One thing at a time............if they have spoken to the Russians then the next question is were they party to Russian interference in your election because that is treason!

Thinskin

 

Well if that's true, Trump and you have something in common....

 

I have yet to see evidence of any Russian interference with regards to the 2016 presidential election.

If there was any, don't you think the Democrats would have been able to provide some little bit of proof or evidence?

I know, in their small weak little closed mind, they know it happen, they just can't come up with any proof....

 

My personal opinion is a lot of people are sitting on a lot of dirt and the release of said dirt will only be as and when it is required!

My personal opinion!!

Thinskin

 

Do you have a chiropractor on hand? That spin had to give you whiplash!

 

Lookit!
A Trump unuspporter making noise about "spin"
The dictionary has a brand new definition of Irony.

 

OMG I can't believe it but you actually got one thing right. There are some far fetched claims that Flynn violated the Logan Act but since there has never really been a prosecution under the Logan Act there isn't much chance of Flynn being prosecuted for it.

But Flynn didn't just admit it. He lied about it which brought the DOJ in with fears Flynn could be vulnerable to Russian blackmail because he lied.

And now Trump keeps getting caught telling really stupid lies about it as well and that is what can sink him just like it Flynn.

I also, however, have to throw in another caveat. Flynn was also interviewed by the FBI and if he lied to them he could very well be prosecuted for that.

Well there you go right back to being stupid. One because there is lots and lots of evidence already posted on this thread. But also because you don't have to take the Democrats word for it. You can take Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's word for it.

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/mitch-mcconnell-russia-hacking-morning-joe-interview-235034
]

 

There is a new story out today that US intelligence isn't the only ones who have evidence of members of Trump's campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence prior to the election. There are also several other nations who intercepted calls between Trump's campaign and Russian intelligence and they might be even more willing to release the transcripts.

 

And what have I spun? Not the mainstream media, not the left, but me. Seriously, answer the question or shut your blow hole!

 

If this is screct, what is it doing all over the news and TV?

 

Well it looks like there will be an investigation now there is cross party sponsorship for it!

http://usuncut.com/politics/republican-breaks-party/

Thinskin

 

And Trump sure didn't help himself yesterday during his 77 incoherent rant. He kept contradicting himself of Flynn, spouted the impossible like the leaks were real but the stories about the leaks were fake, and worst of all repeatedly dodged questions about whether or not members of his campaign were in contact with Russia prior to the election. That just rained down more suspicion and commentary about his obvious lies.

 

did you listen to the press conference....

 

When are you "intelligent' people going to accept the fact you are being played by Obama left overs and nothing you read about the Russians and President Trump has any veracity what so ever.?

 

So... No veracity?

Why did Flynn resign?

 

Hoping for a possible pardon from Trump, maybe!
Or .....................
A chance to escape a sinking ship!
He could have been trying to grab the only life preserver available. Pun intended!

 

Yes I did actually did watch Trump's press conference and noticed the same things almost everyone else noticed. Trump was unhinged. He told stupid lies only to get busted on them right then and there. He blustered without actually answering questions. And proved beyond reasonable doubt he is in fact and in deed a racist.

 

‘Demonstrably, unquestionably, 100 percent false!’: Shep Smith eviscerates Trump’s lie-filled presser

 

I know you're real fond of that usuncut.com website, but do you think they might be a teensy more biased than the usual left-leaning or right-leaning news organizations?

For instance, their front page doesn't have one non-Trump story.



Then, you see the 6 menu options?

News:



Politics:



Resistance:



World:



Class War and Black Lives Matter are the only ones that aren't entirely Trump. (But still include some Trump)





I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that a site that is so singly focused just MIGHT have an agenda.