voted out.

And as for the Trump "unsupporters", they have two choices;
Join the revolution and stop worrying about Trump and his lies
Or
Keep yapping, nominate Hillary (or her clone) in four years, and get another unpleasant surprise.

 

Because nothing says "No appearance of impropriety here" like hiring the very person suspected of allegedly rigging the primaries in your favor, 10 minutes after she's forced to resign under a cloud of suspicion.

 

That's nothing like hiring a Secretary of State who stands to make a billion dollars if he can get sanctions against Russia reversed.

 

We already had a Secretary of State get a billion dollars and she didn't have worry about Russian sanctions.

 

You might wanna pay a little closer attention yourself. He put "unpresidented" instead of "unprecedented".

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/17/trump-trolled-for-misspelling-unprecedented-in-tweet.html

 

You sure wasted a lot of time, effort, and hysteria on something I have already answered.

 

Love it. He's a chump for not seeing a story that had the political impact of a "yawn", but you're not, when you go on to describe it completely back-asswards where, in your explanation, it could have been attributed to auto-correct, because precedent and president can be found in any dictionary,. where as "unpresidented" won't be (with the exception of urbandictionary.com, where it was added that day.)

(And it was "un", not "ly.)

Ah, the tolerant Left.