1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. JimmyCrackPorn

    JimmyCrackPorn Porn Star

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2017
    Messages:
    5,240
    kavanaugh feel like duke lacrosse player - kelly.jpg
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    The bullshit is on Trump and the Republicans trying to keep Ford at every disadvantage they can to keep the truth from coming out.

    But it's looking more likely they are going to have to back down.
     
  3. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,859
    You are right. Witnesses do not have the power to dictate terms under which they will testify. Ford if a fraud, this is just another stall tactic by the D.C. Democrat clown show...

    Ford has no intentions of speaking before the senate...
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. conroe4

    conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    26,760
    Nope, you can't have a fair trial based on one's terms.

    That was directed at Stumbles...not you CS. You snuck in front of me :)
     
  5. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,859
    She will have every advantage granted to her as any other person testifying before the senate. She will not be treated special....

    The only people that think she is special are the clowns of the D.C. Democrat circus.....
     
  6. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    No the whole country can see what a sham set up this is. Ford comes forward and 48 hours later Grassley is issuing ultimatums and setting an entirely arbitrary deadline with no investigation or allowing additional witnesses.

    And right now that is not aging well.
     
  7. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,859
    48 hours bullshit..... Ford has had 35 years..... She is a fraud and will be a no show as expected....

    Ford is a liar, she knows she will be under oath and doesn't want to get caught committing perjury.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. naughtyguy4u

    naughtyguy4u Traveling Vaginal Dilator Therapist

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2016
    Messages:
    3,997
    Where is the outcry for Keith Ellison's head?

    At least his accuser shows up with more than hearsay.

    Are you Dem's going to have him removed????

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  9. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Well no the clock starts when she made the decision to come forward. Not before. And if it wasn't Trump and the corrupt Republicans the first thing they would have done is sent the FBI TO investigate the claims. Just like they have done in the past so just postponing the hearing for a few more days is perfectly reasonable and has to beg the question what are they so afraid of? The truth coming out.
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. imported__2355
      It was held back because Kavenaugh's accuser has the right to her own anonymity while her allegations are investigated. Instead her identity was leaked for political reasons and her safety has reportedly been compromised. In addition, Republicans want no investigation and a quick hearing on their terms so they can confirm him. Why the rush to judgement? The Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings took 3 days after an FBI investigation.
       
      imported__2355, Sep 21, 2018
    3. shootersa
      The vote was scheduled.
      The hearings were over.
      Feinstein had ample opportunity to raise the issue, privately with kavanaugh or during the meetings and did not.
      It became an issue only when it was clear how the vote would go.
      Sleazy underhanded politics.
      Delay for investigation is just more of the same shit.
      Fuck it.
      Vote.
       
      shootersa, Sep 21, 2018
    4. imported__2355
      Not relevant. The issue was being turned over to the FBI as part of their background investigation when it was leaked and Republicans objected to having it investigated in the normal way. Grassley said his own staff could investigate the matter violating normal procedure. Very sleezy and underhanded Republican political maneuvers. Vote Independent.
       
      imported__2355, Sep 21, 2018
    5. shootersa
      You do know this was leaked by Feinstein right?
      That was political.
      Mrs. Ford, once she wrote the letter and it became public, has no right to anonymity, unless that is, she wanted to withdraw the letter.

      Oh, and Kavanaugh's wife and kids have also been threatened.
      Course, that doesn't get the same attention, cause, she married a serial rapist, didn't she?

      The Democrats and Feinstein own this entire circus and will have to accept the consequences. Grassley should call the vote on Monday. Neither the Democrats, Feinstein, or Mrs. Ford get to dictate how this plays out now.
       
      shootersa, Sep 21, 2018
      mrman1959 likes this.
    6. imported__2355
      The vote hadn't happened except in the Republicans' minds. The hearings were being delayed while the FBI was supposed to redo their investigation. Ford leaked her own identity to the Washington Post. Her home address was leaked by an alt-right Twitter account. Neither one was leaked by Fienstien. Now Grassley wants Ford questioned by an outside council, preferably a woman, so he and the other Republicans on the Judiciary Committee won't have to do it. But every Republican there has made statements showing they've pre-judged the outcome and that they will name Kavenaugh to the Court no matter what. With no statue of limitations on this kind of felony in Maryland where it is alleged to have happened, Ford could file charges there at any time. And Trump cant pardon state charges. How would Kavenaugh's arrest look on November 8th?
       
      imported__2355, Sep 21, 2018
  10. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Yes indeed, the entire country can see what a sham this is.
    The vote was set before this circus was started by the Democrats.
    Grassley has bent over double, on his knees, for Mrs. Ford and her attorneys, and still they make demands aimed only at delaying the vote.

    If Grassley bends, he will be soundly criticized.

    Have the vote.
    No matter what, this will cost Democrats at mid terms.
     
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    One thing Grassley, The Republicans, and Trump supporters cannot answer is what possible difference can it make if they hold their committee vote Monday or just some day later in the week?

    No difference at all. Which is how we know they are just rushing this through and not giving Ford a reasonable amount of time to respond.
     
    1. tenguy
      She has had 35 years.
       
      tenguy, Sep 20, 2018
  12. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    What difference would holding the vote up a couple of days make?
    Is new evidence going to appear that Mrs. Ford was groped by Kavanaugh over 35 years ago?
    Is Mrs. Ford going to gain more composure?
    Is it going to be any less painful for her (or judge Kavanaugh) on Monday than it will be on Thursday?
    Will new "victims" appear suddenly, you know, "victims" that are credible?
    Will Democrats find some other trumped up (pun intended) reason to delay the vote?

    No?
    Then fucking vote.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,576
    Quite likely. Let's wait and see.
     
  14. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    NOW... I know why I never opened this thread..., mostly bullshit.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    !no means maybe?
    How about yes means forever be looking over your shoulder.....
     
  16. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,576
    Thank you. :)

    Respecting women means you never have to say you're sorry for sexually harassing or sexually abusing one, because you never wanted to. :angelic:
     
  17. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Well, first pick your definition of "false alegation" and go from there. The accepted figure is low, 2% or so, but lets remember that this case was never formally reported and even today, is not a formal complaint.
    Only some 20% of sex assault cases are ever formally reported.
    The question here, to keep it simple, is if the alleged conduct constitutes a valid basis to now stop a supreme court appointment.

    Under some circumatances yes; if this was a pattern of behavior for example.
    Under the circumstances we know, shooter thinks no.
    Now, additional investigation and delay won't change this. It will bring more division, more pain and more humiliation for all parties involved without adding any more information.
    Judge kavanaugh's background and character have been investigated multiple times over his career. Any new allegation would almast certainly be politically motivated and in the end, worthless.
    VOTE
     
    1. freethinker
      What's the rush? If he's as squeaky clean as you claim he is, what's the harm? If not, well, I can understand the rush to get him confirmed before the secrets come out. Harder to remove an unqualified judge than to prevent one from being appointed to begin with.
       
      freethinker, Sep 21, 2018
      submissively speaking likes this.