1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice

  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
PM change Verification
Page 4 of 4
  1. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Jun 25, 2018
    First of all, your new habit of not quoting people makes it virtually impossible to follow your conversation, so I've no idea where this adoption angle comes from.

    Second, you are making false equivelances...
     
    #61
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Jun 25, 2018
    Look, you asked the question; who were the American kids Shooter thought deserved our sympathy.
    Shooter answered.
    You didn't like the answer, so now you're diverting.
    Or trying to.

    Shooter will wait for you to deal with the earlier questions and issues posed.
    Meanwhile, take your seat in the peanut gallery with the General.
    It's obvious you have no clue what you're spewing about.
     
    #62
  3. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Jun 25, 2018
    Ok, never mind...
     
    #63
  4. conroe4

    conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,760
    Jun 25, 2018
    Dang, Shooter's been down that road first hand. He KNOWs the adoption system better
    than anyone who hasn't dealt with the system...yet they argue. WOW. why bother?
     
    1. tenguy
      That almost read like a shootersa post, you know, third person and all.
       
      tenguy, Jun 25, 2018
      #link
    #64
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Jun 26, 2018
    Shooter still wants to know the generals source to support his allegation that immigrant kids "snatched from their mothers arms and tossed into cages" are already being adopted.

    Cause shorter knows it is a fucking lie.

    And shooter wants Anon, the general and bron to flatly state whether immigrant kids "torn from the arms of their mothers" should garner more of our sympathy and outrage than the plight of American kids "torn from the arms of their mothers.

    Not that they will answer or take a position (other than hate trump....... cause trump).

    Wait for it......
     
    #65
  6. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Jun 26, 2018
    Asked and answered. Not my problem you don't like or accept the answer...
     
    1. shootersa
      And there it is. The non answer.
       
      shootersa, Jun 26, 2018
      #link
    2. anon_de_plume
      Just because you don't like it doesn't make it a non-answer. You should except such things when you give a false equivelance!
       
      anon_de_plume, Jun 26, 2018
      #link
    #66
  7. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Jun 26, 2018
    You asked the question.
    Shooter answered.
    You didn't like the answer.
    So you diverted.
    Peanut gallery on the left.
     
    #67
  8. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Jun 26, 2018
    Um, you were the one asking questions! But who cares, right!
     
    #68
  9. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,659
    Jun 26, 2018
    The quality of mercy is not strained. This has nothing to do with lumpy mercy.

    There is more than enough sympathy to go around for American kids and immigrant kids, alike. It is strange to see the abuse of immigrant families defended by pointing out how poorly we treat citizen children in this country. An extreme case of poor salesmanship for the American way of life, certainly.

    But, in shooter's defense, he doesn't have much to sell, when the product is a President who can't speak the truth, and will not listen when the truth is spoken to him. There really isn't a valid defense for lying, so fabricating a case of hypocrisy for not caring about all children is probably as much as we can expect.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. View previous comments...
    2. Bron Zeage
      Extremely poor salesmanship, but why change a losing strategy when all the others just lose faster.
      Is there some hierarchy of compassion which dictates someone must be at the end of the line?
      Are some children more deserving of compassion than others? What's the criteria?

      If you really like inflicting pain and misery on immigrant families as a disincentive, just own up to it. Don't act as if you care about native born children and compound the mendacity.
       
      Bron Zeage, Jun 26, 2018
      #link
      anon_de_plume likes this.
    #69
  10. deleted user 777 698

    deleted user 777 698 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2015
    Messages:
    8,747
    Jun 26, 2018
    Yet President Trump has another vindication today. From the highest court in the land, no less. We love it when common sense prevails.
     
    #70
Page 4 of 4